Probiokid® (Bifidobacterium infantis R0033, Bifidobacterium bifidum R0071 and Lactobacillus helveticus R0052)

Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis R0033 + Bifidobacterium bifidum R0071 + Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 (combined formulation)
Evidence Level
Limited
3 Clinical Trials
5 Documented Benefits
2/5 Evidence Score

Probiokid® is a three-strain probiotic from Lallemand Health Solutions (formerly Institut Rosell) that combines Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis R0033, Bifidobacterium bifidum R0071 and Lactobacillus helveticus R0052. Probiokid is the maker's non-commercial name; the formula, with added fructooligosaccharides, was first sold in China and is studied mainly in children. In a 3-month placebo-controlled pilot trial in 135 children aged 3 to 7 who had been ill often the winter before, fewer children on the formula had any illness episode or missed a school day. In 132 formula-fed infants, gut secretory IgA held steady on the strains while it fell on placebo, a marker result; gut bacteria did not differ. Many other studies were open-label or published only in Chinese, and a review of them was written by the maker's employees. Ask a pediatrician before giving any probiotic to an infant.

Studied Dose One sachet a day (made to supply at least 3 billion CFU, with 750 mg of fructooligosaccharides in the commercial formula) for 3 months in children aged 3 to 7; one sachet a day added to formula for 4 weeks in infants aged 3.5 to 6 months.
Active Compound Live Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis R0033 (Rosell-33, CNCM I-3424), Bifidobacterium bifidum R0071 (Rosell-71, CNCM I-3426) and Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 (Rosell-52, CNCM I-1722). In the commercial formula reviewed by the maker, each sachet carries 750 mg of fructooligosaccharides and is made to supply at least 3 billion CFU at the end of shelf life. In one infant trial's sachet, R0052 made up most of the count (9.6 billion CFU, against about 0.14 billion CFU each of R0033 and R0071).

Benefits

Illness episodes and sick days in young school-age children

In a 3-month placebo-controlled pilot trial in 135 children aged 3 to 7 who had at least three ear, nose and throat, respiratory or digestive illnesses the winter before, a daily sachet of the three strains with fructooligosaccharides lowered the share with any illness episode, the main outcome (51.6% vs 68.5%, a borderline result), and with a sick day off school (25.8% vs 42.5%). It is one small trial.

Gut secretory IgA levels in formula-fed infants

In 132 healthy formula-fed infants aged 3.5 to 6 months, a daily sachet of the three strains in formula for 4 weeks kept stool secretory IgA steady while it fell on placebo. Saliva IgA did not differ, and gut bacteria composition, part of the registered main outcome, did not differ either. Secretory IgA is a marker, not a measure of fewer illnesses.

Growth and digestive tolerance in healthy infants

In the 4-week trial in 132 formula-fed infants, growth did not differ from placebo and all adverse events were mild and judged unrelated to the product; infants on the strains had more stools a day in the last week. In a separate 221-infant trial, each strain given alone for 8 weeks matched placebo for growth and adverse events.

Stool outcomes in open-label add-on studies of Chinese children

A review written by the maker's employees pooled 12 Chinese studies in which children with diarrhea got the formula alongside standard care and reported fewer unresolved cases (risk ratio 0.31). None used a placebo, blinding was unclear in all of them, and the review found signs of publication bias, so these results are weak support.

Healthy days in stressed students: B. bifidum R0071 alone

This was a single-strain trial, not the three-strain formula. In 581 students during exam stress, B. bifidum R0071 for 6 weeks gave a larger share of days free of cold or flu symptoms than placebo, while B. infantis R0033 alone and L. helveticus R0052 alone did not differ from placebo. A maker employee was a coauthor.

Mechanism of action

1

Cytokine signals in rats (animal work)

In two rat infection models, the three strains with short-chain fructooligosaccharides lowered blood levels of the inflammatory cytokines IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α. For most cytokines the blend averaged the effects of the single strains. These are animal results and do not show a benefit in children.

2

Infant gut bacteria and stool immune markers (single strains)

In healthy infants given one strain each for 8 weeks, gut bacteria stayed closer to their starting profile than on placebo, the IL-10 to IL-12 ratio rose with R0033, and the TNF-α to IL-10 ratio rose with R0052. These stool markers came from single strains, not the three-strain blend, and were not tied to a health outcome.

