Pine Bark Extract

Pinus species
Evidence Level
Moderate
4 Clinical Trials
8 Documented Benefits
3/5 Evidence Score

Pine bark extract is concentrated from the bark of pine trees. The best-studied form is Pycnogenol, a trademarked extract of French maritime pine (Pinus pinaster); other products use other species, such as Chinese red pine (Pinus massoniana) or New Zealand's Pinus radiata (Enzogenol). The main compounds are procyanidins, polyphenols related to those in grape seed extract. Pine bark extracts have been tested in many small trials for blood vessel function, blood pressure, blood sugar, joints, skin and attention in children. A 2020 Cochrane review of 27 trials rated all of the evidence very low certainty, and most trials used Pycnogenol and were funded by supplement makers. Generic extracts are often standardized differently (for example '95% proanthocyanidins' rather than the US Pharmacopeia's 65 to 75% procyanidins), and two other branded pine extracts showed no blood pressure effect versus placebo, so Pycnogenol results cannot be assumed to apply to them.

Studied Dose Most trials used 100 to 200 mg a day of a branded extract (range about 30 to 360 mg), usually for 1 to 6 months; trials in children used 1 mg per kg, or 20 to 40 mg a day.
Active Compound Procyanidins (oligomeric proanthocyanidins) with catechin, taxifolin and phenolic acids; standardization varies by product and species (USP maritime pine extract: 65 to 75% procyanidins).

Benefits

Blood pressure studies: mixed, very low certainty

A meta-analysis of 7 double-blind Pycnogenol trials found no significant change in blood pressure. A 2025 analysis of 27 trials of pine bark extracts found drops of about 2 mmHg but rated that evidence very low certainty, found signs of publication bias, and saw no drop at 200 mg a day. A 130-person Stanford trial of a Japanese-made pine bark extract (Flavangenol) found no effect versus placebo. One small Swiss Pycnogenol trial found better blood vessel widening without lower blood pressure.

Heavy legs: small, mostly open studies

Small trials, mostly from one research group and mostly unblinded, reported less leg swelling and heaviness in people with chronic venous insufficiency. Two small trials from 2000 were positive but tiny, and European venous guidelines do not include pine bark extract.

Memory: limited evidence

One double-blind trial in 101 adults aged 60 to 85 found better working memory after 3 months of 150 mg a day of Pycnogenol, and a small trial of Enzogenol with vitamin C found faster spatial working memory. A planned 12-month Pycnogenol trial has not published its main results, and most other memory studies are open registry studies from one research group.

Attention scores in children

In small trials in children with ADHD, Pycnogenol was reported to improve some attention and behavior ratings. In the largest trial (88 children), teachers saw improvement but parents did not, and it could not show Pycnogenol was as good as methylphenidate. A small adult trial found no effect. It is not a replacement for medical care.

Breathing studies (small trials)

Two small trials, one in 60 children funded by Horphag, reported better breathing measures and less rescue-inhaler use with Pycnogenol alongside usual care. A Cochrane review rated this evidence very low certainty. It is not a replacement for prescribed treatment.

Skin hydration and elasticity

A double-blind crossover trial in 76 outdoor workers found that 100 mg a day of Pycnogenol for 12 weeks prevented the usual autumn drop in skin hydration. Claims of protection from sunburn rest on one uncontrolled study in 21 people.

Antioxidant in lab tests

Procyanidins are antioxidants in laboratory tests. In people, a few trials found lower oxidative stress markers, such as 15-F2t-isoprostane in a small Swiss heart trial. The FTC called a seller's claim that pycnogenol was 20 times more protective than vitamin C unsubstantiated in 2000.

CRP marker: results vary by trial

A meta-analysis of 5 trials (324 adults) of Pycnogenol, a branded French maritime pine bark extract, found lower CRP overall, but heterogeneity was very high (I² 99%), two trials were not randomized, and the two double-blind trials at 200 mg/day showed no clear change, so the true effect is uncertain. In a subgroup analysis by the Belcaro group of a 3-month knee osteoarthritis trial (100 mg/day), among people with high CRP, it fell from 3.9 to 1.1 mg/L vs 3.9 to 3.6 on placebo.

Mechanism of action

1

Blood vessel lining effects

In small trials, Pycnogenol improved flow-mediated dilation and lowered endothelin-1, a vessel-narrowing signal. These effects on the vessel lining are the proposed basis for its circulation claims.

