Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG)

Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG
Evidence Level
Strong
10 Clinical Trials
6 Documented Benefits
4/5 Evidence Score

Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG; ATCC 53103) is a probiotic strain first patented in 1989. Its pili carry a mucus-binding protein that helps it cling to the gut lining. The firmest evidence is for children taking antibiotics: a meta-analysis of LGG trials found less antibiotic-related diarrhea in children, though not in adults overall, and a European pediatric expert group (ESPGHAN) strongly recommends LGG for at-risk children. In placebo-controlled trials in children, LGG in fermented milk lowered hospital-acquired digestive and respiratory infections, and upper respiratory infections in daycare. Other results differ: a large US trial in children with stomach bugs found no benefit, ESPGHAN gives LGG only a weak recommendation for that use, and one of two trials for preventing infant eczema found no effect. Probiotics have caused serious infections in very ill or immunocompromised patients.

Studied Dose Children on antibiotics: L. rhamnosus or S. boulardii at 5 to 40 billion CFU/day (Cochrane). Hospital trial: 1 billion CFU/day in fermented milk. Acute diarrhea trials: 10 billion CFU twice daily.
Active Compound Live Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG (ATCC 53103); brands include Culturelle®. Trial doses ranged from 1 billion CFU a day to 1 trillion CFU twice a day.

Benefits

Digestive support during antibiotic use in children

A meta-analysis of LGG trials (11 trials, 1,308 people) found antibiotic-related diarrhea in 12.3% versus 22.4% with placebo or no added treatment, significant in children (moderate-quality evidence) but not in adults overall. A Cochrane review pooled across strains found 8% versus 19% in children, and ESPGHAN strongly recommends LGG for at-risk children if a probiotic is used.

Digestive recovery in young children: hospital and emergency trials

In an Indian hospital trial in 559 children with acute watery diarrhea, LGG with rehydration shortened diarrhea and hospital stays compared with rehydration alone, without a placebo. A US placebo-controlled trial in 971 young children with gastroenteritis found no difference in severity, diarrhea length or vomiting, and ESPGHAN gives LGG only a weak recommendation for this use.

Digestive and respiratory health in hospitalized children

In a placebo-controlled trial in 742 hospitalized children, LGG at 1 billion CFU a day in fermented milk lowered the risk of hospital-acquired digestive infections (RR 0.40) and respiratory infections (RR 0.38); hospital stay length did not change. An ESPGHAN working group recommends LGG if a probiotic is used to prevent hospital diarrhea in children.

Upper respiratory health in children attending daycare

In a 3-month placebo-controlled trial in 281 daycare children, LGG in fermented milk lowered the risk of upper respiratory infections (RR 0.66). In a 7-month trial in 571 Helsinki daycare children, LGG milk led to 16% fewer sick days, with no significant difference after adjusting for age.

Infant skin health in allergy-prone families

In a Finnish trial, LGG given to mothers before birth and to infants for 6 months halved atopic eczema by age 2 (23% versus 46%), and the gap held at age 4. A German trial using the same strain found no difference (28% versus 27%) and more wheezing episodes with LGG, so the effect has not been reproduced.

Abdominal pain in children with functional gut complaints

A pooled analysis of 3 trials in 290 children with recurring abdominal pain found more responders with LGG than placebo (RR 1.31), with the clearest effect in children with IBS. There was no difference for functional abdominal pain or functional dyspepsia alone.

Mechanism of action

1

SpaCBA pili and mucus binding

LGG carries hair-like pili built from SpaC, SpaB and SpaA proteins. Lab work showed that the SpaC tip protein binds human intestinal mucus and that LGG lost its mucus binding when the spaC gene was switched off, which may help explain why LGG lingers in the gut longer than a related strain.

2

p40 and p75 proteins and gut lining cells

In cell and mouse colon tissue studies, two proteins secreted by LGG, p40 and p75, activated the survival signal Akt, protected gut lining cells from damage caused by inflammatory signals and supported cell growth. These are laboratory findings, not human results.

3

Survival through stomach acid and bile

A 30-year review notes that LGG was patented because it survives and grows at stomach acid pH and in bile and sticks to gut lining cells, traits that let it reach the intestine alive when taken by mouth.