3

A blend dominated by R0052 by count

In the infant trial sachet, L. helveticus R0052 supplied 9.6 billion CFU and each bifidobacterium about 0.14 billion CFU, and the commercial formula adds a prebiotic fiber. Trials tested the blend, so results cannot be credited to one strain, and results for Lacidofil or Cerebiome, which share R0052, do not carry over.

Clinical trials

1
Children With Frequent Winter Illness, 3 Months
PubMed

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter pilot trial; daily synbiotic of L. helveticus R0052, B. infantis R0033 and B. bifidum R0071 with fructooligosaccharides (one sachet a day per the maker's review) during a winter; the abstract does not name the funder or maker, though PubMed indexes it as having non-government research support (Cazzola et al. 2010, Ther Adv Respir Dis)

135 otherwise healthy children aged 3 to 7 (mean age 4.1) in France who had at least three ear, nose and throat, respiratory or digestive illness episodes the previous winter; 62 synbiotic, 73 placebo.

The main outcome favored the synbiotic: 51.6% had at least one illness episode versus 68.5% on placebo (relative risk reduction 25%, 95% CI 0.6% to 44.3%, p = 0.045). At least one sick day off school, a parent-diary outcome that was not the main outcome, was recorded in 25.8% versus 42.5% (p = 0.043). No treatment-related side effects were found. The probiotic was not tested without the prebiotic.

2
Formula-Fed Infants, 4 Weeks: Secretory IgA
PubMed

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (NCT02317406, sponsored by Biostime); one sachet a day in formula holding 9.6 billion CFU of R0052 and about 0.14 billion CFU each of R0033 and R0071 per the protocol, products supplied by Lallemand; one author works for Lallemand and three for Biostime (Xiao et al. 2019, Benef Microbes)

132 healthy formula-fed infants aged 3.5 to 6 months in China (66 probiotic, 66 placebo).

Gut microbiota composition, part of the registered main outcome, did not differ between groups; the registered stool L. helveticus count is not reported in the abstract. Stool secretory IgA held steady on the probiotic and fell on placebo (p = 0.0044); saliva IgA did not differ (p = 0.28). Stools per day were higher on the probiotic in the last week in the per-protocol group. Growth did not differ, and no serious adverse event was reported.

3
Young Children With Frequent Respiratory Illness, Open-Label
PubMed

Open-label before-and-after study without a control group, indexed as observational; a synbiotic of 5 billion CFU of Rosell-52 (named L. acidophilus), Rosell-33 and Rosell-71 for up to 9 months (Stojković et al. 2016, Srp Arh Celok Lek)

Children younger than five who had been hospitalized, grouped by recurrent respiratory illness, wheezing or both (78 children per the maker's review).

Respiratory illness became less frequent than before supplementation and serum total IgA rose over the first 3 months, with total IgE lower after 9 months. Without a placebo or control group, these changes cannot be separated from children growing older or from the season.

Side effects and drug interactions

Common Potential side effects

In 132 formula-fed infants given the three strains for 4 weeks, no serious adverse event was reported, and all adverse events were mild and judged unrelated to the product.
In 135 children aged 3 to 7 given the synbiotic for 3 months, no treatment-related side effects were found; the maker's review lists 2 serious adverse events (abdominal pain on placebo, an ear infection on the synbiotic) and 24 adverse events in 20 children, mostly expected respiratory or digestive events.
In 221 healthy infants aged 3 to 12 months given one of the three strains alone for 8 weeks, growth and the number of adverse events matched placebo, and no serious adverse event was reported.
Serious adverse events from probiotics have been reported in severely ill or immunocompromised children, including those with central venous catheters; avoid live probiotics in these settings unless the medical team advises them.
Preterm infants: the FDA has warned that preterm infants given probiotic products are at risk of invasive, potentially fatal infection, and no probiotic is FDA-approved as a drug for infants. Ask a pediatrician before giving any probiotic to an infant, especially one born early or ill.

Important Drug interactions

Antibiotics: they may reduce the number of live bacteria; ask your pharmacist how to time a probiotic around antibiotic doses.
Immunosuppressants and chemotherapy: people with weakened immune systems should take live probiotics only with medical advice.
No drug interaction studies of this formula have been published. Tell your pediatrician or pharmacist about any supplement a child takes.

Frequently asked questions about Probiokid® (Bifidobacterium infantis R0033, Bifidobacterium bifidum R0071 and Lactobacillus helveticus R0052)

What is Probiokid?

