Evidence Level
Limited
5 Clinical Trials
8 Documented Benefits
2/5 Evidence Score

L-glutamine is the most abundant amino acid in the body and the primary metabolic fuel for enterocytes (intestinal cells), supplying 60-70% of their energy. It's conditionally essential during stress states (illness, trauma, intense exercise) when endogenous synthesis fails to meet demand. The strongest clinical evidence sits in medical settings rather than in supplement use: a pharmaceutical-grade prescription form is FDA approved for sickle cell disease, and one 106-patient trial found a large benefit in post-infectious IBS-D. The hospital nutrition story is weaker than it once looked, because the largest burn trial (1,209 patients) found no benefit and the largest intensive care trial (1,223 patients) found higher mortality. Important honest caveat: the popular 5-10 g/day 'leaky gut' dose appears to be below the effective dose for measurable intestinal permeability improvement (which requires >30 g/day short-term). Athletic recovery evidence is mixed.

Studied Dose Gut barrier: 15 g/day (3x5g); permeability studies used more than 30 g/day for under 2 weeks.
Active Compound L-glutamine (free amino acid), the L-isomer being the active form; some products use glutamine peptides (e.g., alanyl-glutamine) for stability.

Benefits

IBS-D and post-infectious IBS — strongest gut evidence

In post-infectious diarrhea-predominant IBS, 15 g/day (5 g three times daily) over 8 weeks produced a striking effect: 79.6% of the glutamine group achieved a >50-point IBS-SSS (symptom severity score) reduction vs 5.8% with placebo. The effect size is much larger than typical IBS interventions. Most relevant for IBS-D specifically (especially post-infectious onset), not all IBS subtypes. Mechanism: glutamine fuels enterocyte renewal and tight-junction protein synthesis.

Intestinal permeability — dose-dependent

Overall analysis shows NO significant effect at typical supplemental doses on gut permeability markers. Subgroup analysis: significant reduction emerges only with doses >30 g/day for durations under 2 weeks. Major implication: standard 5-10 g/day 'leaky gut' protocols are below the effective dose threshold for permeability outcomes. The exception is exercise-induced permeability. In ten recreationally active men, single doses of 0.25, 0.5 and 0.9 g per kg of fat-free mass taken two hours before a hot 60-minute run lowered a dual-sugar marker of gut leakiness versus placebo, with the biggest effect at the highest dose. Note the basis is fat-free mass, so even the low dose is roughly 14 g for a typical adult and the high dose is around 50 g. It is one small acute study in ten people, and gut symptoms themselves did not improve.

Sickle cell disease — FDA-approved indication

L-glutamine (branded as Endari®) is FDA-approved for sickle cell disease in patients ≥5 years old. At 0.3 g/kg twice daily over 48 weeks, it reduced sickle cell crises by 25% (3.0 vs 4.0 events/year), hospitalizations by 33% (2.0 vs 3.0), and shortened hospitalization duration vs placebo. Mechanism: glutamine supports NAD+/NADH redox balance in red blood cells, reducing oxidative damage and sickling triggers. Read this as a fact about a prescription medicine, not as a reason to buy a supplement. Endari is pharmaceutical-grade L-glutamine prescribed and monitored by a hematologist, the pivotal trial was funded by the manufacturer and has not been independently repeated, and about two thirds of patients in both groups were also on hydroxyurea. A tub of supplement-grade glutamine powder is not a substitute for it. Sickle cell disease is serious and nobody should self-treat it, stop or change a prescribed treatment, or copy the trial dose without their specialist.

Critical illness — caution required

A trial in 1,223 mechanically ventilated critically ill adults across 40 intensive care units found higher 28-day mortality with high-dose glutamine (32.4% versus 27.2%), and in-hospital and 6-month mortality were significantly higher. The antioxidant arm of the same trial had no effect on mortality, so the signal belongs to glutamine itself, not to the antioxidants. This reset prior enthusiasm for routine glutamine in ICU patients. European and American guidelines now caution against glutamine in shock and multi-organ failure. Burns were long treated as the surviving exception, but a separate trial in 1,209 patients with severe burns, who received glutamine through a feeding tube or by mouth, found no shortening of time to discharge alive and no improvement in survival, so that exception is now much weaker. Short bowel syndrome remains a specialist decision made by a treating team, not a self-care one.

