Vitamin D

Evidence Level
Very Strong
5 Clinical Trials
8 Documented Benefits
5/5 Evidence Score

Vitamin D is a fat-soluble vitamin and steroid hormone precursor essential for calcium absorption, bone mineralization, and immune function. Most circulating vitamin D comes from cutaneous synthesis after UVB exposure, with food contribution typically modest. Vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) raises serum levels more effectively than D2 (ergocalciferol). The strongest evidence is for preventing and correcting deficiency, which causes rickets in children and osteomalacia in adults. That is a different question from taking vitamin D when your level is already adequate: in large placebo-controlled trials of adults not selected for deficiency (VITAL, D-Health, the Finnish Vitamin D Trial), vitamin D did not prevent fractures, falls, cardiovascular events, cancer or depression, and pooled trials show no clear protection against respiratory infections.

Studied Dose RDA 600 IU/day (15 mcg) ages 1 to 70 and 800 IU/day (20 mcg) over 70; adult upper limit 4,000 IU/day. Trials used 2,000, 1,600 or 3,200 IU/day and 60,000 IU monthly.
Active Compound Vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) — preferred form, from lanolin or lichen (vegan); D2 (ergocalciferol) from UV-exposed yeast/mushrooms.
Deficiency information View details

Using National Academies thresholds, NHANES 2011-2014 found about 18% of people in the US aged 1 and older at risk of inadequacy (25(OH)D 12 to 19.6 ng/mL) and 5% at risk of deficiency (below 12 ng/mL), with higher rates in older adults, people with darker skin, and northern latitudes. Severe deficiency causes rickets in children (irreversible bone deformities if untreated) and osteomalacia in adults. Most cases are subclinical and detected by blood test.

Common symptoms

  • Bone pain or muscle aches
  • Muscle weakness, especially in the legs
  • Fatigue
  • Frequent illness or infections
  • Mood changes — depressive symptoms (in deficient populations)
  • Slow wound healing
  • Hair loss
  • Bone deformities in children (rickets) — bowed legs, delayed growth
  • Often asymptomatic until severe

At-risk groups

  • Adults aged 65+ (skin produces less vitamin D from sunlight)
  • People with darker skin (melanin reduces vitamin D synthesis)
  • People living above about 37° latitude (little UVB in winter)
  • Indoor lifestyle, office workers, night shift workers
  • People with obesity (vitamin D sequestered in fat tissue)
  • Exclusively breastfed infants without supplementation
  • People with malabsorption conditions (celiac, Crohn's, gastric bypass)
  • People taking corticosteroids, anticonvulsants, or weight-loss drugs
  • People who consistently use sunscreen or cover skin for cultural reasons
When to see a doctor: Persistent bone pain or muscle weakness, or a condition that affects vitamin D absorption or metabolism, warrants asking a doctor about a 25-hydroxyvitamin D blood test; the Endocrine Society (2024) advises against routine testing of healthy people. The National Academies consider 20 ng/mL (50 nmol/L) or more sufficient for most people, with deficiency risk rising below 12 ng/mL (30 nmol/L). Important: do not take high-dose vitamin D (>4,000 IU/day) without lab confirmation — toxicity causes hypercalcemia.

Benefits

Bone health: essential when deficient, no fracture benefit when replete

Severe vitamin D deficiency causes rickets in children and osteomalacia in adults — at this level, supplementation matters absolutely. Older trials that found fewer hip fractures with calcium plus vitamin D were done in very old people who often had low vitamin D levels and low calcium intake, such as a French trial in 3,270 women with an average age of 84. In people over 50 living in the community, a meta-analysis of 33 trials (51,145 adults) found that calcium, vitamin D or both did not reduce hip or total fractures, and the VITAL fracture study (25,871 adults, 2,000 IU/day for a median 5.3 years) found no effect on total, nonvertebral or hip fractures, with no difference by baseline vitamin D level. If your level is adequate, extra vitamin D does not protect your bones; in one 3-year trial, 4,000 and 10,000 IU/day produced lower forearm bone density than 400 IU/day.

Cardiovascular events — supplementation does not prevent CVD

Despite strong observational links between low vitamin D and heart disease, the definitive randomized trials are negative. The largest trial (~26,000 adults, 2,000 IU/day for over 5 years) showed no reduction in heart attacks, strokes, or cardiovascular mortality. A second large trial replicated the null result. Vitamin D supplementation does not prevent cardiovascular disease in unselected adults — the observational link most likely reflects confounding, since people with low vitamin D tend to be less healthy in other ways.

