Sucrosomial® Iron

Evidence Level
Moderate
3 Clinical Trials
5 Documented Benefits
3/5 Evidence Score

Sucrosomial® Iron is ferric pyrophosphate wrapped in a phospholipid and sucrester coating, developed by the Italian company PharmaNutra. The coating is meant to protect the iron from stomach acid and let it cross the gut wall by a route other than the transporter that ferrous salts use; that route comes from cell, tissue and rodent studies and has not been traced in people. In adults with low iron, 30 to 60 mg a day raised haemoglobin to levels similar to intravenous iron by about 3 months, but refilled iron stores far less: in ulcerative colitis, ferritin rose a median 9 ng/mL against 137 ng/mL on intravenous iron. In one non-randomized comparison, 8.7 percent on sucrosomial iron reported side effects against 30.3 percent on an iron polymaltose product. Several studies had financial ties to the maker, and none of this applies when iron levels are already normal.

Studied Dose 30 mg elemental iron a day in most trials. Some started at 60 mg a day: for 8 weeks in ulcerative colitis, or for 10 days in moderate anaemia after childbirth, before dropping to 30 mg.
Active Compound Sucrosomial® Iron: ferric pyrophosphate microencapsulated in a phospholipid bilayer and sucrester matrix. Uptake through M-cells and macrophages has been proposed from cell, tissue and rodent studies and has not been confirmed in people.

Benefits

Oral iron that raises haemoglobin at 30 mg a day

In iron-deficient adults, 30 to 60 mg a day raised haemoglobin over 4 to 12 weeks. In head-to-head trials it did about as well as intravenous iron or other oral iron for haemoglobin, not better. In a 56-person comparison in inflammatory bowel disease, 8.7 percent on sucrosomial iron reported side effects against 30.3 percent on iron polymaltose, and 1 stopped against 4. That comparison was not randomized.

An oral option when the alternative is an infusion

In a randomized open-label trial in 99 adults with non-dialysis kidney disease and low iron, 30 mg a day reached the same haemoglobin at 3 months as 1000 mg of intravenous iron gluconate, with significantly fewer side effects. Intravenous iron worked faster, refilled stores better and held haemoglobin steady after treatment stopped, while on oral iron it fell back to baseline.

Tested in people who cannot tolerate iron salts

In 52 adults with inflammatory bowel disease who had not tolerated, or not responded to, iron salts, 30 mg a day for 12 weeks raised mean haemoglobin by about 0.5 g/dL; 5 stopped early because of side effects. In 30 adults with mild anaemia and the same bowel conditions, haemoglobin rose in 86 percent, though 9 still had digestive events. Neither study had a control group.

Tested in iron-deficient blood donors

Fifty regular whole-blood donors in Austria who had fallen below the haemoglobin cut-off for donating took 30 mg/day for 90 to 120 days. Among the 47 who finished, median haemoglobin rose 0.94 g/dL and median ferritin 4.97 ng/mL, standardised to 90 days of intake, with almost no digestive complaints. There was no control group, so part of that change may be recovery that would have happened anyway.

Tested in women after childbirth

Sixty women in Romania with mild or moderate anaemia after delivery took 30 mg a day (60 mg a day for the first 10 days if moderate) for 60 days; 57 finished. Haemoglobin rose 3.6 g/dL on average and 81 percent reached a normal level, but only 36 percent reached a ferritin of 30 ng/mL. There was no control group, and haemoglobin recovers on its own after childbirth.

Mechanism of action

1

M-cell and macrophage absorption pathway

The sucrosomial matrix is intended to protect ferric pyrophosphate from stomach acid and to avoid the DMT1 transporter, with iron proposed to enter through M-cells of Peyer's patches and gut-associated macrophages before reaching the circulation on transferrin. This route was mapped in cell-culture, ex vivo intestinal and rodent experiments, several of them run or funded by the manufacturer, and has not been confirmed in human absorption studies.

2

Reduced free luminal iron

Because iron is encapsulated rather than dissolved in the gut lumen, less free iron is available to interact with mucosa, microbiota, and dietary components. This is the proposed reason for the lower rates of digestive complaints reported in some trials.