Clinical trials

1
Hospital-Acquired Infections in 742 Hospitalized Children
PubMed

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial; LGG at 1 billion CFU a day in 100 mL fermented milk versus the same milk without LGG, for the hospital stay (Hojsak et al. 2010, Pediatrics)

742 hospitalized children randomized to LGG (n=376) or placebo (n=366).

LGG lowered the risk of hospital-acquired digestive infections (RR 0.40; NNT 15), respiratory infections (RR 0.38; NNT 30), vomiting episodes (RR 0.5) and diarrhea episodes (RR 0.24). Hospital stay length did not differ.

2
PECARN: LGG for Acute Gastroenteritis in Young Children
PubMed

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (NCT01773967) at 10 US pediatric emergency departments; LGG 10 billion CFU twice daily for 5 days; diarrhea duration (median 49.7 versus 50.9 hours) was a secondary outcome that did not differ (Schnadower et al. 2018, N Engl J Med)

971 children aged 3 months to 4 years with acute gastroenteritis; 943 completed

No difference on the primary outcome: moderate-to-severe gastroenteritis occurred in 11.8% on LGG and 12.6% on placebo (RR 0.96, P=0.83). Vomiting, daycare absence and household spread also did not differ. Funded by a US National Institutes of Health institute and others.

3
PERC: A Different L. rhamnosus Combination for Acute Gastroenteritis
PubMed

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (NCT01853124); R0011 with R0052 at 4 billion CFU twice daily for 5 days, registered as Lacidofil (Freedman et al. 2018, N Engl J Med)

886 children aged 3 to 48 months at six Canadian pediatric emergency departments

Moderate-to-severe gastroenteritis within 14 days: 26.1% on the active product vs 24.7% on placebo (P=0.72). Symptom duration, unscheduled visits and adverse events did not differ. It did not test the GG strain. Funded by CIHR and others; Institut Rosell Lallemand is a registered collaborator.

4
Perinatal LGG and Atopic Eczema at Age 2
PubMed

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial; LGG given to mothers before delivery and to their infants for 6 months after birth (Kalliomäki et al. 2001, Lancet)

Families with a close relative who had eczema, allergic rhinitis or asthma; 132 children assessed at age 2

Atopic eczema was diagnosed in 23% of the LGG group versus 46% on placebo (RR 0.51). At the 4-year follow-up it was 14 of 53 versus 25 of 54 children (RR 0.57). A later German trial of the same strain found no effect.

5
LGG Dose Trial in Indian Children with Acute Watery Diarrhea
PubMed

Randomized, controlled, blinded trial; oral rehydration alone, or plus LGG 10 billion or 1 trillion CFU twice daily for at least 7 days or until diarrhea stopped (Basu et al. 2009, J Clin Gastroenterol)

559 children admitted to hospital with acute watery diarrhea: 185 controls, 188 and 186 on the two LGG doses

Both LGG doses lowered diarrhea frequency and duration, the need for IV fluids and hospital stay compared with rehydration alone, with no difference between the two doses. No complications were seen. The control group did not get a placebo.

6
LGG Meta-Analysis: Antibiotic-Associated Diarrhea in Children and Adults
PubMed

Systematic review and meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials (1,499 participants) of LGG versus placebo or no added treatment in people taking antibiotics, graded with GRADE (Szajewska et al. 2015, Aliment Pharmacol Ther)

Children and adults taking antibiotics; 11 trials with 1,308 participants in the main analysis

Antibiotic-associated diarrhea fell from 22.4% to 12.3% with LGG (RR 0.49; low quality of evidence). The reduction was significant in children (5 trials, 445 participants, RR 0.48; moderate quality) but not in adults overall (6 trials, 863 participants, RR 0.48), except in a subset taking antibiotics for H. pylori eradication.

7
Perinatal LGG and Infant Eczema in Germany
PubMed

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial; LGG 5 billion CFU twice daily from 4 to 6 weeks before delivery and for 6 months after birth (Kopp et al. 2008, Pediatrics)

105 pregnant women from families with allergic disease; 94 families completed

Atopic dermatitis at age 2 was 28% with LGG and 27.3% with placebo (RR 0.96), with no difference in severity. Recurrent wheezing bronchitis was more common with LGG (26% versus 9.1%).