Cancer: no prevention, and mixed signals on cancer death

Vitamin D supplementation does not prevent cancer: VITAL found no reduction in invasive cancer (HR 0.96). For cancer death, VITAL's estimate was 17% lower but not statistically significant (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.02), and a 2022 meta-analysis found about 13% fewer cancer deaths only in trials of daily dosing (SRR 0.87), not in trials of large intermittent doses. The D-Health trial (21,315 older Australians, 60,000 IU monthly) pointed the other way: cancer deaths were not significantly different overall (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.39), but exploratory analyses excluding the first 2 years suggested more cancer deaths (HR 1.24), and the investigators advised that this regimen might not be appropriate for people who are already vitamin D replete. Do not take vitamin D to prevent or treat cancer.

Autoimmune diagnoses in VITAL: an early signal that faded

In an ancillary analysis of VITAL, people taking 2,000 IU/day of vitamin D3 (with or without omega-3) for a median 5.3 years had 22% fewer confirmed autoimmune diagnoses, including rheumatoid arthritis, polymyalgia rheumatica, autoimmune thyroid disease and psoriasis (123 vs 155 cases; HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.99, P=0.05). The finding has not held up: when later-confirmed cases that began during the trial were added, the estimate was no longer statistically significant (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.04), and over 7 years of follow-up, including 2 years after the capsules stopped, there was no difference (HR 0.98). It is a single, unreplicated result about disease incidence and is not a reason for healthy adults to supplement.

Falls in older adults: not reduced in large trials

A 2009 meta-analysis found 19% fewer falls in 7 trials (1,921 older adults) that used 700 to 1,000 IU/day. Larger, later trials did not confirm this: VITAL (2,000 IU/day, 25,871 adults) found no reduction in falls, with no difference by baseline vitamin D level, and D-Health (60,000 IU monthly, 21,315 adults) found no reduction overall, with more falls in the subgroup of people of normal body weight. A 2018 meta-analysis of 37 trials (34,144 people) found no effect on falls (RR 0.97). A single yearly dose of 500,000 IU increased falls by 15% in older women. In 2018 the US Preventive Services Task Force recommended against vitamin D to prevent falls in community-dwelling adults 65 and older not known to have osteoporosis or vitamin D deficiency.

Respiratory infections: no clear protection in updated evidence

A 2017 pooled analysis of 25 trials found 12% lower odds of acute respiratory infection (OR 0.88), with the largest effect in people with very low starting levels. The 2025 update, covering 40 trials and 61,589 participants, found a similar point estimate but no statistically significant protection (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.00), and the effect did not differ by baseline vitamin D status, dose or dosing frequency. The CORONAVIT trial (6,200 UK adults, test-and-treat with 800 or 3,200 IU/day) did not reduce respiratory infections or COVID-19. Do not rely on vitamin D to prevent colds or flu.

COVID-19: vitamin D3 trials were null

Low vitamin D was associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes in observational data, but randomized trials of vitamin D3 were null: a single 200,000 IU dose did not shorten hospital stay in 240 patients with moderate to severe COVID-19, and the CORONAVIT test-and-treat trial in 6,200 UK adults did not reduce COVID-19 infections. Small studies of calcifediol (25-hydroxyvitamin D), a different chemical form sold as a prescription medicine in some countries, do not apply to ordinary vitamin D3 supplements. Vitamin D does not treat or prevent COVID-19 and does not replace vaccination or medical care.

Depression and mood: no benefit in a large prevention trial

Vitamin D deficiency consistently tracks with depression in observational studies. In VITAL-DEP (18,353 adults aged 50 and older, 2,000 IU/day for 5.3 years), vitamin D did not reduce new or recurrent depression or change mood scores. Whether correcting a true deficiency improves mood has not been settled by large trials. Vitamin D is not an antidepressant, and persistent low mood needs medical care.