Clinical trials

1
Sucrosomial Iron in IBD with Iron-Deficiency Anemia
PubMed

Pilot study of oral sucrosomial iron (30 mg elemental iron/day) for 12 weeks in adults with inflammatory bowel disease and mild iron-deficiency anemia. Endpoints: hemoglobin, ferritin, tolerability, and gastrointestinal adverse events. (Abbati et al. 2019, Internal and Emergency Medicine)

30 adults with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis and mild iron-deficiency anaemia; patients with severe IBD were excluded. 12 weeks, single arm, no control group.

Haemoglobin rose in 86 percent of participants (11.67 to 12.37 g/dL, p = 0.001) and all iron parameters improved. Forty-four adverse events were recorded in total, including 11 gastrointestinal events in 9 of the 30 participants (30 percent). IBD activity scores also improved, but with no comparison group that change cannot be separated from the natural course of mild disease.

2
Sucrosomial Iron in Oncology Anemia
PubMed

Pilot study comparing oral sucrosomial iron with intravenous iron in anemic cancer patients without iron deficiency who were receiving darbepoetin alfa during chemotherapy. Endpoints: hemoglobin response, transfusion need, safety, quality of life. (Mafodda et al. 2017, Supportive Care in Cancer)

64 adults with chemotherapy-related anaemia (haemoglobin 8 to 10 g/dL) and no absolute or functional iron deficiency, all receiving darbepoetin alfa. 8 weeks, randomized.

Haemoglobin response was 70 percent on oral sucrosomial iron and 71 percent on intravenous ferric gluconate, a difference that was not statistically significant. There was no difference in transfusion need and no difference in quality of life. The oral form was better tolerated. Every participant was also taking the prescription drug darbepoetin alfa and none of them was iron-deficient, so this trial says little about ordinary supplement use. The principal investigator reported honoraria and travel reimbursement from PharmaNutra.

3
Sucrosomial Iron in Ulcerative Colitis
PubMed

Randomized open-label trial of oral sucrosomial iron (60 mg/day for 8 weeks, then 30 mg/day for 4 weeks) against a single 1000 mg intravenous infusion of ferric carboxymaltose, in ulcerative colitis patients in remission with mild-to-moderate anaemia, all weighing under 70 kg. Endpoints: haemoglobin, serum iron, ferritin, gastrointestinal symptoms. (Bertani et al. 2021, Nutrients)

42 adults with ulcerative colitis in clinical, endoscopic and biochemical remission and mild-to-moderate iron-deficiency anaemia; 40 completed. 12 weeks.

42 patients were randomized and 40 analysed, 20 per arm. Haemoglobin rose about 1.1 g/dL in both arms by week 4 and stayed there, with no significant difference between them. Ferritin told a different story: at 12 weeks it stood at 26 ng/mL on sucrosomial iron against 131 ng/mL on intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (p = 0.001), a median change from baseline of 9 ng/mL against 137 ng/mL (p < 0.0001), so iron stores were not restored by the oral form. Tolerability was good on both, with one of the 20 oral patients reporting transient bloating and flatulence during the 60 mg phase. The trial was powered as a superiority comparison in 32 subjects with no pre-specified non-inferiority margin, so a non-significant result in 40 patients does not establish equivalence. PharmaNutra paid the article processing charge.

Side effects and drug interactions

Common Potential side effects

Mild digestive discomfort, nausea or constipation in a minority of users; in one 30-person study, 9 people reported digestive events.
Dark stools, which are expected with iron supplements.
Iron overload risk in people with hereditary haemochromatosis, untreated thalassaemia, or another iron-loading condition, in whom extra iron builds up.
Do not take iron unless a blood test has shown you are iron-deficient.
US iron supplements in tablet or capsule form must carry this warning: "Accidental overdose of iron-containing products is a leading cause of fatal poisoning in children under 6. Keep this product out of reach of children. In case of accidental overdose, call a doctor or poison control center immediately."
The Tolerable Upper Intake Level for adults is 45 mg/day of iron, and supplements providing 25 mg or more can reduce zinc absorption and plasma zinc concentrations.

