Lacidofil® (Lactobacillus rhamnosus R0011 and Lactobacillus helveticus R0052)

Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus R0011 + Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 (combined formulation)
Evidence Level
Limited
8 Clinical Trials
7 Documented Benefits
2/5 Evidence Score

Lacidofil® is a two-strain probiotic from Lallemand Health Solutions (formerly Institut Rosell), sold since 1995, that blends Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus R0011 and Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 at about 95 to 5. R0052 was first identified as L. acidophilus, so older papers use that name. In placebo-controlled trials of the blend, the main outcomes were not met: in hospitalized adults taking antibiotics it did not lower the share who developed diarrhea, though more kept unchanged bowel habits, and in healthy adults on an antibiotic, stool consistency and frequency did not differ. Trials in young children with acute diarrhea, in flu vaccine response in older adults and in an aspirin gut barrier test found no benefit. A small trial in colorectal cancer survivors reported fewer bowel symptoms. Several trials were funded or coauthored by the maker.

Studied Dose 2 to 8 billion CFU a day, usually split into two doses: 2 billion CFU twice daily for 14 days in hospitalized adults, 8 billion CFU a day in healthy adults on antibiotics, and 4 billion CFU twice daily for 5 days in young children.
Active Compound Live Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus R0011 (Rosell-11) and Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 (Rosell-52, CNCM I-1722), blended about 95:5.

Benefits

Bowel symptoms and quality of life over 12 weeks

In a placebo-controlled trial with results for 60 adults who had been treated for colorectal cancer, Lacidofil twice daily for 12 weeks led to a larger drop in the share reporting bowel symptoms and larger gains in functional well-being and quality of life scores than placebo. It is one small trial, and the abstract does not give the dose in CFU.

Stool outcomes during antibiotic use in hospitalized adults

In 214 adult inpatients starting antibiotics, 4 billion CFU a day for 14 days did not lower the share who developed diarrhea, the main outcome (3.9% vs 7.2%). More people on the probiotic kept unchanged stool frequency and consistency (48.5% vs 31.5%), a result outside the main and secondary outcomes that was not significant among those who completed the study.

Stool patterns during an antibiotic course in healthy adults

In 160 healthy adults taking amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, 8 billion CFU a day for 2 weeks did not change stool consistency or frequency, the main outcomes, or symptom scores compared with placebo. An analysis added after the trial found diarrhea-like episodes lasted about a day less (2.7 vs 3.7 days). Two authors were from the maker.

Digestive comfort during a stomach antibiotic regimen

In 90 adults given 14-day triple drug therapy for H. pylori infection, 4 billion CFU twice daily during and after the drugs went with less bloating, diarrhea, nausea and bitter taste and lower digestive symptom scores than placebo. The maker funded it. This is drug co-treatment in an infected group, not a stand-alone effect.

Digestive recovery in young children

In 886 Canadian children aged 3 to 48 months seen in emergency departments for gastroenteritis, 4 billion CFU twice daily for 5 days did not reduce moderate-to-severe illness (26.1% vs 24.7%) or shorten diarrhea or vomiting. A 112-child Indonesian trial also found no shorter diarrhea, and a European pediatric expert group advises against this use.

Gut barrier after a high aspirin dose

In 29 healthy adults, at least 8 billion CFU a day for 3 weeks did not limit the rise in gastroduodenal permeability after a single 1950 mg aspirin dose, and digestive symptom scores did not differ from placebo. The maker funded the trial and supplied the capsules.

Vaccine antibody response in older adults

In 554 healthy adults aged 60 to 90, Lacidofil capsules twice daily for 6 months did not change antibody protection after a flu vaccine, and the rate of flu-like illness, the main outcome, did not differ between the probiotic and non-probiotic groups.

Mechanism of action

1

Adhesion to gut lining cells (lab work)

In cell studies summarized by a maker-coauthored review, both strains stuck to human intestinal cells, helped maintain the barrier between cells and blocked several disease-causing bacteria from attaching. These are laboratory findings; the 29-person aspirin trial found no protection of gut barrier function in people.

2

Inflammatory signals in cell studies

The same review reports that the strains lowered the inflammatory signals IL-1β, IL-8 and TNF-α in cell experiments. Such markers were not shown to change any digestive outcome in the human trials cited here.

3

A fixed two-strain blend

Lacidofil combines R0011 and R0052 at about 95 to 5, so most of each dose is R0011. The trials tested the blend, not either strain alone, so results cannot be credited to one strain. Cerebiome uses the same R0052 strain with a different partner and has its own evidence.