8
LGG in Daycare Children
PubMed

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial; milk with or without LGG for 7 months, average 260 mL a day (Hatakka et al. 2001, BMJ)

571 healthy children aged 1 to 6 in 18 Helsinki daycare centers

Children on LGG milk had 16% fewer days absent for illness (4.9 versus 5.8 days) and 17% fewer had respiratory infections with complications. After adjusting for age, these differences were no longer statistically significant; the authors called the effects modest.

9
Pooled Trials of LGG for Recurring Abdominal Pain in Children
PubMed

Meta-analysis of 3 randomized controlled trials of LGG in children with abdominal pain-related functional gut disorders (Horvath et al. 2011, Aliment Pharmacol Ther)

290 children; 167 in the IBS subgroup

LGG raised the share of children whose pain eased (RR 1.31; NNT 7), more so in IBS (RR 1.70; NNT 4). No difference for functional abdominal pain or functional dyspepsia alone.

10
LGG in 281 Children Attending Daycare: 3-Month Placebo-Controlled RCT
PubMed

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial; LGG at 1 billion CFU in 100 mL fermented milk versus the same post-pasteurized milk without LGG, for 3 months; gastrointestinal infections (RR 0.63), vomiting and diarrheal episodes did not differ significantly from placebo (Hojsak et al. 2010, Clin Nutr)

281 children attending daycare centers (139 LGG, 142 placebo)

LGG lowered the risk of upper respiratory tract infections (RR 0.66; NNT 5) and of respiratory infections lasting more than 3 days (RR 0.57), with fewer days of respiratory symptoms. Lower respiratory tract infections did not differ.

Side effects and drug interactions

Common Potential side effects

In the Cochrane review of children taking antibiotics, none of the 16 trials (2,455 children) that reported adverse events documented a serious adverse event attributable to probiotics; that review pooled many strains.
Adverse events reported in the pediatric probiotic trials pooled by Cochrane included rash, nausea, gas, bloating and abdominal pain, and most occurred in the control groups.
Serious infections have been reported in severely ill or immunocompromised children, including those with central venous catheters; avoid probiotics in these settings unless the medical team advises them.
Some products contain milk-derived ingredients; check the label if you have a milk allergy.
Pregnancy: LGG was given to pregnant women in the eczema trials; ask your obstetrician before use.

Important Drug interactions

Antibiotics: LGG is often taken during an antibiotic course; ask your pharmacist about spacing it from antibiotic doses.
Immunosuppressants and chemotherapy: people with weakened immune systems or central venous catheters should use probiotics only with medical advice because of the rare risk of serious infection.

Frequently asked questions about Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG)

What is Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG used for?

LGG is a probiotic strain studied mainly for digestive health, especially in children taking antibiotics, and for hospital-acquired infections in children. The 'GG' identifies this specific strain; results for other L. rhamnosus strains do not carry over.

What is the recommended dosage of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG?

Trials used a wide range: 1 billion CFU a day in fermented milk in a hospital trial, and 10 billion CFU twice daily in acute diarrhea trials. A Cochrane review pooled across strains named L. rhamnosus or S. boulardii at 5 to 40 billion CFU a day for children on antibiotics, without naming GG. Follow the product label or your clinician's advice.

Is LGG good for kids?

LGG is among the better-studied probiotics in children, mainly for antibiotic-related diarrhea, where a European pediatric expert group recommends it for at-risk children. For acute stomach bugs, a large US trial found no benefit. Check with a pediatrician for infants and young children.

When should I take LGG?

Trials gave LGG once or twice a day, for example in fermented milk or as a powder. If you take it with antibiotics, ask your pharmacist how to time it around the antibiotic doses.

What is Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG?

Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG; ATCC 53103) is a probiotic strain first patented in 1989. Its pili carry a mucus-binding protein that helps it cling to the gut lining.

Is Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG safe, and does it have side effects?