Mechanism of action

1

Metabolic Activation

Vitamin D (either D2 or D3) is first hydroxylated in the liver to form 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], the main circulating form. A second hydroxylation occurs primarily in the kidney, producing the active form, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25(OH)₂D, also called calcitriol]. These steps are catalyzed by cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYPs), such as CYP2R1 in the liver and CYP27B1 in the kidney

2

Genomic Actions

Calcitriol binds to the vitamin D receptor (VDR), a nuclear transcription factor present in many cell types. The VDR-calcitriol complex forms a heterodimer with the retinoid X receptor (RXR). This complex binds to vitamin D response elements (VDREs) in the DNA, regulating the transcription of hundreds of genes. These genes are involved in calcium and phosphate homeostasis, cell proliferation, differentiation, and immune function

3

Non-Genomic Actions

Some effects of vitamin D are too rapid to be explained by gene transcription, such as rapid calcium uptake in cells. These may be mediated by membrane-associated receptors and signaling pathways, including PDIA3

Clinical trials

1
VITAL — Primary CV and Cancer Prevention Trial
PubMed

Largest vitamin D primary prevention clinical trial to date — randomized double-blind placebo-controlled 2x2 factorial trial of vitamin D3 alongside omega-3 fatty acids. Published in NEJM. Participants were not selected for vitamin D deficiency; mean baseline 25(OH)D was about 77 nmol/L (31 ng/mL).

25,871 US adults (men ≥50, women ≥55). 5.3-year intervention with vitamin D3 2,000 IU/day or placebo.

Primary endpoints (invasive cancer, major cardiovascular events) were negative — no significant difference vs placebo. In adults not selected for vitamin D deficiency, vitamin D did not reduce invasive cancer (HR 0.96) or major cardiovascular events (HR 0.97); death from cancer, a secondary endpoint, was not significantly lower (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.02). Established the strongest single counterpoint to widespread observational data linking low vitamin D to CV and cancer risk.

2
VITAL Autoimmune Ancillary Study (single trial, effect faded on follow-up)
PubMed

Ancillary study of the VITAL trial (median 5.3 years) with confirmed incident autoimmune disease as its endpoint; not one of VITAL's main cancer and cardiovascular endpoints. Published in BMJ (376:e066452). Autoimmune disease cases verified through medical record review and rheumatology consensus.

25,871 VITAL participants followed for new-onset autoimmune disease over 5 years.

Vitamin D 2,000 IU/day (with or without omega-3) was followed by fewer confirmed autoimmune diagnoses: 123 vs 155 (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.99, P=0.05). Vitamin D alone and vitamin D plus omega-3 gave similar estimates versus double placebo (HR 0.68 and 0.69). Diseases included rheumatoid arthritis, polymyalgia rheumatica, autoimmune thyroid disease and psoriasis. In a 2024 follow-up that added later-confirmed cases, the in-trial effect was no longer significant (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.04), and over 7 years of follow-up, including 2 years after supplements stopped, there was no difference (HR 0.98).

3
Finnish Vitamin D Trial (FIND): Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial
PubMed

5-year randomized placebo-controlled trial in elderly Finnish adults comparing two vitamin D3 dose levels vs placebo. Published in American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. Northern latitude population with naturally lower sun exposure.

2,495 elderly Finnish adults (men ≥60, post-menopausal women ≥65). Three arms: placebo, 1,600 IU/day, or 3,200 IU/day for 5 years.

NO significant differences across the three arms for cardiovascular events, invasive cancer, or all-cause mortality. Reinforces the VITAL findings at higher doses. Mean baseline 25(OH)D in the measured subcohort was 75 nmol/L, so most participants were already replete, which the authors suggested may explain the null result.

4
Meta-Analysis, Not a Single Trial: Vitamin D and Respiratory Infections (2017, superseded by 2025 update)
PubMed

Individual participant data pooled analysis pooling raw data from randomized trials of vitamin D supplementation for prevention of acute respiratory infections. Published in BMJ. The 2025 update of this analysis (40 trials, 61,589 participants) no longer found statistically significant protection.

10,933 participants across 25 clinical trials. Various supplementation regimens (daily, weekly, bolus).

Across all participants, vitamin D lowered the odds of acute respiratory infection by 12% (adjusted OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.96). Daily or weekly dosing gave OR 0.81, bolus dosing gave no protection (OR 0.97), and people starting below 25 nmol/L on daily or weekly dosing had the largest effect (OR 0.30). The 2025 update found no statistically significant overall protection (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.00) and no difference by baseline vitamin D status.

5
Meta-Analysis, Not a Single Trial: Calcium or Vitamin D and Fractures in Community-Dwelling Older Adults
PubMed

Evidence review and pooled analysis of fracture prevention trials in community-dwelling older adults. Published in JAMA. Distinguished community-dwelling from institutionalized populations, which has been an important confounding variable in earlier analyses.