Clinical trials

1
Hospitalized Adults Taking Antibiotics, 14 Days
PubMed

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial; one Lacidofil cap (2 billion CFU) twice daily for 14 days, started within 48 hours of antibiotics (Song et al. 2010, J Korean Med Sci)

214 adult inpatients at 10 Korean hospitals receiving antibiotics for respiratory tract infections; 42 did not complete

The primary outcome did not differ: diarrhea developed in 3.9% on the probiotic and 7.2% on placebo (P=0.44). Unchanged stool frequency and consistency was more common on the probiotic (48.5% vs 31.5%, P=0.01) but not among completers (P=0.10). Funded by a Korean gastroenterology society; the authors reported no conflict with the Korean supplier.

2
Healthy Adults on a 1-Week Antibiotic Course
PubMed

10-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel trial; 8 billion CFU a day of R0052 with R0011 during 1 week of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and for 1 week after (Evans et al. 2016, Br J Nutr)

160 healthy adults (80 probiotic, 80 placebo)

Stool consistency and frequency, the primary outcomes, did not differ from placebo, nor did diarrhea-like stools, symptom scores, safety measures or adverse events. In a post hoc analysis, diarrhea-like episodes lasted 2.7 vs 3.7 days (P=0.037). Two of the five authors are from Lallemand Health Solutions.

3
Bowel Symptoms in Colorectal Cancer Survivors, 12 Weeks
PubMed

Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial; Lacidofil twice daily for 12 weeks, CFU not given in the abstract (Lee et al. 2014, Dig Liver Dis)

Colorectal cancer survivors in Korea; 60 analyzed (28 probiotic, 32 placebo)

Changes favored the probiotic over placebo for the share with bowel symptoms (P<0.05), functional well-being (P=0.04) and cancer-related quality of life scores (P=0.04). Within the probiotic group, irritable bowel symptoms fell from 67.9% to 45.7%. A small single trial; the abstract does not name a product funder.

4
Gut Permeability After an Aspirin Challenge
PubMed

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial; at least 4 billion CFU of R0011 with R0052 twice daily for 3 weeks, with 1950 mg aspirin after 2 weeks (Judkins et al. 2024, BMC Gastroenterol)

29 generally healthy adults (mean age 26) who completed both phases

Aspirin raised gastroduodenal permeability to the same degree on probiotic and placebo, and gastrointestinal function scores did not differ. Funded by Lallemand Health Solutions and the USDA; Lallemand supplied the products and two authors work for it.

5
Flu Vaccine Response in Older Adults, 6 Months
PubMed

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled factorial trial (NCT03695432); trivalent flu vaccine or placebo plus Lacidofil or placebo capsules for 6 months (twice daily per the trial registry), CFU not stated (Koesnoe et al. 2021, PLoS One)

554 healthy adults aged 60 to 90 in East Jakarta, Indonesia, in four groups of 136 to 141

The probiotic did not change seroprotection or seroconversion (p=1.000 and p=0.210), and influenza-like illness, the primary outcome, did not differ between probiotic and non-probiotic groups. The vaccine maker paid two authors and supplied the vaccines; the probiotic supplier is not named.

6
Young Children With Gastroenteritis, 886-Child Trial
PubMed

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (NCT01853124); R0011 with R0052 at 4 billion CFU twice daily for 5 days, registered as Lacidofil (Freedman et al. 2018, N Engl J Med)

886 children aged 3 to 48 months at six Canadian pediatric emergency departments

Moderate-to-severe gastroenteritis within 14 days: 26.1% on probiotic vs 24.7% on placebo (P=0.72). Diarrhea and vomiting duration, unscheduled visits and adverse events did not differ. A later pathogen analysis found no benefit by virus or bacteria type. Funded by CIHR and others; Institut Rosell Lallemand is a registered collaborator.

7
Indonesian Children With Acute Diarrhea, 7 Days
PubMed

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial; R0011 (1.9 billion CFU) and R0052 (0.1 billion CFU) daily for 7 days with oral rehydration and zinc (Hegar et al. 2015, Indian J Pediatr)

112 children aged 6 to 36 months with acute infectious diarrhea and moderate dehydration

Median diarrhea duration was 68.5 hours on the probiotic and 61.5 hours on placebo (P=0.596), and daily stool frequency did not differ (P=0.795). The abstract does not state funding.