Important Drug interactions

Levothyroxine: iron can reduce its absorption, and levothyroxine labels advise not taking it within 4 hours of iron.
Quinolone and tetracycline antibiotics: iron salts bind them and lower their absorption; follow the antibiotic label on spacing.
Proton pump inhibitors such as omeprazole: lower stomach acid and can reduce iron absorption. Whether sucrosomial iron is less affected has not been tested in people.
Methyldopa: iron salts sharply cut its absorption in a study of 12 volunteers and raised blood pressure in people taking it; separate doses.
Bisphosphonates such as alendronate: take them with plain water at least 30 minutes before any other food, drink or medicine, as their labels direct.
Levodopa and carbidopa: iron supplements may reduce how much levodopa the body absorbs and so its effect; ask a pharmacist how to space doses.
Mycophenolate mofetil: the evidence conflicts. In seven healthy volunteers iron cut its absorption by about 90 percent, but later controlled studies in healthy people and kidney transplant recipients found no interaction. Ask the prescriber about spacing.
Dolutegravir: take it 2 hours before or 6 hours after iron supplements, or take both together with food, as its label directs. Other HIV integrase inhibitors have their own label rules.

Frequently asked questions about Sucrosomial® Iron

What is Sucrosomial Iron?

Sucrosomial® Iron is ferric pyrophosphate wrapped in a phospholipid and sucrester coating, developed by the Italian company PharmaNutra. The coating is meant to protect the iron from stomach acid and let it cross the gut wall by a route other than the transporter that ferrous salts use; that route comes from cell, tiss…

What is Sucrosomial Iron used for?

Sucrosomial Iron is researched primarily for Women's Health. In iron-deficient adults, 30 to 60 mg a day raised haemoglobin over 4 to 12 weeks. In head-to-head trials it did about as well as intravenous iron or other oral iron for haemoglobin, not better.

What is the recommended dosage of Sucrosomial Iron?

The clinically studied dose is 30 mg elemental iron a day in most trials. Some started at 60 mg a day: for 8 weeks in ulcerative colitis, or for 10 days in moderate anaemia after childbirth, before dropping to 30 mg. Always follow the product label and check with a healthcare provider for personal advice.

Is Sucrosomial Iron safe, and does it have side effects?

For most healthy adults, Sucrosomial Iron is well tolerated at studied doses. Reported effects can include: Mild digestive discomfort, nausea or constipation in a minority of users; in one 30-person study, 9 people reported digestive events. Dark stools, which are expected with iron supplements. It may also interact with some medications. Sucrosomial Iron is not right for everyone, so check with a healthcare provider first if you are pregnant or breastfeeding, have a medical condition, or take prescription medication.

Does Sucrosomial Iron interact with any medications?

Possible interactions include: Levothyroxine: iron can reduce its absorption, and levothyroxine labels advise not taking it within 4 hours of iron. Quinolone and tetracycline antibiotics: iron salts bind them and lower their absorption; follow the antibiotic label on spacing. If you take prescription medication, check with a pharmacist or doctor before using it.

How strong is the scientific evidence for Sucrosomial Iron?

NutraSmarts rates the evidence for Sucrosomial Iron as Moderate (3 out of 5). It is backed by 3 clinical trials and 16 cited references summarized on this page. A higher rating reflects more, larger, and better-designed human studies.

References(16 citations)

Evidence ratings on NutraSmarts are based on the totality of human clinical research, with emphasis on randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews. The references below directly support claims made throughout this page.