51,145 community-dwelling older adults across 33 clinical trials.

Calcium, vitamin D, or the combination was not associated with reduced fracture incidence in community-dwelling older adults — contradicting long-held assumptions about routine supplementation for fracture prevention. Vitamin D alone showed no reduction in hip fracture (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.47), and results were generally consistent regardless of dose, sex, fracture history, dietary calcium and baseline 25(OH)D. The review included only community-dwelling adults, so it does not address nursing-home residents.

Side effects and drug interactions

Common Potential side effects

Vitamin D toxicity is rare below the adult upper limit of 4,000 IU/day (the RDA is 600 to 800 IU/day). At very high chronic doses, hypercalcemia is the primary concern.
Hypercalcemia symptoms: nausea, vomiting, weakness, polyuria, polydipsia, kidney stones.
Severe toxicity (rare): altered mental status, kidney injury, cardiac arrhythmia.
Very large intermittent doses can backfire: a single yearly oral dose of 500,000 IU increased falls by 15% and fractures by 26% in 2,256 women aged 70 and older (Sanders 2010). In a 3-year trial, 4,000 and 10,000 IU/day lowered forearm bone density compared with 400 IU/day (Burt 2019). In the D-Health trial, 60,000 IU monthly in unscreened older adults did not lower mortality and exploratory analyses pointed toward more cancer deaths; the investigators cautioned against that regimen in people already vitamin D replete. VITAL (2,000 IU/day) found no increase in fractures.
Caution: patients with sarcoidosis, primary hyperparathyroidism, lymphoma, or some kidney diseases — these conditions can dysregulate vitamin D metabolism and cause hypercalcemia at standard doses.

Important Drug interactions

Thiazide diuretics — reduce renal calcium excretion; combined with vitamin D may cause hypercalcemia. Monitor serum calcium.
Orlistat and cholestyramine — reduce absorption of fat-soluble vitamins. Separate dosing or supplement higher amounts.
Anticonvulsants (phenytoin, phenobarbital, carbamazepine) — induce CYP enzymes accelerating vitamin D catabolism. Higher doses often required.
Corticosteroids (long-term) — impair vitamin D metabolism and calcium absorption. Monitor vitamin D status in chronic users.
Digoxin — hypercalcemia from vitamin D excess can increase digoxin toxicity risk. Maintain serum calcium in normal range.
Statins: in a small study of 16 patients, 800 IU/day of vitamin D for 6 weeks lowered blood levels of atorvastatin and its active metabolites (LDL cholesterol also fell). NIH ODS notes high vitamin D intakes might reduce the potency of atorvastatin, lovastatin and simvastatin.

Frequently asked questions about Vitamin D

How much vitamin D should I take?

The RDA is 600 IU (15 mcg) a day for adults up to 70 and 800 IU (20 mcg) over 70, which covers most people. Higher doses have not prevented fractures, falls, heart disease or cancer in large trials of adults not selected for deficiency, and the Endocrine Society (2024) suggests against routinely taking more than the RDA to prevent disease in healthy adults under 75 (it does suggest supplementation for children, adults over 75, pregnancy and high-risk prediabetes). People with a confirmed deficiency or malabsorption may need more, set with a doctor. The National Academies consider a blood level of 20 ng/mL (50 nmol/L) sufficient for most people.

Should I take vitamin D with food?

Yes. Vitamin D is fat-soluble, so it absorbs best taken with a meal that contains some fat. Time of day does not matter much. Consistency matters more than timing, so take it whenever you will remember it daily.

Do I need to take vitamin K2 with vitamin D?

It is not a requirement. Vitamin K is needed for proteins involved in handling calcium in bone and blood vessels, but large randomized trials showing that adding K2 to ordinary vitamin D doses prevents fractures or arterial calcification are lacking. The simpler safeguard is not taking high doses of vitamin D without medical supervision. If you take warfarin, do not start vitamin K without talking to your doctor.

Can you take too much vitamin D?

Yes, though it is uncommon at typical doses. Toxicity is rare; reported cases usually involve intakes far above the 4,000 IU daily upper limit, often more than 10,000 IU a day for long periods, and it shows up as high blood calcium and nausea. Staying at or below 4,000 IU daily without testing is generally considered safe for adults; go higher only under medical guidance with blood monitoring.