8
Children Taking Omeprazole, 4 Weeks
PubMed

Double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial; R0011 (1.9 billion CFU) and R0052 (0.1 billion CFU) daily alongside omeprazole 20 mg a day (Hegar et al. 2013, J Pediatr (Rio J))

70 children (36 probiotic, 34 placebo)

Positive glucose breath tests for small bowel bacterial overgrowth were 33% on the probiotic and 26.5% on placebo (p=0.13), so the probiotic did not lower the risk. The abstract does not state funding.

Side effects and drug interactions

Common Potential side effects

In 214 hospitalized adults, mild abdominal discomfort was reported by 3 people on the probiotic and 1 on placebo, and a skin rash by 1 on the probiotic; no serious adverse events were linked to it.
In 886 young children, adverse events were similar on the probiotic and placebo (34.8% vs 38.7%), and in healthy adults on an antibiotic, adverse events and safety measures did not differ from placebo.
Serious adverse events from probiotics have been reported in severely ill or immunocompromised children, including those with central venous catheters; avoid live probiotics in these settings unless the medical team advises them.
Allergens: in one trial the maker noted the capsules may have contacted milk, soy and yeast during manufacturing; check the label if you have these allergies.
Pregnancy and breastfeeding: none of the trials cited here studied these groups; ask your doctor first.

Important Drug interactions

Antibiotics: Lacidofil was given alongside amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and other antibiotics in trials; ask your pharmacist how to time it around antibiotic doses.
Immunosuppressants and chemotherapy: people with weakened immune systems should take live probiotics only with medical advice.
H. pylori drug therapy: it was studied only as an add-on to prescribed triple therapy; it does not replace those drugs.
Acid-reducing medicines: children taking omeprazole used it for 4 weeks in one trial, with no difference in bacterial overgrowth breath tests.

Frequently asked questions about Lacidofil® (Lactobacillus rhamnosus R0011 and Lactobacillus helveticus R0052)

What is Lacidofil?

Lacidofil® is a two-strain probiotic from Lallemand Health Solutions (formerly Institut Rosell), sold since 1995. It blends Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus R0011 and Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 at about 95 to 5. Older papers call R0052 Lactobacillus acidophilus, its name before it was reclassified.

Does Lacidofil help digestion during antibiotic use?

The trials found little difference. In hospitalized adults and in healthy adults taking antibiotics, its main outcomes (rates of diarrhea, or stool consistency and frequency) did not differ from placebo. Some other results, such as more people keeping unchanged bowel habits, favored it. It is not a substitute for medical care.

How much Lacidofil was used in studies?

Trials used about 2 to 8 billion CFU a day, usually as one capsule or sachet twice daily, for 5 days to 6 months. For example, hospitalized adults took 2 billion CFU twice daily for 14 days, and young children took 4 billion CFU twice daily for 5 days. Follow the product label.

Is Lacidofil suitable for young children?

In the largest trial, 886 young children seen in emergency departments with stomach illness did no better on it than on placebo, and side effects were similar. A European pediatric expert group recommends against this strain pair for that use. Ask a pediatrician before giving any probiotic to an infant or young child.

Is Lacidofil the same as Cerebiome?

No. Both contain L. helveticus R0052 from Lallemand, but Cerebiome pairs it with Bifidobacterium longum R0175 and was studied for mood and stress, while Lacidofil pairs it with L. rhamnosus R0011 and was studied mainly for digestive outcomes. Results for one product do not carry over to the other.

What is Lacidofil used for?

Lacidofil is researched primarily for Gut Health. In a placebo-controlled trial with results for 60 adults who had been treated for colorectal cancer, Lacidofil twice daily for 12 weeks led to a larger drop in the share reporting bowel symptoms and larger gains in functional well-being and…

Is Lacidofil safe, and does it have side effects?

Side effects and cautions reported for Lacidofil include: In 214 hospitalized adults, mild abdominal discomfort was reported by 3 people on the probiotic and 1 on placebo, and a skin rash by 1 on the probiotic; no serious adverse events were linked to it. It may also interact with some medications. Lacidofil is not right for everyone, so check with a healthcare provider first if you are pregnant or breastfeeding, have a medical condition, or take prescription medication.

Does Lacidofil interact with any medications?