2

Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity

Procyanidins are antioxidants in laboratory tests. In people, results on inflammation markers are mixed.

3

Absorption and metabolites

The large procyanidin chains are poorly absorbed. After a dose, small phenolic compounds and a gut-bacteria metabolite (M1) appear in the blood at low levels that vary widely between people.

4

Capillary effects (lab and animal data)

Laboratory and animal studies suggest procyanidins may reduce capillary leakiness. Human venous studies were mostly small and open.

Clinical trials

1
Pycnogenol and blood vessel function in heart disease
PubMed

Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover: 200 mg a day for 8 weeks on top of standard therapy. Supported by an unrestricted Horphag grant. (Enseleit et al. 2012, Eur Heart J)

23 adults with stable coronary artery disease.

Flow-mediated dilation improved (treatment effect 2.75 percentage points) and an oxidative stress marker fell slightly, but blood pressure, inflammation markers and platelet adhesion did not change.

2
A Japanese-made pine bark extract and heart risk factors
PubMed

Randomized, placebo-controlled trial: 200 mg a day of Flavangenol (Toyo-FVG), not Pycnogenol, for 12 weeks; funded by the extract's maker per ClinicalTrials.gov. (Drieling et al. 2010, Arch Intern Med)

130 adults at increased cardiovascular risk.

No difference from placebo in blood pressure, cholesterol, glucose, insulin or CRP.

3
Pycnogenol in children with ADHD
PubMed

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial: 1 mg per kg a day for 4 weeks; Horphag-funded. (Trebatická et al. 2006, Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry)

61 children with ADHD.

Hyperactivity fell and attention ratings improved on Pycnogenol, with symptoms returning a month after stopping. A Cochrane review rated this evidence very low certainty.

4
Pycnogenol and leg swelling
PubMed

Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial: 100 mg three times a day for 2 months. (Arcangeli 2000, Fitoterapia)

40 adults with chronic venous insufficiency.

Swelling, heaviness and pain fell on Pycnogenol, with no effect on placebo. A small, early trial; most later venous studies were open studies from one research group.

Side effects and drug interactions

Common Potential side effects

Generally well tolerated in short-term trials.
Mild stomach upset, dizziness, headache or nausea possible.
Short-term trials (up to about 6 months) reported mostly mild side effects; long-term safety has not been well studied.
Pregnancy data are minimal; pregnant and breastfeeding women should talk with their clinician first.

Important Drug interactions

Blood thinners and antiplatelet drugs: Pycnogenol reduced platelet clumping in small studies; no study has checked bleeding risk with these medicines, so ask your doctor before combining.
Blood pressure medicines: in two trials some people needed less of their blood pressure medicine.
Diabetes medicines: small trials found slightly lower fasting glucose, so effects could add up; monitor your levels.
Immune-suppressing medicines: a supplement database advises caution based on lab data suggesting immune stimulation.
Talk with your doctor before combining with heart, blood pressure or diabetes medicines.

Frequently asked questions about Pine Bark Extract

What is pine bark extract used for?

Pine bark extract is sold for circulation, skin and antioxidant support. Most of the research used one branded French maritime pine extract, Pycnogenol, and a 2020 Cochrane review rated all of it very low certainty.

What is pine bark extract good for?

Pine bark extracts have been studied for blood vessel function, leg swelling, skin hydration, knee comfort and memory, mostly in small trials of one branded extract. Results from that extract cannot be assumed to apply to generic pine bark.

How much pine bark extract should I take?

Most trials used 100 to 200 mg a day of a branded extract for 1 to 6 months. Results from branded extracts may not apply to generic ones, so follow the product label.

Is pine bark extract safe?

Short-term trials reported mostly mild side effects such as stomach upset, dizziness and headache. It reduced platelet clumping in small studies and may add to the effects of blood pressure or diabetes medicines, so check with your doctor if you take blood thinners or those medicines.

What is Pine Bark Extract?

Pine bark extract is concentrated from the bark of pine trees. The best-studied form is Pycnogenol, a trademarked extract of French maritime pine (Pinus pinaster); other products use other species, such as Chinese red pine (Pinus massoniana) or New Zealand's Pinus radiata (Enzogenol).

Does Pine Bark Extract interact with any medications?

Possible interactions include: Blood thinners and antiplatelet drugs: Pycnogenol reduced platelet clumping in small studies; no study has checked bleeding risk with these medicines, so ask your doctor before combining. If you take prescription medication, check with a pharmacist or doctor before using it.

