Lysozyme (Salivary Antimicrobial Enzyme)

Lysozyme (muramidase) — salivary glycoside hydrolase EC 3.2.1.17
Evidence Level
Preliminary
3 Clinical Trials
7 Documented Benefits
1/5 Evidence Score

Salivary muramidase that hydrolyzes the N-acetylmuramic acid and N-acetylglucosamine peptidoglycan linkages of gram-positive bacterial cell walls. Studied mainly in oral-care formulations such as toothpastes and lozenges for plaque control, gingival inflammation, and extrinsic tooth-stain removal, often alongside lactoferrin and the lactoperoxidase system. Evidence is largely from small dental trials. Route caveat that matters on a site about things you swallow: almost all of that evidence comes from toothpaste, which is brushed on and spat out, so it does not tell you what a swallowed lysozyme capsule does. The largest trial of swallowed lysozyme, one year of 270 mg daily in 408 adults with chronic obstructive lung disease, did not reduce flare-ups compared with placebo. The swallowed trials that did show benefit combined lysozyme with lactoferrin in young children and measured gut outcomes. Nothing on this page measures hair, skin or nail outcomes.

Studied Dose Toothpaste twice daily or lozenge one tablet three times daily, both mouth-only routes spat out or dissolved; there is no established swallowed dose for lysozyme as a supplement.
Active Compound Lysozyme (muramidase), a glycoside hydrolase.

Benefits

Tooth surface stain removal toothpaste 8-week RCT

In adults with extrinsic tooth staining, lysozyme toothpaste was effective at removing extrinsic stains from the tooth surface versus control. That was a toothpaste trial, brushed on and spat out, so it says nothing about swallowing lysozyme, and a 2025 systematic review of enzyme and protein toothpastes reported that the hypothesised effect against extrinsic black stains was not substantiated in the three studies it was able to include.

Gingival inflammation reduction CELC RCT (KCT0001366)

In a multicenter randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial in chronic periodontitis, a vitamin C + E + lysozyme + carbazochrome combination (IGATAN F®) showed about 2.5x greater gingival-index improvement versus control (P=0.022). Several limits matter here. Lysozyme was one of four actives in the tablet, so its individual contribution cannot be separated out, and the participants were patients with diagnosed chronic periodontitis who had also received scaling and root planing, not general consumers. The placebo comparison ran for only the first 4 of the 8 weeks, after which both groups received the active tablet, and plaque index, probing depth, clinical attachment level and the patient-rated visual analogue score did not differ between groups.

Multi-enzyme lozenge plaque control 7-day RCT

In a small pilot in healthy adults, a multi-enzyme lozenge taken three times daily (including lysozyme) reduced new plaque build-up after one day, but that difference was gone by day 7 and the gingival index did not differ from placebo at any point. All 24 subjects completed with no adverse events. The trial was funded by the enzyme manufacturer, which has filed a patent relating to the work, and the published summary describes plaque-matrix degrading enzymes without naming lysozyme, so lysozyme's role in the lozenge is an assumption rather than something the trial measured.

Peptidoglycan hydrolysis mechanism

Lysozyme hydrolyzes the linkage between N-acetylmuramic acid + N-acetylglucosamine of peptidoglycan in cell wall of gram-positive bacteria — effectively limiting growth. This is a biochemical mechanism established in the laboratory, not a benefit measured in people. The same review notes that bacteria defend against it by producing lysozyme inhibitors or modifying their peptidoglycan, and that cell-killing activity against gram-negative bacteria has not been proved.

Toothpaste enzyme + protein synergy (13-week)

A toothpaste combining a three-enzyme system (amyloglucosidase + glucose oxidase + lactoperoxidase) with lysozyme and lactoferrin showed significant plaque and gingival benefit versus a commercial control, with plaque and gingival scores falling in the test group while rising in the control group. Nothing in this result is attributable to lysozyme on its own. The product was tested as a single finished toothpaste against a control toothpaste, so the result belongs to the whole five-component formulation, and neither trial summary isolates lysozyme or names it. Both trials of this toothpaste were run with authors employed by the manufacturer, so they are the same product tested twice for one sponsor rather than independent replication, and the route is brushing and spitting rather than swallowing.