Probiokid® is the maker's non-commercial name for a three-strain probiotic from Lallemand Health Solutions: Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis R0033, Bifidobacterium bifidum R0071 and Lactobacillus helveticus R0052. The commercial formula adds fructooligosaccharides, a prebiotic fiber, and has been sold in China under the Biostime name and in other countries.

Does Probiokid support children's natural defenses?

One 3-month placebo-controlled pilot trial in 135 children aged 3 to 7 found fewer children with any illness episode and fewer with a sick day off school on the formula. An infant trial found steadier gut secretory IgA, a marker only. Larger independent placebo-controlled trials are lacking.

How much Probiokid was used in studies?

Trials used one sachet a day: for 3 months in children aged 3 to 7, and added to formula for 4 weeks in infants aged 3.5 to 6 months. The commercial sachet is made to supply at least 3 billion CFU at the end of shelf life. Follow the product label.

Is Probiokid suitable for babies?

A 4-week trial of the three strains in healthy formula-fed infants aged 3.5 to 6 months and an 8-week trial of each strain alone in infants from 3 months found no difference from placebo in growth and no serious adverse events. The FDA warns that probiotics can cause serious infections in preterm infants. Ask a pediatrician before giving any probiotic to an infant, especially one born early or ill.

Is Probiokid the same as Lacidofil or Cerebiome?

No. All three contain L. helveticus R0052 from Lallemand, but Lacidofil pairs it with L. rhamnosus R0011 and Cerebiome with B. longum R0175. Each blend has its own trials, and results for one do not carry over to another.

What is Probiokid used for?

Probiokid is researched primarily for Immune Support. In a 3-month placebo-controlled pilot trial in 135 children aged 3 to 7 who had at least three ear, nose and throat, respiratory or digestive illnesses the winter before, a daily sachet of the three strains with fructooligosaccharides lower…

What is the recommended dosage of Probiokid?

The clinically studied dose is One sachet a day (made to supply at least 3 billion CFU, with 750 mg of fructooligosaccharides in the commercial formula) for 3 months in children aged 3 to 7; one sachet a day added to formula for 4 weeks in infants aged 3.5 to 6 months. Always follow the product label and check with a healthcare provider for personal advice.

Is Probiokid safe, and does it have side effects?

Side effects and cautions reported for Probiokid include: In 132 formula-fed infants given the three strains for 4 weeks, no serious adverse event was reported, and all adverse events were mild and judged unrelated to the product. It may also interact with some medications. Probiokid is not right for everyone, so check with a healthcare provider first if you are pregnant or breastfeeding, have a medical condition, or take prescription medication.

Does Probiokid interact with any medications?

Possible interactions include: Antibiotics: they may reduce the number of live bacteria; ask your pharmacist how to time a probiotic around antibiotic doses. Immunosuppressants and chemotherapy: people with weakened immune systems should take live probiotics only with medical advice. If you take prescription medication, check with a pharmacist or doctor before using it.

How strong is the scientific evidence for Probiokid?

NutraSmarts rates the evidence for Probiokid as Limited (2 out of 5). It is backed by 3 study summaries and 13 cited references summarized on this page. A higher rating reflects more, larger, and better-designed human studies.

References(13 citations)

Evidence ratings on NutraSmarts are based on the totality of human clinical research, with emphasis on randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews. The references below directly support claims made throughout this page.