Athletic recovery — overrated in marketing

Despite heavy marketing for muscle recovery, the trial evidence is weak. A meta-analysis that pooled 25 trials in physically active adults concluded that glutamine has no effect on aerobic performance, body composition or immune measures, and a six-week resistance training trial in 31 young adults found no extra gain in strength, torque or lean mass over placebo even at about 0.9 g per kilogram of lean tissue mass a day, far above a normal supplement serving. One small crossover in 16 people did report less soreness and faster strength recovery after eccentric exercise at about 0.3 g per kilogram per day, but a single crossover that size cannot carry the claim on its own. Glutamine stores in muscle are typically maintained adequately by dietary protein in well-fed athletes. The more plausible benefit is protection against exercise-induced gut permeability — particularly relevant for endurance athletes prone to GI distress during training.

Chemotherapy mucositis and short bowel syndrome

Used in oncology supportive care, with results that do not all point the same way. A meta-analysis of 15 randomized trials in 988 cancer patients found glutamine did not reduce how often mouth sores occurred but did reduce their severity and the number of severe cases, along with opioid use, feeding tube use and hospitalization. A separate meta-analysis of 6 trials in 441 patients with head and neck cancer found no clinical benefit from oral glutamine for radiation-induced mouth sores. Mouth-sore trials also often deliver glutamine as a rinse or a swish-and-swallow suspension aimed at the mouth lining, which is not the same exposure as swallowing a supplement drink. Glutamine also appears in specialized rehydration solutions used in short bowel syndrome, where it acts both as a sodium cotransport substrate and as fuel for the gut lining. That is a hospital application managed by a treating team, not a consumer one. Tumor-cell-uptake concerns (theoretical 'feeding cancer') are generally not supported by clinical data.

Wound healing and surgical recovery

Earlier and mostly small trials in burn and surgical patients reported faster wound healing and fewer infections, and a systematic review of 53 trials in 4,671 critically ill or major surgery patients did find fewer infectious complications with glutamine, though no reduction in deaths. That picture has since been undercut where it was strongest: a trial in 1,209 patients with severe burns found that glutamine by feeding tube did not shorten time to discharge alive and did not improve six-month survival. Almost all of this evidence comes from hospital nutrition support delivered by feeding tube or intravenously in seriously ill patients, which is not the same as swallowing supplement powder, and none of it validates glutamine for wound healing or skin appearance in otherwise healthy adults.

Sodium cotransport and oral rehydration

Glutamine functions as a sodium cotransport substrate in the small intestine, supporting fluid absorption parallel to glucose-mediated SGLT1. The absorption mechanism is real, but the hydration outcome is not. In rats given cholera toxin, both a free glutamine solution and an alanyl-glutamine dipeptide solution reduced sodium and water secretion, and in six healthy adults glutamine perfused directly into the jejunum through a tube roughly tripled water and sodium absorption. Where glutamine has been tested as something a person actually drinks, though, it has not delivered. A double-blind trial in 147 dehydrated children found a glutamine-based, glucose-free rehydration solution was no better than standard WHO oral rehydration solution for stool output, time to rehydrate, or the volume of solution needed. A hydration study in 19 healthy adults found a drink containing an alanyl-glutamine dipeptide held fluid better than plain water but no better than the same drink with electrolytes alone, and the authors concluded the electrolytes did most of the work. Glutamine-containing rehydration solutions do have a narrow specialist role in short bowel syndrome, which is a decision made by a treating team. On the evidence to date glutamine is not a hydration aid in its own right, which is why hydration is not listed as a use for it here.

Mechanism of action

1

Primary fuel for enterocytes

Glutamine supplies 60-70% of energy for small intestinal epithelial cells (enterocytes), which turn over every 3-5 days. It's the single most important nutrient for maintaining intestinal barrier integrity. Enterocytes preferentially metabolize glutamine over glucose. This is the molecular basis for the gut-related clinical applications.