Side effects and cautions reported for Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG include: In the Cochrane review of children taking antibiotics, none of the 16 trials (2,455 children) that reported adverse events documented a serious adverse event attributable to probiotics; that review pooled many strains. It may also interact with some medications. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG is not right for everyone, so check with a healthcare provider first if you are pregnant or breastfeeding, have a medical condition, or take prescription medication.

Does Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG interact with any medications?

Possible interactions include: Antibiotics: LGG is often taken during an antibiotic course; ask your pharmacist about spacing it from antibiotic doses. Immunosuppressants and chemotherapy: people with weakened immune systems or central venous catheters should use probiotics only with medical advice because of… If you take prescription medication, check with a pharmacist or doctor before using it.

How strong is the scientific evidence for Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG?

NutraSmarts rates the evidence for Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG as Strong (4 out of 5). It is backed by 10 study summaries and 19 cited references summarized on this page. A higher rating reflects more, larger, and better-designed human studies.

References(19 citations)

Evidence ratings on NutraSmarts are based on the totality of human clinical research, with emphasis on randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews. The references below directly support claims made throughout this page.

  1. Hojsak I, Abdović S, Szajewska H, Milosević M, Krznarić Z, Kolacek S. Lactobacillus GG in the prevention of nosocomial gastrointestinal and respiratory tract infections. Pediatrics. 2010;125(5):e1171-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2568.PubMedUsed to support: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 742 hospitalized children: LGG at 1 billion CFU a day in fermented milk reduced hospital-acquired gastrointestinal infections (RR 0.40; NNT 15) and respiratory tract infections (RR 0.38; NNT 30); hospital stay did not differ.
  2. Schnadower D, Tarr PI, Casper TC, Gorelick MH, Dean JM, O'Connell KJ, Mahajan P, Levine AC, Bhatt SR, Roskind CG, Powell EC, Rogers AJ, Vance C, Sapien RE, Olsen CS, Metheney M, Dickey VP, Hall-Moore C, Freedman SB. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG versus Placebo for Acute Gastroenteritis in Children. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(21):2002-2014. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1802598.PubMedUsed to support: PECARN trial in 971 children aged 3 months to 4 years with acute gastroenteritis: 5 days of LGG 10 billion CFU twice daily did not reduce moderate-to-severe gastroenteritis (11.8% versus 12.6%), diarrhea or vomiting duration, daycare absence or household spread compared with placebo.
  3. Freedman SB, Williamson-Urquhart S, Farion KJ, Gouin S, Willan AR, Poonai N, Hurley K, Sherman PM, Finkelstein Y, Lee BE, Pang XL, Chui L, Schnadower D, Xie J, Gorelick M, Schuh S, PERC PROGUT Trial Group. Multicenter Trial of a Combination Probiotic for Children with Gastroenteritis. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(21):2015-2026. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1802597.PubMedUsed to support: Randomized, double-blind trial at six Canadian pediatric emergency departments in 886 children aged 3 to 48 months with gastroenteritis: L. rhamnosus R0011 and L. helveticus R0052, 4 billion CFU twice daily for 5 days, did not reduce moderate-to-severe gastroenteritis within 14 days (26.1% vs 24.7%, P=0.72). Diarrhea duration (52.5 vs 55.5 hours), vomiting duration, unscheduled visits and adverse events (34.8% vs 38.7%) did not differ. Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others. The trial registry (NCT01853124) names the product Lacidofil (95% R0011, 5% R0052) and lists Institut Rosell Lallemand as an industry collaborator. It did not test the GG strain.
  4. Kalliomäki M, Salminen S, Poussa T, Arvilommi H, Isolauri E. Probiotics and prevention of atopic disease: 4-year follow-up of a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2003;361(9372):1869-71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13490-3.PubMedUsed to support: 4-year follow-up of the perinatal LGG trial: atopic eczema in 14 of 53 children given LGG versus 25 of 54 given placebo (RR 0.57); skin prick test results did not differ.