  1. Abbati G, Incerti F, Boarini C, Pileri F, Bocchi D, Ventura P, Buzzetti E, Pietrangelo A. Safety and efficacy of sucrosomial iron in inflammatory bowel disease patients with iron deficiency anemia. Intern Emerg Med. 2019;14(3):423-431. doi: 10.1007/s11739-018-1993-9.PubMedUsed to support: Single-arm pilot in 30 adults with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis and mild iron-deficiency anaemia, with severe disease excluded. Twelve weeks of 30 mg/day of sucrosomial iron raised haemoglobin in 86 percent of participants (11.67 to 12.37 g/dL, p = 0.001) and improved all iron parameters. Forty-four adverse events were recorded overall, including 11 gastrointestinal events in 9 of the 30 participants. IBD activity scores also improved, though there was no control group against which to judge that change.
  2. Mafodda A, Giuffrida D, Prestifilippo A, Azzarello D, Giannicola R, Mare M, Maisano R. Oral sucrosomial iron versus intravenous iron in anemic cancer patients without iron deficiency receiving darbepoetin alfa: a pilot study. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25(9):2779-2786. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3690-z.PubMedUsed to support: Randomized pilot in 64 adults with chemotherapy-related anaemia (haemoglobin 8 to 10 g/dL) and no absolute or functional iron deficiency, all receiving darbepoetin alfa. Haemoglobin response was 70 percent on 30 mg/day of oral sucrosomial iron and 71 percent on weekly intravenous ferric gluconate, a difference that was not statistically significant, with no difference in transfusion need and no difference in quality of life. The oral form was better tolerated. The principal investigator reported honoraria and travel reimbursement from PharmaNutra.
  3. Bertani L, Tricò D, Zanzi F, Baiano Svizzero G, Coppini F, de Bortoli N, Bellini M, Antonioli L, Blandizzi C, Marchi S. Oral Sucrosomial Iron Is as Effective as Intravenous Ferric Carboxy-Maltose in Treating Anemia in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis. Nutrients. 2021;13(2):608. doi: 10.3390/nu13020608.PubMedUsed to support: Randomized trial in 42 adults with ulcerative colitis in clinical, endoscopic and biochemical remission and mild-to-moderate iron-deficiency anaemia, all weighing under 70 kg, with 40 analysed. One arm took 60 mg/day of sucrosomial iron for 8 weeks then 30 mg/day for 4 weeks; the other received a single 1000 mg infusion of ferric carboxymaltose. Haemoglobin rose about 1.1 g/dL in both arms by week 4 with no significant difference between them. Ferritin at 12 weeks was 26 ng/mL on sucrosomial iron against 131 ng/mL on ferric carboxymaltose (p = 0.001), a median change from baseline of 9 ng/mL against 137 ng/mL (p < 0.0001), so iron stores were not restored by the oral form. Both were well tolerated, with one of the 20 oral patients reporting transient bloating and flatulence during the 60 mg phase. The trial was powered as a superiority comparison in 32 subjects, not as a non-inferiority trial with a pre-specified margin. PharmaNutra paid the article processing charge.
  4. Riccio E, Sabbatini M, Capuano I, Pellegrino AM, Petruzzelli LA, Pisani A. Oral Sucrosomial® iron versus intravenous iron for recovering iron deficiency anaemia in ND-CKD patients: a cost- minimization analysis. BMC Nephrol. 2020;21(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12882-020-01716-w.PubMedUsed to support: Health-economic cost-minimization analysis, not a clinical trial. It re-analyses the same 99 non-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients from the randomized trial by Pisani and colleagues, costing oral sucrosomial iron at about 111 euro per patient-cycle against 1302 euro for intravenous iron gluconate from an Italian societal perspective, with most of the difference driven by patient and caregiver travel and time and by nursing minutes. No clinical outcome was measured in this paper, and no kidney or urinary-tract outcome was measured in either paper. One author reported symposium reimbursement and speaking fees from PharmaNutra S.p.A.
  5. Pisani A, Riccio E, Sabbatini M, Andreucci M, Del Rio A, Visciano B. Effect of oral liposomal iron versus intravenous iron for treatment of iron deficiency anaemia in CKD patients: a randomized trial. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015;30(4):645-52. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfu357.PubMedUsed to support: Randomized open-label trial in 99 adults with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease and iron-deficiency anaemia, comparing 30 mg/day oral sucrosomial (liposomal) iron with a total 1000 mg of intravenous iron gluconate given as 125 mg weekly over 3 months. Final haemoglobin was similar with either treatment, but intravenous iron raised it faster in the first month, replenished iron stores more, and kept haemoglobin stable after treatment ended, while haemoglobin returned to baseline in the oral group. Adverse events were significantly less frequent on the oral form.