What is Vitamin D?

Vitamin D is a fat-soluble vitamin and steroid hormone precursor essential for calcium absorption, bone mineralization, and immune function. Most circulating vitamin D comes from cutaneous synthesis after UVB exposure, with food contribution typically modest.

What is Vitamin D used for?

Vitamin D is researched primarily for Bone Health. Severe vitamin D deficiency causes rickets in children and osteomalacia in adults — at this level, supplementation matters absolutely.

What are the signs of Vitamin D deficiency?

Using National Academies thresholds, Nhanes 2011-2014 found about 18% of people in the US aged 1 and older at risk of inadequacy (25(OH)D 12 to 19.6 ng/mL) and 5% at risk of deficiency (below 12 ng/mL), with higher rates in older adults, people with darker skin, and northern latitudes.

What is the recommended dosage of Vitamin D?

The clinically studied dose is RDA 600 IU/day (15 mcg) ages 1 to 70 and 800 IU/day (20 mcg) over 70; adult upper limit 4,000 IU/day. Trials used 2,000, 1,600 or 3,200 IU/day and 60,000 IU monthly. Always follow the product label and check with a healthcare provider for personal advice.

Is Vitamin D safe, and does it have side effects?

For most healthy adults, Vitamin D is well tolerated at studied doses. Reported effects can include: Vitamin D toxicity is rare below the adult upper limit of 4,000 IU/day (the RDA is 600 to 800 IU/day). At very high chronic doses, hypercalcemia is the primary concern. Hypercalcemia symptoms: nausea, vomiting, weakness, polyuria, polydipsia, kidney stones. It may also interact with some medications. Vitamin D is not right for everyone, so check with a healthcare provider first if you are pregnant or breastfeeding, have a medical condition, or take prescription medication.

Does Vitamin D interact with any medications?

Possible interactions include: Thiazide diuretics — reduce renal calcium excretion; combined with vitamin D may cause hypercalcemia. Monitor serum calcium. Orlistat and cholestyramine — reduce absorption of fat-soluble vitamins. Separate dosing or supplement higher amounts. If you take prescription medication, check with a pharmacist or doctor before using it.

How strong is the scientific evidence for Vitamin D?

NutraSmarts rates the evidence for Vitamin D as Very Strong (5 out of 5). It is backed by 5 clinical trials and 23 cited references summarized on this page. A higher rating reflects more, larger, and better-designed human studies.

References(23 citations)

Evidence ratings on NutraSmarts are based on the totality of human clinical research, with emphasis on randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews. The references below directly support claims made throughout this page.