In vivo salivary defense enhancement

mechanism — toothpaste containing enzymes + proteins enhances salivary defenses by increasing in vivo levels of antimicrobial compounds lysozyme + hydrogen peroxide. This is not well supported for lysozyme specifically. An in situ study that measured enzyme activity in the tooth pellicle after brushing with enzyme toothpastes found that peroxidase activity rose considerably and glucose oxidase rose sharply but briefly, whereas targeted accumulation of lysozyme was not pronounced, so the lysozyme half of this claim runs against the measurement.

Lysozyme + LPO synergy (Streptococcus mutans inhibition)

Lysozyme enhances the inhibitory effect of the peroxidase system on glucose metabolism of Streptococcus mutans. This comes from a 1992 test-tube experiment, not from people. In that work human milk lysozyme on its own slightly increased rather than decreased glucose uptake by Streptococcus mutans, only the combination with the peroxidase system shut glucose uptake down, and the viability of the bacteria was not affected by any of the treatments.

Mechanism of action

1

Peptidoglycan hydrolysis (gram-positive cell wall)

Hydrolyzes N-acetylmuramic acid + N-acetylglucosamine linkage of peptidoglycan — disrupts gram-positive bacterial cell wall integrity. Foundational antimicrobial mechanism.

2

Lysozyme + LPO antimicrobial synergy

Synergistic with lactoperoxidase against S. mutans. Mechanism: combined peptidoglycan plus hypothiocyanite attack on cariogenic bacteria.

3

Salivary defense system component

Natural human saliva contains lysozyme — endogenous antimicrobial defense. Products designed to top this up are applied inside the mouth as toothpastes, gels, rinses and chewing gums and are then spat out or swallowed only incidentally, and the clinical review behind this idea covers dry-mouth patients specifically. That is a mouth-surface route rather than a swallowed one.

4

Plaque-matrix degradation (non-biocidal)

Multi-enzyme lozenge mechanism — degrades plaque matrix without biocidal activity. This mechanism belongs to the lozenge as a whole rather than to lysozyme. Lysozyme cuts bacterial cell wall peptidoglycan, not the sugar polymers that make up the plaque matrix, and the lozenge trial summary does not name lysozyme among its enzymes. In that trial bacterial richness rose in both groups over the week, with the lozenge only slowing that rise in saliva, so preserving microbiome diversity is not what was shown.

5

Anti-inflammatory effects (gingival)

This is a proposed explanation rather than a measured one. The gingival-index improvement it refers to came from a four-ingredient tablet that also contained vitamin C, vitamin E and carbazochrome, and in that same trial plaque index did not differ from placebo, so the plaque-degradation half of the explanation was not borne out.

6

Tooth stain removal mechanism

Extrinsic stain removal, proposed to work through plaque and pellicle degradation and bacterial removal, although the mechanism has not been demonstrated directly and a 2025 systematic review of enzyme and protein toothpastes did not substantiate an effect against extrinsic black stains.

Clinical trials

1
Lysozyme Toothpaste 8-Week Stain Removal Clinical Trial

Randomized parallel-controlled double-blind clinical trial.

70 adults with extrinsic tooth staining. Lysozyme toothpaste vs control for 8 weeks.

The Lobene stain index was significantly lower in the lysozyme toothpaste group than in the control group at both 4 and 8 weeks, with no obvious side effects and 69 of the 70 participants completing. This is the one trial on this page that tested a product actually built around lysozyme, but it is a single small trial of a toothpaste that is brushed on and spat out, and a later systematic review of enzyme and protein toothpastes did not substantiate an effect against extrinsic black stains.

2
CELC Chronic Periodontitis Multicenter 8-Week Clinical Trial (KCT0001366)

Multicenter randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial (KCT0001366, retrospectively registered Jan 2015). Approved by IRB at Kyung Hee University Dental Hospital + Yonsei University Hospital + Dankook University Hospital.