How strong is the scientific evidence for Pine Bark Extract?

NutraSmarts rates the evidence for Pine Bark Extract as Moderate (3 out of 5). It is backed by 4 study summaries and 6 cited references summarized on this page. A higher rating reflects more, larger, and better-designed human studies.

References(6 citations)

Evidence ratings on NutraSmarts are based on the totality of human clinical research, with emphasis on randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews. The references below directly support claims made throughout this page.

  1. Robertson NU, Schoonees A, Brand A, Visser J Pine bark (Pinus spp.) extract for treating chronic disorders Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2020;9(9):CD008294. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008294.pub5.PubMedUsed to support: Updated Cochrane review concluding there is insufficient evidence to support pine bark extract (incl. Pycnogenol) for any chronic disorder; trials were small, short, and heterogeneous. This is the central honest framing: positive signals exist but overall evidence is inadequate.
  2. Liu X, Wei J, Tan F, Zhou S, Wurthwein G, Rohdewald P Pycnogenol, French maritime pine bark extract, improves endothelial function of hypertensive patients Life Sciences. 2004;74(7):855-62. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2003.07.037.PubMedUsed to support: Double-blind trial in 58 adults with hypertension on nifedipine: 100 mg/day Pycnogenol for 12 weeks lowered the nifedipine dose needed and improved endothelial markers; the abstract does not give a blood pressure difference. Funded by Horphag according to the Cochrane review, with a Horphag-linked co-author.
  3. Cesarone MR, Belcaro G, Rohdewald P, Pellegrini L, Ledda A, Vinciguerra G, et al. Improvement of signs and symptoms of chronic venous insufficiency and microangiopathy with Pycnogenol: a prospective, controlled study Phytomedicine. 2010;17(11):835-9. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2010.04.009.PubMedUsed to support: Controlled study reporting reduced edema and improved chronic venous insufficiency symptoms with pine bark extract; supports the venous insufficiency/edema claim, but it is a small industry-affiliated trial consistent with the Cochrane caveat.
  4. Cesarone MR, Belcaro G, Rohdewald P, Pellegrini L, Ledda A, Vinciguerra G, et al. Comparison of Pycnogenol and Daflon in treating chronic venous insufficiency: a prospective, controlled study Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. 2006;12(2):205-212. doi: 10.1177/107602960601200209.PubMedUsed to support: Controlled comparison in which the authors reported Pycnogenol was superior to a standard venoactive drug for venous insufficiency symptoms and edema; Belcaro group, not blinded; adds support for the venous/edema use while again being small and industry-linked, reinforcing the limited-evidence framing.
  5. Nikpayam O, Rouhani MH, Pourmasoumi M, Roshanravan N, Ghaedi E, Mohammadi H. The Effect of Pycnogenol Supplementation on Plasma C-Reactive Protein Concentration: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin Nutr Res. 2018;7(2):117-125..PubMedUsed to support: Meta-analysis of 5 Pycnogenol trials (324 adults; two not randomized): pooled CRP change -1.22 mg/dL (95% CI -2.43 to -0.003), I²=99%. Heterogeneity disappeared in the >150 mg/day subgroup (two double-blind 200 mg/day trials), but that subgroup showed no significant change (-0.094, 95% CI -0.198 to 0.009). The authors call for larger, better-designed studies. Backs the Anti-Inflammatory benefit and its 'uncertain' hedge.
  6. Belcaro G, Cesarone MR, Errichi S, Zulli C, Errichi BM, Vinciguerra G, Ledda A, Di Renzo A, Stuard S, Dugall M, Pellegrini L, Gizzi G, Ippolito E, Ricci A, Cacchio M, Cipollone G, Ruffini I, Fano F, Hosoi M, Rohdewald P. Variations in C-reactive protein, plasma free radicals and fibrinogen values in patients with osteoarthritis treated with Pycnogenol. Redox Rep. 2008;13(6):271-6..PubMedUsed to support: Subset analysis of a 3-month placebo-controlled knee OA trial, limited to patients with CRP >3 mg/L (29 Pycnogenol, 26 placebo). CRP fell from 3.9 to 1.1 mg/L on Pycnogenol vs 3.9 to 3.6 mg/L on placebo (P<0.05), and fibrinogen fell to 62.8% of baseline. Backs the second half of the Anti-Inflammatory benefit.