  1. Cazzola M, Pham-Thi N, Kerihuel JC, Durand H, Bohbot S. Efficacy of a synbiotic supplementation in the prevention of common winter diseases in children: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2010;4(5):271-8. doi: 10.1177/1753465810379010.PubMedUsed to support: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter pilot trial in 135 children aged 3 to 7 (62 synbiotic, 73 placebo) with at least three ear, nose and throat, respiratory or digestive illnesses the previous winter. A synbiotic of L. helveticus R0052, B. infantis R0033, B. bifidum R0071 and fructooligosaccharide for 3 months lowered the share with at least one illness episode (51.6% vs 68.5%, p = 0.045) and with at least one sick day off school (25.8% vs 42.5%, p = 0.043). No treatment-related side effects. The probiotic was always given with the prebiotic. The abstract does not name the funder or the product maker; PubMed indexes it as having non-government research support.
  2. Xiao L, Gong C, Ding Y, Ding G, Xu X, Deng C, Ze X, Malard P, Ben X. Probiotics maintain intestinal secretory immunoglobulin A levels in healthy formula-fed infants: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Benef Microbes. 2019;10(7):729-739. doi: 10.3920/BM2019.0025.PubMedUsed to support: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 132 healthy formula-fed infants aged 3.5 to 6 months given B. infantis R0033, B. bifidum R0071 and L. helveticus R0052 in formula once a day for 4 weeks. Stool secretory IgA stayed level on the probiotic and fell on placebo (p = 0.0044); saliva IgA did not differ (p = 0.28). Microbiota composition and growth did not differ; stools per day were higher on the probiotic in the last week (per protocol). No serious adverse events; all adverse events were mild and unrelated. One author is from Lallemand Health Solutions and three are from Biostime.
  3. Xiao L, Ding G, Ding Y, Deng C, Ze X, Chen L, Zhang Y, Song L, Yan H, Liu F, Ben X. Effect of probiotics on digestibility and immunity in infants: A study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(14):e5953. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005953.PubMedUsed to support: Published protocol of the same infant trial (registered NCT02317406). Its main planned outcome was change in stool microbiota, particularly B. bifidum. Each 1.5 g active sachet, supplied by Lallemand, held 1.425 x 10^8 CFU of B. infantis R0033, 1.425 x 10^8 CFU of B. bifidum R0071 and 9.6 x 10^9 CFU of L. helveticus R0052; the placebo was potato starch. Funding was from Chinese public grants; Biostime is the registered sponsor.
  4. U.S. National Library of Medicine, ClinicalTrials.gov. Effect of Probiotics on the Digestibility and Immunity in Infants (NCT02317406), study record. ClinicalTrials.gov. 2026;Registry record NCT02317406, accessed 2026..SourceUsed to support: Trial registry record, not PubMed-indexed, read in 2026. Lead sponsor: Biostime Institute of Nutrition and Care. Primary outcomes were gut flora composition and stool L. helveticus counts over 4 weeks; stool number and form were secondary. The arms were a 1.5 g Biostime probiotic sachet or a matching placebo once a day for 4 weeks; 133 enrolled.
  5. Stojković A, Simović A, Bogdanović Z, Banković D, Poskurica M. Clinical trial/experimental study (consort compliant): Optimal time period to achieve the effects on synbiotic-controlled wheezing and respiratory infections in young children. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2016;144(1-2):38-45. doi: 10.2298/sarh1602038s.PubMedUsed to support: Study without a control group (indexed as observational) in previously hospitalized children younger than five, given a synbiotic of 5 x 10^9 Lactobacillus acidophilus Rosell-52, Bifidobacterium infantis Rosell-33 and Bifidobacterium bifidum Rosell-71 for up to 9 months. Respiratory illness became less frequent than before supplementation and serum total IgA rose over the first 3 months; total IgE was lower after 9 months. With no comparison group, the changes cannot be attributed to the product.
  6. Manzano S, De Andrés J, Castro I, Rodríguez JM, Jiménez E, Espinosa-Martos I. Safety and tolerance of three probiotic strains in healthy infants: a multi-centre randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Benef Microbes. 2017;8(4):569-578. doi: 10.3920/BM2017.0009.PubMedUsed to support: Other product (single strains, not the blend). Multicenter randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 221 healthy full-term infants aged 3 to 12 months, given placebo or one of B. infantis R0033, B. bifidum R0071 or L. helveticus R0052 (3 x 10^9 CFU a day) for 8 weeks. Changes in weight, length and head circumference were equivalent in all four groups, the total number of adverse events was equivalent, and no serious adverse events occurred. The abstract does not state funding.