2

Conditionally essential under stress

Endogenous glutamine synthesis (primarily skeletal muscle) typically meets demand. During catabolic stress — sepsis, burns, major surgery, prolonged intense exercise — demand exceeds production, depleting muscle and plasma glutamine pools. Supplementation rationale strongest in these stress states; less clear in healthy adults at rest.

3

Immune cell substrate

Lymphocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils require glutamine at rates similar to glucose. Glutamine availability affects T-cell proliferation, cytokine production, and phagocytic function. This is the rationale behind trials of glutamine for preventing infection after surgery, and it remains a rationale rather than a demonstrated consumer benefit. The largest intensive care trial of high-dose glutamine found higher mortality, and in healthy, well-fed people glutamine supplementation has not improved immune measures.

4

Nitrogen carrier and acid-base balance

Glutamine is the major non-toxic transport form for nitrogen between tissues. Renal glutamine catabolism produces ammonia for excretion, contributing to acid-base homeostasis. Plays key role in interorgan amino acid metabolism.

5

Sickle cell redox protection

Glutamine supports NAD+/NADH balance in red blood cells, reducing oxidative damage that triggers sickling. Mechanism behind FDA-approved Endari® indication. Sickle cells have reduced glutamine uptake capacity, making supraphysiologic doses necessary for therapeutic effect.

Clinical trials

1
L-Glutamine for Post-Infectious IBS-D — Foundational Clinical Trial

Double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial of oral L-glutamine for post-infectious diarrhea-predominant IBS. Outcomes measured via the IBS Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS) — a validated, well-established instrument with a >50-point reduction threshold for clinically meaningful improvement. Published in the journal Gut.

106 patients with post-infectious diarrhea-predominant IBS. 8-week intervention.

L-glutamine 5 g three times daily (15 g/day total) over 8 weeks produced a 79.6% responder rate (>50-point IBS-SSS reduction) vs only 5.8% with placebo — a striking effect size compared to most IBS interventions. The trial established post-infectious IBS-D as the strongest indication for glutamine in gut disorders and supported the biological plausibility that supplementation supports enterocyte renewal.

2
L-Glutamine for Intestinal Permeability — Dose-Response Evidence Synthesis

Evidence review and pooled analysis of clinical trials evaluating L-glutamine supplementation for intestinal permeability outcomes (the 'leaky gut' framework). Included trials assessed permeability via lactulose-mannitol ratio or related markers. Published in Amino Acids. Subgroup analyses by dose, duration, and population.

Multiple trials across various adult populations. Doses ranging from typical supplemental (5-10 g/day) to high-dose clinical use (>30 g/day).

Overall analysis showed NO significant effect on permeability at typical supplemental doses (WMD -0.00, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.03). Subgroup analysis identified a significant effect only at doses >30 g/day for short durations (<2 weeks). Major practical implication: standard 5-10 g/day 'leaky gut' protocols are below the effective dose threshold demonstrated for permeability outcomes.

3
L-Glutamine for Sickle Cell Disease — Phase 3 Pivotal Clinical Trial

Phase 3 randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial supporting FDA approval of L-glutamine (Endari®, Emmaus Medical) for sickle cell disease in 2017. Primary outcome: number of pain crises. Secondary outcomes: hospitalizations, acute chest syndrome, hospital length of stay. Published in NEJM.

230 patients ≥5 years old with sickle cell anemia or sickle β⁰-thalassemia. 48-week intervention.

L-glutamine 0.3 g/kg twice daily reduced median sickle cell crises by 25% (3.0 vs 4.0 events/year), hospitalizations by 33% (2.0 vs 3.0), and shortened hospitalization duration vs placebo. Effects emerged across the 48-week protocol. Foundation for the 2017 FDA approval and current use as a daily prescription therapy in sickle cell disease. Three limits belong alongside that: the trial was funded by the manufacturer, Emmaus Medical, and has not been independently repeated; roughly two thirds of patients in both groups were also taking hydroxyurea, so the effect is an add-on to standard care; and nausea, noncardiac chest pain, fatigue and musculoskeletal pain were more common on glutamine. This is a prescription medicine used under specialist supervision, not a supplement regimen to copy.