Chronic periodontitis patients. Stratified block randomization. 100 patients randomised 1:1 to CELC (vitamin C plus vitamin E plus lysozyme plus carbazochrome, the Korean product IGATAN F from Myung-In, a fixed-dose tablet taken by mouth) or placebo for the first 4 weeks only, after which both groups received CELC for the remaining 4 weeks. All patients had also received scaling and root planing first. 93 completed. GEE model adjusted for age, gender, visits.

Test group showed 2.5× GI (Gingival Index) improvement vs control (P=0.022). Significant reduction in gingival inflammation. Other parameters similar between groups. Foundational chronic periodontitis evidence with fixed-dose combination including lysozyme.

3
Multi-Enzyme Lozenge Plaque Pilot (24-pt 7-Day Clinical Trial)

Randomized controlled pilot trial (ScienceDirect S0300571224002768 2024).

24 healthy adults randomized to Active (n=12) or Placebo (n=12). 1 lozenge TID for 7 days; no oral hygiene procedures allowed. TM-QHPI plaque index + Gingival Index + 16S rRNA gene sequencing of plaque + saliva at baseline + 7 days.

All 24 subjects completed study; NO adverse events. Plaque index was significantly lower in the active group after 1 day, but the groups no longer differed at 7 days, and the gingival index did not differ between groups. The study was funded by the enzyme manufacturer Novozymes, which has filed a related patent, and the published summary names plaque-matrix degrading enzymes without listing lysozyme, so this is weak and indirect support for lysozyme.

Side effects and drug interactions

Common Potential side effects

Generally well-tolerated; topical/oral application of natural enzyme.
Mild oral irritation (rare, transient).
Allergic reactions: supplemental lysozyme is often purified from hen egg white, so people with egg allergy should avoid it. A published case describes recurrent angioedema after swallowing a lysozyme-containing lozenge and after eating cured cheese and raw egg, in a patient whose blood test found IgE to lysozyme but no IgE to egg white, egg yolk, ovalbumin or ovomucoid, and who tolerated cheeses made without lysozyme. A standard egg-protein blood panel can therefore miss a lysozyme allergy.
Pregnancy/lactation: toothpaste application generally considered safe; tablet form limited specific data.
Long-term safety: the supportive multi-week trials used toothpaste or in-mouth lozenges rather than swallowed capsules. The longest trial of swallowed lysozyme gave 270 mg daily for a year to adults with chronic lung disease and did not meet its main endpoint; long-term safety data for swallowed lysozyme in healthy adults are lacking.
Bovine/egg-derived sources: caution for relevant allergies.

Important Drug interactions

Applied in the mouth as a toothpaste or lozenge, systemic absorption is minimal. Swallowed lysozyme is a protein and would be expected to be digested like other dietary proteins, but how much survives digestion and what it does once swallowed are not well characterised in healthy adults.
Most medications: no documented interactions.
Fluoride toothpaste: compatible — typically formulated together.
Mouthwash/oral antiseptics: avoid concurrent use within 30 minutes (potential enzyme inactivation).

Frequently asked questions about Lysozyme (Salivary Antimicrobial Enzyme)

What is lysozyme?

Lysozyme is a natural enzyme found in tears, saliva, and egg whites that breaks down bacterial cell walls, giving it antibacterial properties. It is used as a natural food preservative and in some immune- and throat-support products.

What is lysozyme used for?

Most of the human research is dental: toothpastes and in-mouth lozenges studied for plaque, gum inflammation and surface stain. It is also used to preserve foods such as some cheeses, and it occurs naturally in tears, saliva and egg white. For swallowed lysozyme the evidence is thin. The largest swallowed trial, a year of 270 mg daily in adults with chronic obstructive lung disease, did not reduce flare-ups compared with placebo, and the swallowed trials that did show benefit combined lysozyme with lactoferrin in young children and measured gut outcomes rather than immunity in healthy adults.

How much lysozyme should I take?

It is used in modest amounts in lozenges and supplements; follow the specific product's labeling. It is also consumed naturally in egg whites and dairy.

Is lysozyme safe?

It is generally safe and naturally present in the body and foods. Because supplemental lysozyme is often derived from egg white, people with egg allergies should avoid it.

What is the recommended dosage of Lysozyme?

