Insect Protein (Cricket / Mealworm)

Acheta domesticus (house cricket), Tenebrio molitor (yellow mealworm), Alphitobius diaperinus (lesser mealworm)
Evidence Level
Limited
5 Clinical Trials
4 Documented Benefits
2/5 Evidence Score

Insect protein comes from farmed insects such as house crickets and lesser or yellow mealworms, sold as whole-insect flour or as purified protein. Insects are protein-rich with a favourable amino acid profile, and in a tracer study 30 g of lesser mealworm protein raised muscle protein synthesis after exercise to a level not significantly different from milk protein. Training results are mixed: an 8-week study in young men found no added gains over carbohydrate, while a small 12-week study in older women found gains in muscle mass when cricket protein was combined with exercise. Crickets contain about as much iron as meat, but very little of it is absorbed. Insect farming is often promoted as better for the environment, though a recent critical review concluded many of those claims rest on small-scale studies. People allergic to shellfish, crustaceans or dust mites can react to insect protein and should avoid it.

Studied Dose 30 g of lesser mealworm protein after exercise (muscle protein synthesis study); 0.4 g per kg of mealworm protein after training and before sleep (8-week study); 30 g a day of hydrolyzed cricket protein (12-week study); 25 g a day of whole cricket powder (gut study).
Active Compound Insect protein from house cricket (Acheta domesticus), lesser mealworm (Alphitobius diaperinus) or yellow mealworm (Tenebrio molitor), as whole-insect flour or purified protein. Whole-insect flours also contain chitin, a fiber from the insect's outer shell.

Benefits

Muscle protein synthesis similar to milk protein

In a double-blind trial in 24 young men, 30 g of lesser mealworm protein after resistance exercise raised muscle protein synthesis at rest and after exercise. Rates were numerically lower than with 30 g of milk protein, but the difference was not significant. A cricket, pea and whey study in 50 men found similar activation of muscle-building signals despite lower blood amino acids.

Muscle mass and strength with training

In an 8-week trial in 18 young men already eating plenty of protein, mealworm protein gave no extra gains in lean mass or strength over carbohydrate. In a 12-week trial in 39 older women, 30 g a day of cricket protein increased fat-free mass, and strength gains were clearest when combined with exercise training.

Environmental footprint

Insects are often promoted as a lower-impact protein, and a review of insect muscle studies repeated that view. A critical review found most environmental studies were small-scale, that the impact of large-scale farming is unknown, and that insect foods tend to replace plant foods rather than meat.

Protein-rich, with iron that is poorly absorbed

Insects are high in protein with a favourable amino acid profile, and crickets contain about as much iron as meat. But in a study in 20 young women with low iron stores, only about 3 percent of cricket iron was absorbed, compared with about 14 percent from an iron salt, so insects are not a reliable way to raise iron.

Mechanism of action

1

Amino acids for muscle building

Like other high-quality proteins, insect protein delivers essential amino acids that switch on mTORC1 signalling, the pathway that starts muscle protein synthesis. Peak blood amino acid levels are lower than with whey or milk, but in the studies cited here the muscle response was similar.

2

Chitin fiber and gut bacteria

Whole-insect flours contain chitin, a fiber people cannot digest themselves. In a crossover study in 20 healthy adults, 25 g a day of whole cricket powder for 14 days increased the gut bacterium Bifidobacterium animalis 5.7-fold and was well tolerated. Purified protein isolates contain less chitin.

3

Why cricket iron is poorly absorbed

Laboratory digestion tests showed that chitin, chitosan and calcium in cricket biomass limit how much iron is released, which fits the low iron absorption seen in people.

Clinical trials

1
Lesser mealworm versus milk protein for muscle protein synthesis
PubMed

Double-blind, randomized controlled trial with stable isotope tracers after 30 g of intrinsically labeled protein (Hermans et al. 2021, Am J Clin Nutr)

24 healthy young men after one-legged resistance exercise.

Muscle protein synthesis rose with both proteins: at rest to 0.045 percent per hour on mealworm and 0.056 on milk, and after exercise to 0.059 and 0.073. Milk was numerically higher, but differences between groups were not significant. About 73 percent of mealworm and 77 percent of milk protein amino acids reached the blood within 5 hours.

2
Cricket, pea and whey protein after resistance exercise
PubMed

Randomized parallel controlled trial of a single protein dose after one-legged resistance exercise (Lanng et al. 2023, Eur J Nutr)

50 healthy young men.

Whey raised blood amino acids more than cricket or pea protein, but activation of the mTORC1 muscle-building pathway did not differ between the three proteins at rest or after exercise.