4
L-Glutamine in Critical Illness — REDOXS Trial

Large multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating high-dose glutamine and antioxidants in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. 2×2 factorial design with parenteral and enteral glutamine supplementation. Primary outcome: 28-day mortality. Published in NEJM. Conducted across multiple ICUs in North America and Europe.

1,223 mechanically ventilated critically ill adults across multiple ICUs. ICU-stay-duration intervention.

In the glutamine comparison, 28-day mortality was higher with glutamine (32.4% versus 27.2%, p=0.05), and in-hospital and 6-month mortality were significantly higher. The antioxidant factor had no effect on mortality (30.8% versus 28.8%, p=0.48), so the harm signal attaches to glutamine itself rather than to the antioxidants. This finding reset prior enthusiasm for routine glutamine in critical care. Guidelines in Europe and North America now caution against glutamine in shock and multi-organ failure. The burns exception has since weakened as well: a separate trial in 1,209 patients with severe burns, who received glutamine through a feeding tube or by mouth, found no shortening of hospital stay and no improvement in survival.

5
L-Glutamine for Exercise-Induced Gut Permeability

Dose-response study evaluating oral L-glutamine for prevention of exercise-induced intestinal permeability — a known issue in endurance athletes that contributes to GI distress and 'leaky gut' biomarkers during prolonged exercise. Permeability assessed via lactulose-rhamnose or related dual-sugar absorption methods.

Ten recreationally active men, each completing four trials in a crossover design: a placebo trial and three glutamine doses taken two hours before a 60-minute treadmill run at 30 degrees Celsius.

Doses of 0.25, 0.5 and 0.9 g per kg of fat-free mass all lowered the lactulose to rhamnose permeability ratio versus placebo, with the largest reduction at the highest dose. The dosing basis is fat-free mass, not body mass, so the low dose is roughly 14 g and the high dose roughly 50 g for a typical adult. Gut symptoms were low throughout and supplementation did not change them, and the results were reported as likelihoods rather than conventional significance tests in ten participants. Useful evidence that the very-high-dose threshold for permeability outcomes in the broader pooled analysis doesn't necessarily apply in the specific context of exercise-stress permeability — which may be more responsive to acute dosing strategies.

Side effects and drug interactions

Common Potential side effects

Generally well-tolerated at doses up to 30 g/day in healthy adults.
GI symptoms (bloating, gas, mild nausea) at high doses or in sensitive individuals.
Serious safety signal in critical illness: in a trial of 1,223 intensive care patients, high-dose glutamine given intravenously and by feeding tube was followed by more deaths at 28 days (32.4% versus 27.2%) and significantly more in-hospital and 6-month deaths, while the antioxidants tested alongside it had no effect on mortality. Do not take glutamine, and do not bring it in for a family member, during critical illness, shock, sepsis or multi-organ failure, and tell the treating team about any supplement already being taken.
Liver disease caution: glutamine catabolism produces ammonia — may worsen hepatic encephalopathy.
Headache or fatigue occasionally reported; resolves with dose reduction.
Pregnancy/lactation: no specific safety data for high-dose supplementation; dietary protein intake provides adequate glutamine.

Important Drug interactions

Lactulose — glutamine may compete for ammonia conversion in hepatic encephalopathy management; theoretical interaction worth monitoring in liver disease patients.
Anticonvulsants (particularly those for seizure control) — glutamine is metabolized to glutamate, an excitatory neurotransmitter; theoretical concern in seizure disorders, particularly at very high doses.
Chemotherapy — glutamine is generally safe and supportive in oncology nutrition, but consult oncologist before use. Tumor-cell-uptake concerns are not well-supported by clinical data.
Lithium — minimal direct interaction; glutamine has been suggested as adjunct in bipolar disorder but evidence is preliminary; consult prescriber.
Critical illness: glutamine is not recommended in shock or multi-organ failure by any route, whether intravenous, through a feeding tube or swallowed, after a 1,223-patient intensive care trial found higher mortality with high-dose glutamine. The burns exception has weakened as well, since a 1,209-patient trial in severe burns, giving glutamine through a feeding tube or by mouth, found no benefit on discharge time or survival. Adding glutamine to the care of a seriously ill person is a decision for the treating team, not a supplement choice.
Pregnancy and lactation — glutamine is a dietary amino acid present in protein-containing foods; supplemental doses lack pregnancy-specific safety studies; consult clinician for clinical-dose use.