  5. Basu S, Paul DK, Ganguly S, Chatterjee M, Chandra PK. Efficacy of high-dose Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in controlling acute watery diarrhea in Indian children: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;43(3):208-13. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31815a5780.PubMedUsed to support: Randomized, controlled, blinded trial in 559 Indian children with acute watery diarrhea: LGG at 10 billion or 1 trillion CFU twice daily with rehydration lowered diarrhea frequency and duration, IV fluid needs and hospital stay versus rehydration alone, with no difference between doses.
  6. Goldenberg JZ, Lytvyn L, Steurich J, Parkin P, Mahant S, Johnston BC. Probiotics for the prevention of pediatric antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(12):CD004827. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004827.pub4.PubMedUsed to support: Cochrane review of 23 trials in 3,938 children: probiotics reduced antibiotic-associated diarrhea from 19% to 8% (RR 0.46; moderate-quality evidence). The authors named L. rhamnosus or S. boulardii at 5 to 40 billion CFU a day as possibly appropriate (GG not named) and noted serious adverse events in severely ill or immunocompromised children, including those with central venous catheters.
  7. Hatakka K, Savilahti E, Pönkä A, Meurman JH, Poussa T, Näse L, Saxelin M, Korpela R. Effect of long term consumption of probiotic milk on infections in children attending day care centres: double blind, randomised trial. BMJ. 2001;322(7298):1327. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7298.1327.PubMedUsed to support: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 7-month trial in 571 daycare children in Helsinki: LGG milk led to 16% fewer illness absence days and a 17% relative reduction in respiratory infections with complications; age-adjusted differences were not statistically significant, and the authors described the effects as modest.
  8. Szajewska H, Canani RB, Guarino A, Hojsak I, Indrio F, Kolacek S, Orel R, Shamir R, Vandenplas Y, van Goudoever JB, Weizman Z, ESPGHAN Working Group for ProbioticsPrebiotics. Probiotics for the Prevention of Antibiotic-Associated Diarrhea in Children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2016;62(3):495-506. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001081.PubMedUsed to support: ESPGHAN Working Group recommendations: if a probiotic is used to prevent antibiotic-associated diarrhea in children with risk factors, the group recommends L. rhamnosus GG or S. boulardii (moderate quality of evidence, strong recommendation).
  9. Capurso L. Thirty Years of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG: A Review. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019;53 Suppl 1:S1-S41. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001170.PubMedUsed to support: Narrative review of 30 years of LGG research: LGG was patented in 1989 for surviving stomach acid and bile and adhering to gut cells, and has a large body of trial data across digestive, respiratory and allergy uses.
  10. Szajewska H, Guarino A, Hojsak I, Indrio F, Kolacek S, Orel R, Salvatore S, Shamir R, van Goudoever JB, Vandenplas Y, Weizman Z, Zalewski BM, Working Group on Probiotics and Prebiotics of the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition. Use of Probiotics for the Management of Acute Gastroenteritis in Children: An Update. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2020;71(2):261-269. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002751.PubMedUsed to support: ESPGHAN 2020 update on probiotics for acute gastroenteritis in children: no strain had two high-quality positive trials; LGG received a weak recommendation with very low certainty of evidence, and L. helveticus R0052 plus L. rhamnosus R0011 a strong recommendation against.
  11. Hojsak I, Szajewska H, Canani RB, Guarino A, Indrio F, Kolacek S, Orel R, Shamir R, Vandenplas Y, van Goudoever JB, Weizman Z, ESPGHAN Working Group for Probiotics/Prebiotics. Probiotics for the Prevention of Nosocomial Diarrhea in Children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2018;66(1):3-9. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001637.PubMedUsed to support: ESPGHAN Working Group recommendation: if probiotics are considered for preventing hospital-acquired diarrhea in children, the group recommends L. rhamnosus GG.
  12. Kalliomäki M, Salminen S, Arvilommi H, Kero P, Koskinen P, Isolauri E. Probiotics in primary prevention of atopic disease: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2001;357(9262):1076-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04259-8.PubMedUsed to support: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial: LGG given to mothers from allergy-prone families before delivery and to their infants for 6 months; atopic eczema at age 2 in 15 of 64 (23%) on LGG versus 31 of 68 (46%) on placebo (RR 0.51).