3
Insect protein versus carbohydrate during 8 weeks of training
PubMed

Randomized, single-blinded controlled trial of a lesser mealworm protein bar (0.4 g protein per kg) or a carbohydrate bar after training and before sleep (Vangsoe et al. 2018, Nutrients)

18 healthy young men training four days a week, 9 per group.

Both groups gained lean mass and strength, with no significant differences between them. The authors note both groups already ate a lot of protein.

4
Cricket protein and exercise in older women
PubMed

Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled 12-week trial with four groups: placebo, 30 g a day of hydrolyzed cricket protein, concurrent training with placebo, or training with cricket protein (Vaithanomsat et al. 2025, Food Sci Nutr)

39 community-dwelling older women.

Fat-free mass rose in the protein, training and combined groups, and leg lean mass rose in both protein groups. Strength gains were clearest with protein plus training. The groups were small.

5
Whole cricket powder and gut bacteria
PubMed

Double-blind, randomized crossover trial of breakfast foods with 25 g a day of whole cricket powder or control for 14 days (Stull et al. 2018, Sci Rep)

20 healthy adults.

Cricket powder was well tolerated, increased Bifidobacterium animalis 5.7-fold and was associated with lower blood TNF-alpha. Muscle outcomes were not measured.

Side effects and drug interactions

Common Potential side effects

Allergy: EFSA warns that people allergic to crustaceans, mites or molluscs may react to house cricket protein because of cross-reactivity, and that eating it may also cause new sensitization. Anyone with a shellfish, crustacean or dust mite allergy should avoid insect protein.
Allergens from the insects' feed may be present in the final product.
Product quality varies: in a 2026 review of one cricket powder, EFSA found microbial and contaminant problems and could not confirm its safety, so choose products with clear quality testing.
Whole cricket powder at 25 g a day for 2 weeks was well tolerated in healthy adults.

Important Drug interactions

No drug interactions are known.
Allergy is a food issue rather than a drug interaction: avoid insect protein if you have a shellfish, crustacean or dust mite allergy.

Frequently asked questions about Insect Protein (Cricket / Mealworm)

What is insect protein used for?

Insect protein, usually from crickets or mealworms, is used as a protein powder or food ingredient. It is high in protein with a favourable amino acid profile and is often chosen as an alternative to conventional animal protein.

Does insect protein build muscle like whey or milk protein?

In short-term studies after exercise, mealworm and cricket protein raised muscle-building signals and muscle protein synthesis to levels not significantly different from milk or whey, although blood amino acid levels were lower. Longer training studies are few and mixed.

How much insect protein should I take?

Studies used about 30 g of protein after exercise or 30 g a day. Use it like other protein powders toward your daily protein target, and follow the product label.

Is insect protein safe?

For most people it is well tolerated. People allergic to shellfish, crustaceans, molluscs or dust mites can react to it and should avoid it. Product quality varies, so choose products with clear quality testing.

What is Insect Protein?

Insect protein comes from farmed insects such as house crickets and lesser or yellow mealworms, sold as whole-insect flour or as purified protein. Insects are protein-rich with a favourable amino acid profile, and in a tracer study 30 g of lesser mealworm protein raised muscle protein synthesis after exercise to a leve…

Does Insect Protein interact with any medications?

Possible interactions include: No drug interactions are known. Allergy is a food issue rather than a drug interaction: avoid insect protein if you have a shellfish, crustacean or dust mite allergy. If you take prescription medication, check with a pharmacist or doctor before using it.

How strong is the scientific evidence for Insect Protein?

NutraSmarts rates the evidence for Insect Protein as Limited (2 out of 5). It is backed by 5 study summaries and 9 cited references summarized on this page. A higher rating reflects more, larger, and better-designed human studies.

References(9 citations)

Evidence ratings on NutraSmarts are based on the totality of human clinical research, with emphasis on randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews. The references below directly support claims made throughout this page.