Frequently asked questions about L-Glutamine

How much L-glutamine should I take?

Common doses range from 5 to 10 grams per day, sometimes higher for gut-support protocols. Worth knowing before you buy: pooled trial evidence shows no change in gut permeability at these amounts, and the only doses that shifted permeability were above 30 grams a day taken for under two weeks. Athletes often use about 5 grams after a workout, though pooled trials have not found a performance or body composition benefit at any dose. It is a nearly tasteless powder that dissolves in water.

What is L-glutamine used for?

L-glutamine is the most abundant amino acid in the body and a key fuel for intestinal cells, so it is popular for gut-lining and digestive support, immune support, and exercise recovery, especially during heavy training.

When should I take L-glutamine?

For recovery, many take it after workouts; for gut support, it is often taken on an empty stomach between meals. Timing is flexible, and splitting larger amounts into two doses is common.

Is L-glutamine safe?

For healthy people it is generally well tolerated at typical doses, and the body makes and uses large amounts every day. Two cautions matter. People with liver or kidney disease should check with a doctor first, because glutamine breakdown produces ammonia. And glutamine should not be added to the care of someone who is critically ill: a trial in 1,223 intensive care patients found higher mortality with high-dose glutamine, so that decision belongs to the treating team.

What is L-Glutamine?

L-glutamine is the most abundant amino acid in the body and the primary metabolic fuel for enterocytes (intestinal cells), supplying 60-70% of their energy. It's conditionally essential during stress states (illness, trauma, intense exercise) when endogenous synthesis fails to meet demand.

What is the recommended dosage of L-Glutamine?

The clinically studied dose is Gut barrier: 15 g/day (3x5g); permeability studies used more than 30 g/day for under 2 weeks. Always follow the product label and check with a healthcare provider for personal advice.

Is L-Glutamine safe, and does it have side effects?

For most healthy adults, L-Glutamine is well tolerated at studied doses. Reported effects can include: Generally well-tolerated at doses up to 30 g/day in healthy adults. GI symptoms (bloating, gas, mild nausea) at high doses or in sensitive individuals. It may also interact with some medications. L-Glutamine is not right for everyone, so check with a healthcare provider first if you are pregnant or breastfeeding, have a medical condition, or take prescription medication.

Does L-Glutamine interact with any medications?

Possible interactions include: Lactulose — glutamine may compete for ammonia conversion in hepatic encephalopathy management; theoretical interaction worth monitoring in liver disease patients. If you take prescription medication, check with a pharmacist or doctor before using it.

How strong is the scientific evidence for L-Glutamine?

NutraSmarts rates the evidence for L-Glutamine as Limited (2 out of 5). It is backed by 5 clinical trials and 18 cited references summarized on this page. A higher rating reflects more, larger, and better-designed human studies.

References(18 citations)

Evidence ratings on NutraSmarts are based on the totality of human clinical research, with emphasis on randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews. The references below directly support claims made throughout this page.