  6. Antoine E, Mehedintu C, Mitran M, Diculescu D. Sucrosomial® iron effectiveness in recovering from mild and moderate iron-deficiency anemia in the postpartum period. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23(1):360. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05658-7.PubMedUsed to support: Open-label single-arm pilot in 60 women in Romania with mild or moderate postpartum iron-deficiency anaemia, 57 followed to the end. Women with mild anaemia took 30 mg/day for 60 days; those with moderate anaemia took 60 mg/day for 10 days then 30 mg/day for 50 days. At day 60 haemoglobin had risen 3.6 g/dL on average, 81 percent had corrected their anaemia, but only 36 percent reached a ferritin of 30 ng/mL and 54 percent a transferrin saturation of 20 percent. No participant stopped because of gastrointestinal side effects. There was no control group, and haemoglobin recovers spontaneously after delivery.
  7. Torreiter PP, Drexler-Helmberg C, Schimetta W, Krakowitzky P, Helmberg W, Schlenke P. Pilot Study to Gain First Indications for the Impact of a 3-Month's Oral Intake of a Sucrosomial Iron Supplement on Hemoglobin in Iron-Deficient Blood Donors. Transfus Med Hemother. 2023;50(4):286-293. doi: 10.1159/000527577.PubMedUsed to support: Single-cohort pilot in 50 regular whole-blood donors in Austria (premenopausal women, postmenopausal women and men) who had ferritin below 30 ng/mL and haemoglobin below the donation cut-off. They took 30 mg of sucrosomial iron for 90 to 120 days. Among the 47 who completed, median haemoglobin rose 0.94 g/dL and median ferritin 4.97 ng/mL when standardised to 90 days of intake, with improvement in every subgroup and almost no gastrointestinal side effects. The authors note the absence of a control group as a limitation and declare no conflicts of interest.
  8. Alexiadou S, Tsigalou C, Kourkouni E, Tsalkidis A, Mantadakis E. Oral Iron-Hydroxide Polymaltose Complex Versus Sucrosomial Iron for Children with Iron Deficiency with or without Anemia: A Clinical Trial with Emphasis on Intestinal Inflammation. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2024;16(1):e2024075. doi: 10.4084/MJHID.2024.075.PubMedUsed to support: Randomized trial in 56 patients aged 6 months to 16 years with iron deficiency with or without anaemia, comparing iron(III)-hydroxide polymaltose complex at 5 mg/kg/day with sucrosomial iron at 1.4 mg/kg/day over 90 days. Ferritin rose in both groups (6.6 to 12.1 mcg/L on sucrosomial iron, 6.7 to 15.9 mcg/L on polymaltose). Faecal calprotectin, the marker of intestinal inflammation, did not change significantly in either group, and there was no difference between the two formulations in calprotectin, ferritin or haemoglobin over time. The participants were children, a different population from an adult reader. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
  9. Guimarães A, Leal T, Carvalho T, Mendes S, Gonçalves A, Leal C, Santos A, Arroja B, Rebelo A, Damasceno E Costa J, Neves JC, Gonçalves B, Rodrigues Â, Vasconcelos H, Gonçalves R, Soares JB. Comparison of Two Oral Iron Formulations for Iron Deficiency and Iron Deficiency Anemia in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Prospective Study. GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2025;Online ahead of print, 19 Nov 2025. doi: 10.1159/000549682.PubMedUsed to support: Prospective two-centre cohort of 56 people with inflammatory bowel disease and iron deficiency, 23 given sucrosomial iron and 33 ferric hydroxide-polymaltose, with prescribing physicians preassigned rather than patients randomized. Only 9 of the 56 were actually anaemic; the other 47 had iron deficiency without anaemia. Efficacy was the same in both groups, and only 22 percent of participants met the efficacy endpoint at 12 weeks. Side effects were reported by 8.7 percent on sucrosomial iron against 30.3 percent on ferric hydroxide-polymaltose (p = 0.006), and 1 person on sucrosomial iron stopped treatment against 4 on the comparator.