Possible interactions include: Antibiotics: Lacidofil was given alongside amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and other antibiotics in trials; ask your pharmacist how to time it around antibiotic doses. If you take prescription medication, check with a pharmacist or doctor before using it.

How strong is the scientific evidence for Lacidofil?

NutraSmarts rates the evidence for Lacidofil as Limited (2 out of 5). It is backed by 8 study summaries and 15 cited references summarized on this page. A higher rating reflects more, larger, and better-designed human studies.

References(15 citations)

Evidence ratings on NutraSmarts are based on the totality of human clinical research, with emphasis on randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews. The references below directly support claims made throughout this page.

  1. Song HJ, Kim JY, Jung SA, Kim SE, Park HS, Jeong Y, Hong SP, Cheon JH, Kim WH, Kim HJ, Ye BD, Yang SK, Kim SW, Shin SJ, Kim HS, Sung JK, Kim EY. Effect of probiotic Lactobacillus (Lacidofil® cap) for the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhea: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study. J Korean Med Sci. 2010;25(12):1784-91. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2010.25.12.1784.PubMedUsed to support: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at 10 Korean tertiary hospitals in 214 adult inpatients who had started antibiotics for a respiratory tract infection. One Lacidofil cap (L. rhamnosus R0011 and R0052, named L. acidophilus in the paper, 2 billion CFU) twice daily for 14 days did not lower the primary outcome, antibiotic-associated diarrhea (3.9% vs 7.2%, P=0.44). No change in bowel frequency or consistency was reported by 48.5% vs 31.5% (P=0.01); among completers this was 43.4% vs 30.3% (P=0.10). Mild abdominal discomfort in 3 vs 1 and a skin rash in 1 on the probiotic. Funded by the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases; the authors declared no conflict with Pharmbio Korea, the product's Korean supplier.
  2. Evans M, Salewski RP, Christman MC, Girard SA, Tompkins TA. Effectiveness of Lactobacillus helveticus and Lactobacillus rhamnosus for the management of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea in healthy adults: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Br J Nutr. 2016;116(1):94-103. doi: 10.1017/S0007114516001665.PubMedUsed to support: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 160 healthy adults given amoxicillin-clavulanic acid for 1 week plus 8 billion CFU a day of L. helveticus R0052 and L. rhamnosus R0011 or placebo, continued for 1 week after the antibiotic. The primary outcomes, stool consistency and frequency, did not differ, nor did diarrhea-like stools, GSRS symptom scores, safety measures or adverse events. A post hoc analysis found diarrhea-like episodes lasted 2.70 vs 3.71 days (P=0.037). Two of the five authors are from Lallemand Health Solutions.
  3. Lee JY, Chu SH, Jeon JY, Lee MK, Park JH, Lee DC, Lee JW, Kim NK. Effects of 12 weeks of probiotic supplementation on quality of life in colorectal cancer survivors: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Dig Liver Dis. 2014;46(12):1126-32. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2014.09.004.PubMedUsed to support: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of Lacidofil twice daily for 12 weeks in colorectal cancer survivors (data for 28 on probiotic and 32 on placebo). Between-group changes favored the probiotic for the proportion with bowel symptoms (P<0.05), functional well-being (P=0.04) and colorectal cancer-related quality of life (P=0.04); within the probiotic group, irritable bowel symptoms fell from 67.9% to 45.7%. The abstract does not give the CFU dose or the funder of the product.
  4. Judkins TC, Solch-Ottaiano RJ, Ceretto-Clark B, Nieves C Jr, Colee J, Wang Y, Tompkins TA, Caballero-Calero SE, Langkamp-Henken B. The effect of an acute aspirin challenge on intestinal permeability in healthy adults with and without prophylactic probiotic consumption: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. BMC Gastroenterol. 2024;24(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-03102-w.PubMedUsed to support: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial in 29 healthy adults: a capsule of at least 4 billion CFU of L. rhamnosus R0011 and L. helveticus R0052 twice daily for 3 weeks, with a 1950 mg aspirin challenge after 2 weeks. Aspirin raised gastroduodenal permeability similarly on probiotic and placebo, and gastrointestinal function did not differ. Funded by Lallemand Health Solutions and the USDA; Lallemand supplied the products, and two authors work for the sponsor. The full text notes possible contact with milk, soy and yeast allergens in manufacturing.