  1. Zhou Q, Verne ML, Fields JZ, Lefante JJ, Basra S, et al. Randomised placebo-controlled trial of dietary glutamine supplements for postinfectious irritable bowel syndrome. Gut. 2019;68(6):996-1002..PubMedUsed to support: Eight-week double-blind trial in 106 adults who developed diarrhea-predominant IBS with measured gut hyperpermeability after an intestinal infection: 5 g of glutamine three times a day produced a 50-point or greater fall in symptom severity in 79.6% of the glutamine group versus 5.8% on placebo, and normalized the urinary lactulose to mannitol ratio. The effect is unusually large for an IBS treatment, which is a reason for caution as much as for enthusiasm. It is one single-center trial whose own authors called for large trials to validate it, and it was run in post-infectious IBS with confirmed hyperpermeability, not in IBS generally and not in healthy people taking glutamine for gut maintenance.
  2. Abbasi F, Haghighat Lari MM, Khosravi GR, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials on the effects of glutamine supplementation on gut permeability in adults. Amino Acids. 2024;56(1):60..PubMedUsed to support: Pooled analysis of 10 clinical trials in 352 adults found that glutamine supplementation did not significantly change intestinal permeability overall, with a reduction appearing only in the subgroup taking more than 30 g a day for under two weeks. This is the basis for the statement that the popular 5 to 10 g leaky gut dose sits below any dose at which permeability has actually shifted. Every pooled trial gave glutamine by mouth, which is the right route for a supplement question, but the participants were people with a range of illnesses rather than healthy adults, the analysis mixes different doses, durations and permeability tests, and the positive result is a subgroup finding rather than the main result.
  3. Niihara Y, Miller ST, Kanter J, et al. A Phase 3 Trial of l-Glutamine in Sickle Cell Disease. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(3):226-235..PubMedUsed to support: Phase 3 trial in 230 patients aged 5 to 58 with sickle cell disease: pharmaceutical-grade L-glutamine at 0.3 g per kg twice daily for 48 weeks cut median pain crises from 4.0 to 3.0 and hospitalizations from 3.0 to 2.0 versus placebo, with more nausea, noncardiac chest pain and fatigue in the glutamine group. This is a prescription medicine prescribed and monitored by a specialist in a serious inherited disease, not a supplement regimen to copy. The trial was funded by the manufacturer, Emmaus Medical, has not been independently repeated, and about two thirds of both groups were also taking hydroxyurea, so the effect is an add-on to standard care.
  4. Heyland D, Muscedere J, Wischmeyer PE, et al. A randomized trial of glutamine and antioxidants in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(16):1489-97..PubMedUsed to support: Trial in 1,223 mechanically ventilated critically ill adults with multi-organ failure across 40 intensive care units: high-dose glutamine, given both intravenously and by feeding tube, was followed by more deaths at 28 days (32.4% versus 27.2%), and in-hospital and 6-month mortality were significantly higher. Glutamine also did not reduce organ failure or infections, and the antioxidant arm of the same trial had no effect on mortality, so the signal belongs to glutamine. The investigators concluded that glutamine was associated with increased mortality in these patients. The doses and the intravenous route are far removed from supplement use, but this is a signal of harm rather than a null result, and it is the reason the safety section warns against glutamine in shock and multi-organ failure.
  5. Heyland DK, Wibbenmeyer L, Pollack J, et al. A Randomized Trial of Enteral Glutamine for Treatment of Burn Injuries. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(11):1001-1010..PubMedUsed to support: Trial in 1,209 patients with severe burns: 0.5 g per kg per day of glutamine, given through a feeding tube or by mouth, did not shorten time to discharge alive (median 40 versus 38 days) and did not improve 6-month survival (17.2% versus 16.2% died). This is the largest test of the burn and wound healing claim, it was publicly funded rather than industry funded, and it was negative, which is why burns can no longer be presented as a settled exception. The setting is nutrition support for severely injured hospital patients, not supplement use in healthy people.
  6. Tao KM, Li XQ, Yang LQ, et al. Glutamine supplementation for critically ill adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(9):CD010050..PubMedUsed to support: Systematic review of 53 trials in 4,671 adults who were critically ill or having major surgery found fewer infectious complications with glutamine (risk ratio 0.79, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.87) but no clear effect on death in either the short or the long term. This is the strongest evidence behind the immune support use, and its limits matter: the patients were sick and hospitalized, a large share of the trials delivered glutamine intravenously rather than by mouth, and the reviewers themselves flagged a high risk of bias and suspected publication bias. When the analysis was restricted to the trials at low risk of bias, the infection benefit was no longer statistically significant.