  13. Kopp MV, Hennemuth I, Heinzmann A, Urbanek R. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of probiotics for primary prevention: no clinical effects of Lactobacillus GG supplementation. Pediatrics. 2008;121(4):e850-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1492.PubMedUsed to support: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 105 pregnant women from allergy-prone families: LGG 5 billion CFU twice daily before and 6 months after birth did not reduce atopic dermatitis at age 2 (28% versus 27.3%) and was linked to more recurrent wheezing bronchitis (26% versus 9.1%).
  14. Horvath A, Dziechciarz P, Szajewska H. Meta-analysis: Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG for abdominal pain-related functional gastrointestinal disorders in childhood. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;33(12):1302-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04665.x.PubMedUsed to support: Meta-analysis of 3 randomized trials in 290 children: LGG increased treatment responders versus placebo (RR 1.31; NNT 7), more so in the IBS subgroup (RR 1.70; NNT 4), with no difference for functional abdominal pain or functional dyspepsia.
  15. Kankainen M, Paulin L, Tynkkynen S, von Ossowski I, Reunanen J, Partanen P, Satokari R, Vesterlund S, Hendrickx AP, Lebeer S, De Keersmaecker SC, Vanderleyden J, Hämäläinen T, Laukkanen S, Salovuori N, Ritari J, Alatalo E, Korpela R, Mattila-Sandholm T, Lassig A, Hatakka K, Kinnunen KT, Karjalainen H, Saxelin M, Laakso K, Surakka A, Palva A, Salusjärvi T, Auvinen P, de Vos WM. Comparative genomic analysis of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG reveals pili containing a human- mucus binding protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(40):17193-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908876106.PubMedUsed to support: Genome and lab study: LGG carries spaCBA pilus genes; the SpaC pilin binds human intestinal mucus, and mucus binding was lost in a spaC knockout. Several authors worked for Valio, which markets LGG.
  16. Yan F, Cao H, Cover TL, Whitehead R, Washington MK, Polk DB. Soluble proteins produced by probiotic bacteria regulate intestinal epithelial cell survival and growth. Gastroenterology. 2007;132(2):562-75. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.11.022.PubMedUsed to support: Cell and mouse tissue study: two proteins secreted by LGG, p75 and p40, activated Akt, blocked cytokine-induced death of colon lining cells and promoted their growth, and reduced TNF-induced damage in cultured mouse colon.
  17. Szajewska H, Kołodziej M. Systematic review with meta-analysis: Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea in children and adults. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015;42(10):1149-57. doi: 10.1111/apt.13404.PubMedUsed to support: Meta-analysis of 12 randomized trials (1,499 participants): LGG versus placebo or no added treatment lowered antibiotic-associated diarrhea from 22.4% to 12.3% (11 trials, RR 0.49, low quality of evidence). The effect was significant in children (5 trials, n = 445, RR 0.48, moderate quality) but not in adults overall (6 trials, n = 863), except in a subset on H. pylori eradication therapy.
  18. Hojsak I, Snovak N, Abdović S, Szajewska H, Misak Z, Kolacek S. Lactobacillus GG in the prevention of gastrointestinal and respiratory tract infections in children who attend day care centers: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Clin Nutr. 2010;29(3):312-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2009.09.008.PubMedUsed to support: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 281 children attending daycare: LGG at 1 billion CFU in 100 mL fermented milk for 3 months lowered the risk of upper respiratory tract infections (RR 0.66; NNT 5) and of respiratory infections lasting more than 3 days (RR 0.57) and reduced days with respiratory symptoms; gastrointestinal infections (RR 0.63) and vomiting did not differ significantly.
  19. U.S. National Library of Medicine, ClinicalTrials.gov. Impact of Emergency Department Probiotic Treatment of Pediatric Gastroenteritis: Randomized Controlled Trial (PROGUT, NCT01853124), study record. ClinicalTrials.gov. 2026;Registry record NCT01853124, accessed 2026..SourceUsed to support: Trial registry record, not PubMed-indexed, read in 2026. It names the study product Lacidofil: one sachet twice daily for 5 days, each with at least 4 billion CFU of L. rhamnosus Rosell-11 (95%) and L. helveticus Rosell-52 (5%), against a maltodextrin placebo. It lists Institut Rosell Lallemand as an industry collaborator alongside the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.