  10. Bastida G, Herrera-de Guise C, Algaba A, Ber Nieto Y, Soares JM, Robles V, Bermejo F, Sáez-González E, Gomollón F, Nos P. Sucrosomial Iron Supplementation for the Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anemia in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients Refractory to Oral Iron Treatment. Nutrients. 2021;13(6):1770. doi: 10.3390/nu13061770.PubMedUsed to support: Prospective single-arm study in 52 people with inflammatory bowel disease and iron-deficiency anaemia who had not tolerated, or not responded to, oral iron salts. One 30 mg capsule a day for 12 weeks raised mean haemoglobin at every visit (about 0.5 g/dL overall) and quality-of-life scores improved; 5 patients stopped early because of side effects, and 96.9 percent of those who completed were adherent. There was no control group, and the writing of the paper was funded by Zambon.
  11. Morii M, Ueno K, Ogawa A, Kato R, Yoshimura H, Wada K, Hashimoto H, Takada M, Tanaka K, Nakatani T, Shibakawa M. Impairment of mycophenolate mofetil absorption by iron ion. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2000;68(6):613-6. doi: 10.1067/mcp.2000.111480.PubMedUsed to support: Randomized crossover study in healthy volunteers: taking an iron preparation with 1.0 g of mycophenolate mofetil sharply lowered blood levels of its active form, mycophenolic acid (12-hour exposure 2.92 vs 32.9 ug.h/mL).
  12. Mudge DW, Atcheson B, Taylor PJ, Sturtevant JM, Hawley CM, Campbell SB, Isbel NM, Nicol DL, Pillans PI, Johnson DW. The effect of oral iron admiinistration on mycophenolate mofetil absorption in renal transplant recipients: a randomized, controlled trial. Transplantation. 2004;77(2):206-9. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000100446.44001.00.PubMedUsed to support: Open-label randomized trial in 40 new kidney transplant recipients given iron with mycophenolate mofetil, iron 4 hours later, or no iron. Exposure to mycophenolic acid did not differ between groups (p = 0.82), nor did rejection or side effects. The paper notes an earlier study in seven healthy volunteers that found a 91 percent fall in absorption.
  13. NIH Office of Dietary Supplements. Iron: Fact Sheet for Health Professionals. National Institutes of Health. 2025;Online fact sheet, updated September 4, 2025..SourceUsed to support: Not PubMed-indexed (official NIH fact sheet). Gives the iron RDAs (8 mg a day for men and for women over 50, 18 mg for women 19 to 50, 27 mg in pregnancy) and the adult Tolerable Upper Intake Level of 45 mg a day; notes that supplements with 25 mg or more can reduce zinc absorption, that ferrous fumarate is 33 percent, ferrous sulfate 20 percent and ferrous gluconate 12 percent elemental iron, and that the WHO estimates about half of the 1.62 billion cases of anemia worldwide are due to iron deficiency. Lists interactions with levodopa, levothyroxine (labels advise a 4-hour gap) and proton pump inhibitors, advises taking calcium and iron supplements at different times, and quotes the required US warning that accidental iron overdose is a leading cause of fatal poisoning in children under 6.
  14. Ducray PS, Banken L, Gerber M, Boutouyrie B, Zandt H. Absence of an interaction between iron and mycophenolate mofetil absorption. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2006;62(4):492-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2005.02541.x.PubMedUsed to support: Open-label randomized crossover trial in 16 healthy fasting men. Mycophenolic acid exposure over 24 hours was similar whether mycophenolate mofetil was taken alone or together with an iron supplement (42.5 vs 44.7 ug.h/mL), so no interaction was found.
  15. Campbell N, Paddock V, Sundaram R. Alteration of methyldopa absorption, metabolism, and blood pressure control caused by ferrous sulfate and ferrous gluconate. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1988;43(4):381-6. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1988.47.PubMedUsed to support: Crossover study in 12 healthy people: ferrous sulfate taken with methyldopa cut the share of methyldopa absorbed from 29.1 to 7.9 percent, and ferrous gluconate had a similar effect. In 5 people on long-term methyldopa, 2 weeks of ferrous sulfate raised blood pressure in 4.
  16. Lehto P, Kivistö KT, Neuvonen PJ. The effect of ferrous sulphate on the absorption of norfloxacin, ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1994;37(1):82-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1994.tb04245.x.PubMedUsed to support: Three crossover studies in 8 healthy volunteers each. Ferrous sulphate (100 mg elemental iron) taken with the antibiotic cut absorption of norfloxacin by 73 percent, ciprofloxacin by 57 percent and ofloxacin by 25 percent.