  7. Ramezani Ahmadi A, Rayyani E, Bahreini M, et al. The effect of glutamine supplementation on athletic performance, body composition, and immune function: A systematic review and a meta-analysis of clinical trials. Clin Nutr. 2019;38(3):1076-1091..PubMedUsed to support: Systematic review of 47 studies in physically active adults, 25 of them pooled in meta-analysis, concluded that glutamine supplementation has no effect on aerobic performance, body composition or immune measures. This is the evidence behind the statement that muscle and recovery marketing runs well ahead of the trials. Two smaller findings did reach significance, an average weight reduction of about 1.4 kg and a fall in neutrophil counts at doses above 200 mg per kg, neither of which is the performance or immune benefit the category is sold on. It pools varied doses, durations and athlete types, which limits precision, but the direction on the marketed outcomes is consistently null.
  8. Candow DG, Chilibeck PD, Burke DG, et al. Effect of glutamine supplementation combined with resistance training in young adults. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2001;86(2):142-9..PubMedUsed to support: Six-week randomized trial in 31 young adults doing whole-body resistance training: glutamine at 0.9 g per kilogram of lean tissue mass a day, far above a normal supplement serving, produced no greater gain in strength, torque or lean tissue mass than a maltodextrin placebo, and no change in a urinary marker of muscle protein breakdown. Both groups gained about 30% on the squat and 14% on the bench press. Small and short, but it is a direct test of the muscle-building claim in healthy trainees, it used a generous dose, and it was negative.
  9. Legault Z, Bagnall N, Kimmerly DS The Influence of Oral L-Glutamine Supplementation on Muscle Strength Recovery and Soreness Following Unilateral Knee Extension Eccentric Exercise. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2015;25(5):417-26..PubMedUsed to support: Double-blind crossover trial in 16 healthy adults given 0.3 g per kg per day for 72 hours after eccentric knee extension exercise: soreness ratings were lower at 24, 48 and 72 hours and peak torque recovered faster than with placebo, with the force effect appearing larger in the men than the women. This is the one positive human result behind the recovery use. A 16-person crossover measuring short-term soreness is thin evidence, it does not measure training outcomes, and it sits against a pooled analysis of 25 trials that found no performance benefit.
  10. Pugh JN, Sage S, Hutson M, et al. Glutamine supplementation reduces markers of intestinal permeability during running in the heat in a dose-dependent manner. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2017;117(12):2569-2577..PubMedUsed to support: Crossover study in ten recreationally active men running for 60 minutes at 30 degrees Celsius: single doses of 0.25, 0.5 and 0.9 g per kg of fat-free mass taken two hours beforehand lowered a lactulose to rhamnose marker of gut leakiness compared with placebo, with the biggest effect at the highest dose, while gut symptoms did not differ. Ten people, one acute exercise session, and the results were reported as likelihoods rather than conventional significance testing, so this supports the exercise-permeability point narrowly and does not establish a general gut benefit.
  11. Gutiérrez C, Villa S, Mota FR, et al. Does an L-glutamine-containing, glucose-free, oral rehydration solution reduce stool output and time to rehydrate in children with acute diarrhoea? A double-blind randomized clinical trial. J Health Popul Nutr. 2007;25(3):278-84..PubMedUsed to support: Double-blind trial in 147 children aged 1 to 60 months with acute non-cholera diarrhea and mild to moderate dehydration: a glutamine-based, glucose-free oral rehydration solution was no better than standard WHO oral rehydration solution for stool output in the first four hours, time to successful rehydration, or the volume of solution needed, and this held regardless of rotavirus infection. This null head-to-head result in people, rather than the animal absorption work, is the reason hydration is no longer listed as a use for glutamine.
  12. Millard-Stafford M, Snow TK, Jones ML, et al. The Beverage Hydration Index: Influence of Electrolytes, Carbohydrate and Protein. Nutrients. 2021;13(9)..PubMedUsed to support: Randomized crossover in 19 healthy adults comparing four drinks by beverage hydration index: a drink containing 2 g per litre of an alanyl-glutamine dipeptide plus electrolytes retained fluid better than plain water, but no better than electrolytes alone or a carbohydrate-electrolyte drink, and the authors concluded electrolytes made the largest contribution. Tested at rest, at a very small dose, using a dipeptide rather than free L-glutamine, so it does not show a hydration benefit attributable to glutamine itself.