  7. De Andrés J, Manzano S, García C, Rodríguez JM, Espinosa-Martos I, Jiménez E. Modulatory effect of three probiotic strains on infants' gut microbial composition and immunological parameters on a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised study. Benef Microbes. 2018;9(4):573-584. doi: 10.3920/BM2017.0132.PubMedUsed to support: Other product (single strains). Stool analysis from the same 221-infant single-strain trial. Gut bacteria in the probiotic groups showed no notable change over 8 weeks while the placebo group shifted toward an older-infant profile; the IL-10 to IL-12 ratio rose with R0033 and the TNF-α to IL-10 ratio rose with R0052. These are marker results without a health outcome.
  8. Langkamp-Henken B, Rowe CC, Ford AL, Christman MC, Nieves C Jr, Khouri L, Specht GJ, Girard SA, Spaiser SJ, Dahl WJ. Bifidobacterium bifidum R0071 results in a greater proportion of healthy days and a lower percentage of academically stressed students reporting a day of cold/flu: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Br J Nutr. 2015;113(3):426-34. doi: 10.1017/S0007114514003997.PubMedUsed to support: Other product (single strains). Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 6-week trial in 581 academically stressed students given L. helveticus R0052, B. infantis R0033, B. bifidum R0071 or placebo. B. bifidum R0071 gave a greater share of healthy days and fewer students reporting at least one day of cold or flu than placebo; R0033 and R0052 alone did not differ from placebo on either outcome. One author is from Lallemand Health Solutions.
  9. Chen K, Zhang X, Jin S, Zhong J, Chen H, Yue G, Cheng Y, Peng R, Fang Z, Liu F, Lu Z, Zhao L, Hu R, Tao X, He Q, Liu C. Precision synbiotic intervention with 2'-fucosyllactose and infant-derived Bifidobacterium modulates gut-immune axis and reduces disease risk in toddlers: a randomized controlled trial. Front Nutr. 2026;13:1856180. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2026.1856180.PubMedUsed to support: Other product (two strains without R0052). Double-blind, placebo-controlled three-arm trial in 390 healthy toddlers aged 1 to 3: B. infantis R0033 plus B. bifidum R0071 at 1.5 billion CFU each a day (corrected in a published erratum, PMID 42819078, from the 1.5 x 10^10 CFU printed in the original abstract), with or without 1.0 g of 2'-fucosyllactose, or maltodextrin for 12 weeks. The abstract reports that the version with 2'-fucosyllactose lowered upper respiratory infection incidence (85.4% to 55.4%), while the two strains alone lowered only eczema. Products were supplied by Biostime and several authors are from H&H Group.
  10. Tremblay A, Xu X, Colee J, Tompkins TA. Efficacy of a Multi-Strain Probiotic Formulation in Pediatric Populations: A Comprehensive Review of Clinical Studies. Nutrients. 2021;13(6):1908. doi: 10.3390/nu13061908.PubMedUsed to support: Review by three Lallemand Health Solutions employees and an independent statistician. States that Probiokid (non-commercial name; sold as Biostime) combines L. helveticus Rosell-52, B. infantis Rosell-33 and B. bifidum Rosell-71 (CNCM I-1722, I-3424 and I-3426) with 750 mg of fructooligosaccharides per sachet (the review states all included studies used this formulation), made to supply at least 3 billion CFU at end of shelf life, and has been sold in over 28 countries since 2002. Of 28 pediatric studies, most were in Chinese; 12 Chinese diarrhea studies added the formula to standard care without a placebo, with unclear blinding and signs of publication bias (pooled risk ratio 0.31 for unresolved diarrhea). It reports FDA GRAS no-questions status for infant formula use.
  11. Cazzola M, Tompkins TA, Matera MG. Immunomodulatory impact of a synbiotic in T(h)1 and T(h)2 models of infection. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2010;4(5):259-70. doi: 10.1177/1753465810379009.PubMedUsed to support: Animal study. In Wistar rats given the three strains with short-chain fructooligosaccharide for 2 weeks before an E. coli or hookworm challenge, blood IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α were lower. For most cytokines the combination averaged the single-strain effects, with apparent synergy only for IL-4 and IL-10. No human outcomes.
  12. Goldenberg JZ, Lytvyn L, Steurich J, Parkin P, Mahant S, Johnston BC. Probiotics for the prevention of pediatric antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(12):CD004827. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004827.pub4.PubMedUsed to support: Cochrane review of pediatric probiotic trials, pooled across strains. None of 16 trials (2455 children) that reported adverse events found serious events attributable to probiotics, but serious adverse events have been seen in severely debilitated or immunocompromised children, including those with central venous catheters, and the authors advise avoiding probiotics in at-risk children. It did not test Probiokid.
  13. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA Raises Concerns About Probiotic Products Sold for Use in Hospitalized Preterm Infants. FDA News Release. 2023;Press announcement, October 26, 2023; accessed 2026..SourceUsed to support: Official FDA statement, not PubMed-indexed, read in 2026. Preterm infants given probiotic products are at risk of invasive, potentially fatal infection; FDA reported one infant death in 2023 and more than two dozen other US adverse events since 2018, and states it has not approved any probiotic as a drug or biological product for infants of any age.