  1. Manson JE, Cook NR, Lee IM, et al. Vitamin D Supplements and Prevention of Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(1):33-44. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1809944.PubMedUsed to support: VITAL primary trial — 25,871 adults; vitamin D3 2,000 IU/day did not reduce invasive cancer or major cardiovascular events vs placebo over 5.3 years
  2. Hahn J, Cook NR, Alexander EK, et al. Vitamin D and marine omega 3 fatty acid supplementation and incident autoimmune disease: VITAL randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 2022;376:e066452. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-066452.PubMedUsed to support: VITAL ancillary study: 2,000 IU/day vitamin D3 for a median 5.3 years was followed by 22% fewer confirmed autoimmune diagnoses (123 vs 155; HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.99, P=0.05); vitamin D alone and with omega-3 gave similar estimates
  3. Virtanen JK, Nurmi T, Aro A, et al. Vitamin D supplementation and prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer in the Finnish Vitamin D Trial: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2022;115(5):1300-1310. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab419.PubMedUsed to support: Finnish Vitamin D Trial: 2,495 older Finnish adults given 1,600 or 3,200 IU/day vitamin D3 or placebo for 5 years; no reduction in major cardiovascular events or invasive cancer and no difference in total mortality; mean baseline 25(OH)D in a 551-person subcohort was 75 nmol/L, and the authors suggested sufficient vitamin D status may explain the null result
  4. Martineau AR, Jolliffe DA, Hooper RL, et al. Vitamin D supplementation to prevent acute respiratory tract infections: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data. BMJ. 2017;356:i6583. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6583.PubMedUsed to support: IPD meta-analysis of 25 RCTs (10,933 participants): vitamin D lowered the odds of acute respiratory infection overall (adjusted OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.96); daily or weekly dosing OR 0.81, bolus dosing no effect (OR 0.97), largest effect with baseline 25(OH)D below 25 nmol/L (OR 0.30)
  5. Zhao JG, Zeng XT, Wang J, Liu L. Association Between Calcium or Vitamin D Supplementation and Fracture Incidence in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA. 2017;318(24):2466-2482. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.19344.PubMedUsed to support: Fracture prevention — meta-analysis of 33 trials, 51,145 community-dwelling older adults; calcium, vitamin D, or combination not associated with reduced fracture incidence
  6. Holick MF, Binkley NC, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, et al. Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(7):1911-30. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-0385.PubMedUsed to support: 2011 Endocrine Society guideline on evaluating and treating vitamin D deficiency in at-risk patients, defining deficiency as 25(OH)D below 20 ng/mL, insufficiency as 21 to 29 ng/mL and sufficiency as 30 ng/mL or more; the Society's 2024 guideline did not define an optimal target level and suggests against routine testing in people without established indications
  7. Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Dawson-Hughes B, Staehelin HB, et al. Fall prevention with supplemental and active forms of vitamin D: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2009;339:b3692. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3692.PubMedUsed to support: Meta-analysis of 8 double-blind RCTs (2,426 older adults): in the 7 trials using 700 to 1,000 IU/day (1,921 participants), vitamin D reduced fall risk by 19% (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.92); 200 to 600 IU/day did not reduce falls (RR 1.10)
  8. LeBoff MS, Chou SH, Ratliff KA, et al. Supplemental Vitamin D and Incident Fractures in Midlife and Older Adults. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(4):299-309. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2202106.PubMedUsed to support: VITAL fracture ancillary study: in 25,871 adults not selected for deficiency or low bone mass, 2,000 IU/day vitamin D3 for 5.3 years did not reduce total (HR 0.98), nonvertebral (HR 0.97) or hip fractures (HR 1.01), with no modification by baseline 25(OH)D
  9. Jolliffe DA, Camargo CA Jr, Sluyter JD, et al. Vitamin D supplementation to prevent acute respiratory infections: systematic review and meta-analysis of stratified aggregate data. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2025;13(4):307-320. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(24)00348-6.PubMedUsed to support: Updated meta-analysis of 40 RCTs (61,589 participants): vitamin D did not statistically significantly reduce acute respiratory infection risk (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.00), with no effect modification by age, baseline vitamin D status, dosing frequency or dose
  10. Jolliffe DA, Holt H, Greenig M, et al. Effect of a test-and-treat approach to vitamin D supplementation on risk of all cause acute respiratory tract infection and covid-19: phase 3 randomised controlled trial (CORONAVIT). BMJ. 2022;378:e071230. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-071230.PubMedUsed to support: Open-label RCT in 6,200 UK adults: offering a vitamin D test and 800 or 3,200 IU/day to those below 75 nmol/L did not reduce all-cause acute respiratory infection or COVID-19 over 6 months
  11. Neale RE, Baxter C, Romero BD, et al. The D-Health Trial: a randomised controlled trial of the effect of vitamin D on mortality. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2022;10(2):120-128. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00345-4.PubMedUsed to support: 21,315 unscreened Australians aged 60 and older given 60,000 IU vitamin D3 monthly for 5 years: no reduction in all-cause mortality (HR 1.04); cancer mortality HR 1.15 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.39), and exploratory analyses excluding the first 2 years were consistent with increased cancer death (HR 1.24)