  13. Lima AA, Carvalho GH, Figueiredo AA, et al. Effects of an alanyl-glutamine-based oral rehydration and nutrition therapy solution on electrolyte and water absorption in a rat model of secretory diarrhea induced by cholera toxin. Nutrition. 2002;18(6):458-62..PubMedUsed to support: Rat model of cholera-toxin-induced secretory diarrhea: rehydration and nutrition solutions based on the alanyl-glutamine dipeptide and on free glutamine both reversed the toxin's sodium secretory effect and cut net water secretion, the dipeptide more strongly than free glutamine. This is the animal work behind the sodium cotransport idea described in the mechanism section. It is rats rather than people, and it measures fluid movement across a perfused stretch of gut rather than whether a person stays hydrated, so it explains a plausible mechanism and does not demonstrate a hydration benefit.
  14. Tang G, Huang W, Zhang L, et al. Role of Glutamine in the Management of Oral Mucositis in Patients with Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Nutr Cancer. 2022;74(2):482-495..PubMedUsed to support: Meta-analysis of 15 randomized trials in 988 cancer patients found glutamine did not reduce how often oral mucositis occurred but did reduce its severity and the number of severe cases, along with opioid use, feeding tube use and mucositis-related hospitalization. This is supportive care delivered under medical supervision during cancer treatment, not a general consumer use, and the included trials vary in how glutamine was delivered, some of it as a mouth rinse or swish-and-swallow suspension rather than a swallowed drink.
  15. Shuai T, Tian X, Xu LL, et al. Oral Glutamine May Have No Clinical Benefits to Prevent Radiation-Induced Oral Mucositis in Adult Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Front Nutr. 2020;7:49..PubMedUsed to support: Meta-analysis of 6 randomized trials in 441 adults with head and neck cancer found oral glutamine did not significantly reduce the occurrence of radiation-induced mouth sores or prevent moderate to severe cases, though it may modestly reduce opioid use. Included as the counterweight to the more favorable mucositis analysis, so the page reports the disagreement rather than only the positive result. The reviewers cautioned that even the opioid finding is marginal and that larger, more rigorous trials are needed.
  16. Cruzat V, Macedo Rogero M, Noel Keane K, et al. Glutamine: Metabolism and Immune Function, Supplementation and Clinical Translation. Nutrients. 2018;10(11)..PubMedUsed to support: Review of glutamine metabolism describing how immune cells consume glutamine at rates similar to or greater than glucose, how the gut, liver and skeletal muscle control its supply, and how demand can outstrip production during severe metabolic stress. Cited for the mechanism sections only. It is a narrative review of physiology, not evidence that supplementation produces a clinical benefit, and its authors note that optimal dosing and target blood levels remain unsettled.
  17. Moore SR, Quinn LA, Maier EA, et al. Intervention and Mechanisms of Alanyl-glutamine for Inflammation, Nutrition, and Enteropathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2020;71(3):393-400..PubMedUsed to support: Double-blind dose-response trial in 140 undernourished children aged 2 to 60 months in Fortaleza, Brazil: 10 days of oral alanyl-glutamine at 3, 6 or 12 g a day, against a glycine placebo, produced only a small change in urinary lactulose excretion and only at the highest dose, with no effect on gut inflammation markers, diarrhoeal illness or urine metabolic profiles, and only transient changes in growth. This is the population and the route in which the gut-barrier idea should look strongest, and the result was modest at a dose well above a normal supplement serving, which supports the page's caution about typical leaky gut doses. Two of the authors were co-inventors of a now expired patent on alanyl-glutamine as an oral rehydration and nutrition therapy, and about a quarter of the children dropped out before the end of follow-up.
  18. Coëffier M, Hecketsweiler B, Hecketsweiler P, et al. Effect of glutamine on water and sodium absorption in human jejunum at baseline and during PGE1-induced secretion. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005;98(6):2163-8..PubMedUsed to support: Perfusion study in six healthy adults in which test solutions were passed directly into the jejunum through a tube: glutamine roughly tripled water and sodium absorption compared with saline, absorbed water better than an equal concentration of glucose, and blunted or reversed an experimentally induced secretory state. This is the human evidence that the sodium cotransport mechanism described in the mechanism section is real, so the page does not have to rest that idea on animal work alone. It is six people, the solutions were delivered through a tube rather than swallowed, and it measures fluid movement across one stretch of gut rather than whether a person ends up better hydrated, which is the outcome the human drinking trials failed to improve.