  5. Koesnoe S, Masjkuri N, Adisasmita A, Djauzi S, Kartasasmita C, Sundoro J, Nadjib M, Korib M, Muthia AN, Muzellina VN, Habibah U, Nursyirwan SA, Djaya KH, Bachtiar NS, Sari RM. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of influenza vaccination and probiotic supplementation on immune response and incidence of influenza-like illness in an elderly population in Indonesia. PLoS One. 2021;16(12):e0250234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250234.PubMedUsed to support: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled factorial trial in 554 healthy adults aged 60 to 90 in East Jakarta: trivalent flu vaccine or placebo plus Lacidofil (L. rhamnosus R0011 and R0052, named L. acidophilus) or placebo capsules for 6 months. The vaccine raised seroprotection and seroconversion; the probiotic did not change antibody titers (p=1.000 and p=0.210), and influenza-like illness incidence, the primary outcome, did not differ by probiotic group. The vaccine maker paid two authors and supplied the vaccines; the paper does not name the probiotic's supplier or CFU dose.
  6. Freedman SB, Williamson-Urquhart S, Farion KJ, Gouin S, Willan AR, Poonai N, Hurley K, Sherman PM, Finkelstein Y, Lee BE, Pang XL, Chui L, Schnadower D, Xie J, Gorelick M, Schuh S, PERC PROGUT Trial Group. Multicenter Trial of a Combination Probiotic for Children with Gastroenteritis. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(21):2015-2026. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1802597.PubMedUsed to support: Randomized, double-blind trial at six Canadian pediatric emergency departments in 886 children aged 3 to 48 months with gastroenteritis: L. rhamnosus R0011 and L. helveticus R0052, 4 billion CFU twice daily for 5 days, did not reduce moderate-to-severe gastroenteritis within 14 days (26.1% vs 24.7%, P=0.72). Diarrhea duration (52.5 vs 55.5 hours), vomiting duration, unscheduled visits and adverse events (34.8% vs 38.7%) did not differ. Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others.
  7. Freedman SB, Finkelstein Y, Pang XL, Chui L, Tarr PI, VanBuren JM, Olsen C, Lee BE, Hall-Moore CA, Sapien R, O'Connell K, Levine AC, Poonai N, Roskind C, Schuh S, Rogers A, Bhatt S, Gouin S, Mahajan P, Vance C, Hurley K, Powell EC, Farion KJ, Schnadower D. Pathogen-Specific Effects of Probiotics in Children With Acute Gastroenteritis Seeking Emergency Care: A Randomized Trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2022;75(1):55-64. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab876.PubMedUsed to support: Patient-level analysis of the Canadian R0011 plus R0052 trial and a US L. rhamnosus GG trial (1565 children with a stool pathogen test). Neither product reduced moderate-to-severe disease for adenovirus, norovirus, rotavirus or bacterial infections, and diarrhea duration did not differ. Among adenovirus-infected children, the R0011 plus R0052 product was linked to fewer diarrheal episodes (aRR 0.65), a subgroup finding. The authors concluded the evidence does not support pathogen-specific benefits.
  8. Hegar B, Waspada IM, Gunardi H, Vandenplas Y. A double blind randomized trial showing probiotics to be ineffective in acute diarrhea in Indonesian children. Indian J Pediatr. 2015;82(5):410-4. doi: 10.1007/s12098-014-1408-5.PubMedUsed to support: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 112 Indonesian children aged 6 to 36 months with acute infectious diarrhea and moderate dehydration, all given oral rehydration and zinc. L. rhamnosus R0011 (1.9 billion CFU) and R0052 (0.1 billion CFU, named L. acidophilus) daily for 7 days did not shorten diarrhea (median 68.5 vs 61.5 hours, P=0.596) or reduce stool frequency. The abstract does not state funding.
  9. Hegar B, Hutapea EI, Advani N, Vandenplas Y. A double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial on probiotics in small bowel bacterial overgrowth in children treated with omeprazole. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2013;89(4):381-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2012.12.005.PubMedUsed to support: Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 70 children taking omeprazole 20 mg a day for 4 weeks: L. rhamnosus R0011 (1.9 billion CFU) and R0052 (0.1 billion CFU, named L. acidophilus) daily did not lower the rate of positive glucose breath tests for small bowel bacterial overgrowth (33% vs 26.5%, p=0.13). The abstract does not state funding.