  1. Hermans WJH, Senden JM, Churchward-Venne TA, Paulussen KJM, Fuchs CJ, Smeets JSJ, van Loon JJA, Verdijk LB, van Loon LJC. Insects are a viable protein source for human consumption: from insect protein digestion to postprandial muscle protein synthesis in vivo in humans: a double-blind randomized trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2021;114(3):934-944. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab115.PubMedUsed to support: Double-blind randomized trial in 24 healthy young men: 30 g of lesser mealworm or milk protein after unilateral resistance exercise raised muscle protein synthesis at rest (0.045 vs 0.056 percent per hour) and after exercise (0.059 vs 0.073), with no significant difference between proteins; 73 vs 77 percent of protein-derived phenylalanine appeared in the blood over 5 hours.
  2. Lanng SK, Oxfeldt M, Pedersen SS, Johansen FT, Risikesan J, Lejel T, Bertram HC, Hansen M. Influence of protein source (cricket, pea, whey) on amino acid bioavailability and activation of the mTORC1 signaling pathway after resistance exercise in healthy young males. Eur J Nutr. 2023;62(3):1295-1308. doi: 10.1007/s00394-022-03071-y.PubMedUsed to support: Randomized parallel trial in 50 healthy young men: whey produced higher blood amino acids than cricket or pea protein after resistance exercise, but mTORC1 pathway activation did not differ between the three proteins.
  3. Rutherford JAG, Elliott RM, Knott GP, Thatcher R, Manders RJF. Insect Protein to Support Human Skeletal Muscle Anabolism: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials. Nutr Rev. 2026;84(2):366-378. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuae218.PubMedUsed to support: Systematic review of 4 randomized trials (100 participants): insect protein gave lower peak blood amino acids than whey or milk in the two muscle studies, but muscle protein synthesis did not differ; the authors conclude insects can likely support muscle building like conventional animal protein.
  4. Vangsoe MT, Joergensen MS, Heckmann LL, Hansen M. Effects of Insect Protein Supplementation during Resistance Training on Changes in Muscle Mass and Strength in Young Men. Nutrients. 2018;10(3):335. doi: 10.3390/nu10030335.PubMedUsed to support: Randomized, single-blinded trial in 18 young men training 4 days a week for 8 weeks: 0.4 g per kg of lesser mealworm protein after training and before sleep gave no greater lean mass or strength gains than an isocaloric carbohydrate supplement; habitual protein intake was already high.
  5. Vaithanomsat P, Sukatta U, Janchai P, Tumnark P, Phoemsapthawee J. Enhancing Muscle Strength and Reducing Inflammation: The Combined Effects of Hydrolyzed House Cricket Protein Supplementation and Concurrent Training in Older Women. Food Sci Nutr. 2025;13(9):e70984. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.70984.PubMedUsed to support: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled 12-week trial in 39 older women: 30 g a day of hydrolyzed cricket protein increased fat-free mass and leg lean mass, and strength improved most with protein plus concurrent training.
  6. Stull VJ, Finer E, Bergmans RS, Febvre HP, Longhurst C, Manter DK, Patz JA, Weir TL. Impact of Edible Cricket Consumption on Gut Microbiota in Healthy Adults, a Double-blind, Randomized Crossover Trial. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):10762. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29032-2.PubMedUsed to support: Double-blind randomized crossover trial in 20 healthy adults: 25 g a day of whole cricket powder for 14 days was tolerable and non-toxic, increased Bifidobacterium animalis 5.7-fold and was associated with lower plasma TNF-alpha.
  7. Mwangi MN, Oonincx DGAB, Hummel M, Utami DA, Gunawan L, Veenenbos M, Zeder C, Cercamondi CI, Zimmermann MB, van Loon JJA, Dicke M, Melse-Boonstra A. Absorption of iron from edible house crickets: a randomized crossover stable-isotope study in humans. Am J Clin Nutr. 2022;116(4):1146-1156. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqac223.PubMedUsed to support: Randomized crossover stable-isotope study in 20 iron-depleted women: iron absorption from labeled house crickets with refined maize porridge was about 3 percent versus 14 percent from a reference iron salt; lab digestion showed chitin, chitosan and calcium limit iron release.
  8. Biteau C, Bry-Chevalier T, Crummett D, Loewy K, Ryba R, St Jules M. Have the environmental benefits of insect farming been overstated? A critical review. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2026;101(1):163-194. doi: 10.1111/brv.70076.PubMedUsed to support: Critical review: most environmental studies of insect farming are small-scale, the impact of large-scale production is unknown, and insect foods mostly replace plant products rather than meat.
  9. EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (NDA); Turck D, Bohn T, Cámara M, Castenmiller J, De Henauw S, Jos Á, Maciuk A, Mangelsdorf I, McNulty B, Naska A, Pentieva K, Siani A, Thies F, Aguilera-Gómez M, Frenzel T, McArdle HJ, Moldeus P, Neuhäuser-Berthold M, Schlatter JR, van Loveren H, Favata A, Rivero-Pino F, Ververis E, Hirsch-Ernst KI. Safety of Acheta domesticus (house cricket) spray-dried powder as a Novel food pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283. EFSA J. 2026;24(9):e9946. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2026.9946.PubMedUsed to support: EFSA scientific opinion on a house cricket powder: safety could not be established because of microbial and contaminant concerns; consumption may cause primary sensitization, and people allergic to crustaceans, mites and molluscs may react through cross-reactivity.