  12. Costenbader KH, Cook NR, Lee IM, et al. Vitamin D and Marine n-3 Fatty Acids for Autoimmune Disease Prevention: Outcomes Two Years After Completion of a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024;76(6):973-983. doi: 10.1002/art.42811.PubMedUsed to support: VITAL 2-year post-trial follow-up (21,592 participants): the protective effect of 2,000 IU/day vitamin D on autoimmune disease dissipated (HR 0.98 at 7 years), and adding newly confirmed in-trial cases made the randomized-period estimate non-significant (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.04)
  13. Sanders KM, Stuart AL, Williamson EJ, et al. Annual high-dose oral vitamin D and falls and fractures in older women: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010;303(18):1815-22. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.594.PubMedUsed to support: 2,256 community-dwelling women aged 70 and older: a single annual oral dose of 500,000 IU cholecalciferol increased falls (RR 1.15) and fractures (RR 1.26) compared with placebo
  14. Burt LA, Billington EO, Rose MS, et al. Effect of High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation on Volumetric Bone Density and Bone Strength: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019;322(8):736-745. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.11889.PubMedUsed to support: 311 healthy adults aged 55 to 70: 3 years of 4,000 or 10,000 IU/day vitamin D3 produced lower radial bone density than 400 IU/day, with no difference in bone strength; the authors found no support for a bone benefit of high doses
  15. LeBoff MS, Murata EM, Cook NR, et al. VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL (VITAL): Effects of Vitamin D Supplements on Risk of Falls in the US Population. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105(9):2929-2938. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa311.PubMedUsed to support: 25,871 adults (mean baseline 25(OH)D 77 nmol/L): 2,000 IU/day vitamin D3 for 5.3 years did not reduce two or more falls (OR 0.97) or injurious falls, with no difference in those starting below 50 nmol/L
  16. Waterhouse M, Sanguineti E, Baxter C, et al. Vitamin D supplementation and risk of falling: outcomes from the randomized, placebo-controlled D-Health Trial. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2021;12(6):1428-1439. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12759.PubMedUsed to support: D-Health: 60,000 IU vitamin D3 monthly did not reduce falls (OR 1.02); falls increased in participants with BMI below 25 (OR 1.25)
  17. Bolland MJ, Grey A, Avenell A. Effects of vitamin D supplementation on musculoskeletal health: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(11):847-858. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30265-1.PubMedUsed to support: Meta-analysis of 81 RCTs (53,537 adults): vitamin D had no effect on total fracture (RR 1.00), hip fracture (RR 1.11) or falls (RR 0.97), with similar results at doses above 800 IU/day, and no clinically relevant effect on bone density
  18. US Preventive Services Task Force; Grossman DC, Curry SJ, Owens DK, et al. Interventions to Prevent Falls in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2018;319(16):1696-1704. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.3097.PubMedUsed to support: USPSTF found adequate evidence that vitamin D has no benefit in preventing falls and recommended against vitamin D supplementation to prevent falls in community-dwelling adults 65 and older not known to have osteoporosis or vitamin D deficiency (D recommendation)
  19. Okereke OI, Reynolds CF 3rd, Mischoulon D, et al. Effect of Long-term Vitamin D3 Supplementation vs Placebo on Risk of Depression or Clinically Relevant Depressive Symptoms and on Change in Mood Scores: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020;324(5):471-480. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.10224.PubMedUsed to support: VITAL-DEP, 18,353 adults aged 50 and older: 2,000 IU/day vitamin D3 for 5.3 years did not reduce incident or recurrent depression (HR 0.97) or change mood scores
  20. Murai IH, Fernandes AL, Sales LP, et al. Effect of a Single High Dose of Vitamin D3 on Hospital Length of Stay in Patients With Moderate to Severe COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021;325(11):1053-1060. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.26848.PubMedUsed to support: 240 hospitalized patients with moderate to severe COVID-19: a single 200,000 IU dose of vitamin D3 did not shorten hospital stay or reduce mortality, ICU admission or mechanical ventilation
  21. Keum N, Chen QY, Lee DH, et al. Vitamin D supplementation and total cancer incidence and mortality by daily vs. infrequent large-bolus dosing strategies: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br J Cancer. 2022;127(5):872-878. doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-01850-2.PubMedUsed to support: Meta-analysis of RCTs: no effect on total cancer incidence (SRR 0.99); total cancer mortality not significantly reduced overall (SRR 0.92), but lower in trials of daily dosing (SRR 0.87) and not in trials of infrequent large-bolus dosing
  22. Demay MB, Pittas AG, Bikle DD, et al. Vitamin D for the Prevention of Disease: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2024;109(8):1907-1947. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgae290.PubMedUsed to support: 2024 Endocrine Society guideline: suggests empiric vitamin D for ages 1 to 18, adults over 75, pregnancy and high-risk prediabetes; suggests against empiric supplementation above the DRI in healthy adults under 75 and against routine 25(OH)D testing, noting no clear optimal target level
  23. Schwartz JB. Effects of vitamin D supplementation in atorvastatin-treated patients: a new drug interaction with an unexpected consequence. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009;85(2):198-203. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2008.165.PubMedUsed to support: 16 patients on atorvastatin: 800 IU/day vitamin D for 6 weeks lowered atorvastatin and active metabolite concentrations while LDL and total cholesterol also fell