  10. Kiattiweerasak A, Aumpan N, Chonprasertsuk S, Pornthisarn B, Siramolpiwat S, Bhanthumkomol P, Nunanan P, Issariyakulkarn N, Mahachai V, Yamaoka Y, Vilaichone RK. Efficacy and safety of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus R0011 and Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 as an adjuvant for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Front Gastroenterol (Lausanne). 2023;2:1245993. doi: 10.3389/fgstr.2023.1245993.PubMedUsed to support: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 90 Thai adults with H. pylori gastritis given 14-day standard triple drug therapy, with Lacidofil STRONG capsules (4 billion CFU of L. rhamnosus R0011 and L. helveticus R0052) or placebo twice daily during therapy and for 4 more weeks. Eradication was 90.9% vs 75.0% per protocol (p=0.047) but 88.9% vs 73.3% by intention to treat (p=0.059). Bloating, diarrhea, nausea and bitter taste were less frequent and GSRS scores lower on the probiotic. Funded by Lallemand Health Solutions, which took part in parts of the design. A drug co-treatment study in an infected population, cited as context only.
  11. Szajewska H, Guarino A, Hojsak I, Indrio F, Kolacek S, Orel R, Salvatore S, Shamir R, van Goudoever JB, Vandenplas Y, Weizman Z, Zalewski BM, Working Group on Probiotics and Prebiotics of the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition. Use of Probiotics for the Management of Acute Gastroenteritis in Children: An Update. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2020;71(2):261-269. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002751.PubMedUsed to support: ESPGHAN working group update on probiotics for acute gastroenteritis in previously healthy children. It made a strong recommendation against L. helveticus R0052 and L. rhamnosus R0011 for this use (moderate certainty of evidence) and found no strain with two high-quality positive trials.
  12. Goldenberg JZ, Lytvyn L, Steurich J, Parkin P, Mahant S, Johnston BC. Probiotics for the prevention of pediatric antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(12):CD004827. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004827.pub4.PubMedUsed to support: Cochrane review of 23 trials in children taking antibiotics, pooled across probiotic strains. No serious adverse events attributable to probiotics were found in otherwise healthy children, but serious adverse events have been seen in severely debilitated or immunocompromised children, including those with central venous catheters, and the authors advise avoiding probiotics in such at-risk children. It did not test Lacidofil specifically.
  13. Foster LM, Tompkins TA, Dahl WJ. A comprehensive post-market review of studies on a probiotic product containing Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus R0011. Benef Microbes. 2011;2(4):319-34. doi: 10.3920/BM2011.0032.PubMedUsed to support: Post-market review co-written by a scientist at Institut Rosell, the maker: Lacidofil, a combination of L. helveticus R0052 and L. rhamnosus R0011, has been sold in Europe, Asia and North America since 1995. In cell work the strains adhered to human gut lining cells, helped maintain barrier function, blocked adhesion of several pathogens and lowered IL-1β, IL-8 and TNF-α. Its summary of clinical benefits predates the larger null trials and was co-written by the maker.
  14. Auclair-Ouellet N, Tremblay A, Kassem O, Caballero-Calero SE, Bronner S, Binda S. Probiotics as Adjuvants to Standard Helicobacter pylori Treatment: Evidence for the Use of Lacidofil(®), an Established Blend of Thoroughly Characterized Strains. Microorganisms. 2025;13(10):2223. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13102223.PubMedUsed to support: Review by Lallemand Health Solutions employees. States that Lacidofil, available since 1995, blends L. rhamnosus Rosell-11 and L. helveticus Rosell-52 at a 95:5 ratio; that R0052 (CNCM I-1722) was first identified as L. acidophilus and later reclassified as L. helveticus; that R0011 was named Lactobacillus rhamnosus before the 2020 genus reclassification; and that the product is approved as a medicinal product in some countries. It summarizes eight H. pylori add-on trials, many with small samples; only three described random assignment and two used a placebo.
  15. U.S. National Library of Medicine, ClinicalTrials.gov. Impact of Emergency Department Probiotic Treatment of Pediatric Gastroenteritis: Randomized Controlled Trial (PROGUT, NCT01853124), study record. ClinicalTrials.gov. 2026;Registry record NCT01853124, accessed 2026..SourceUsed to support: Trial registry record, not PubMed-indexed, read in 2026. It names the study product Lacidofil: one sachet twice daily for 5 days, each with at least 4 billion CFU of L. rhamnosus Rosell-11 (95%) and L. helveticus Rosell-52 (5%), against a maltodextrin placebo. It lists Institut Rosell Lallemand as an industry collaborator alongside the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.