The clinically studied dose is Toothpaste twice daily or lozenge one tablet three times daily, both mouth-only routes spat out or dissolved; there is no established swallowed dose for lysozyme as a supplement. Always follow the product label and check with a healthcare provider for personal advice.

Is Lysozyme safe, and does it have side effects?

For most healthy adults, Lysozyme is well tolerated at studied doses. Reported effects can include: Generally well-tolerated; topical/oral application of natural enzyme. Mild oral irritation (rare, transient). It may also interact with some medications. Lysozyme is not right for everyone, so check with a healthcare provider first if you are pregnant or breastfeeding, have a medical condition, or take prescription medication.

Does Lysozyme interact with any medications?

Possible interactions include: Applied in the mouth as a toothpaste or lozenge, systemic absorption is minimal. Swallowed lysozyme is a protein and would be expected to be digested like other dietary proteins, but how much survives digestion and what it does once swallowed are not well characterised in healthy… If you take prescription medication, check with a pharmacist or doctor before using it.

How strong is the scientific evidence for Lysozyme?

NutraSmarts rates the evidence for Lysozyme as Preliminary (1 out of 5). It is backed by 3 clinical trials and 14 cited references summarized on this page. A higher rating reflects more, larger, and better-designed human studies.

References(14 citations)

Evidence ratings on NutraSmarts are based on the totality of human clinical research, with emphasis on randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews. The references below directly support claims made throughout this page.

  1. Hu X, Zhang P, Zhang L, Matheson JR, Lin S, Sun JN, Delfanti C, Tian J, Gupta AK, Vasantharaghavan R, Huang R The effect of enzyme and protein containing toothpaste on gingival condition: a randomised controlled study BMC Oral Health. 2025;25(1):1727. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-07096-7.PubMedUsed to support: Double-blind randomised trial in 251 Chinese adults with gingivitis brushing twice daily for 26 weeks with either a fluoride toothpaste containing naturally occurring salivary enzymes and proteins or a control fluoride toothpaste, 198 of whom completed; gingival index and plaque index were significantly better in the test group at 4, 13 and 26 weeks. Limitations that matter on this page: this is a brush-on and spit-out toothpaste rather than anything swallowed, the product was tested as a whole formulation so no result can be attributed to lysozyme on its own, the trial summary does not name lysozyme, and six of the authors are employed by the manufacturer.
  2. Daly S, Seong J, Newcombe R, Davies M, Nicholson J, Edwards M, West N A randomised clinical trial to determine the effect of a toothpaste containing enzymes and proteins on gum health over 3 months J Dent. 2019;80(Suppl 1):S26-S32. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.12.002.PubMedUsed to support: Double-blind randomised home-use trial in which 229 adults completed 13 weeks of twice-daily brushing with a toothpaste containing enzymes and proteins mirroring those found in saliva, compared with a commercial fluoride control; plaque and gingival scores fell in the test group and rose in the control group, with no treatment-associated adverse events. The same limitations apply: a mouth-surface route rather than ingestion, a multi-component product in which lysozyme is one ingredient among five and is not named in the trial summary, and two of the authors employed by the manufacturer, with this trial and the 26-week Chinese trial testing the same product for the same sponsor rather than independently replicating one another.
  3. Tenovuo J Clinical applications of antimicrobial host proteins lactoperoxidase, lysozyme and lactoferrin in xerostomia: efficacy and safety Oral Dis. 2002;8(1):23-29. doi: 10.1034/j.1601-0825.2002.1o781.x.PubMedUsed to support: Narrative clinical review of lysozyme, lactoferrin and peroxidase used together in oral-care products for people with dry mouth, covering dentifrices, mouth-rinses, moisturising gels and chewing gums and evaluating how well that approach works and how safe it is. It is a review rather than a trial, the proteins are used in combination so none can be judged alone, the products are applied to mouth surfaces rather than swallowed, and the population is dry-mouth patients rather than general consumers.
  4. Gajda E, Bugla-Płoskońska G Lysozyme--occurrence in nature, biological properties and possible applications Postepy Hig Med Dosw (Online). 2014;68:1501-15. doi: 10.5604/17322693.1133100.PubMedUsed to support: Review of lysozyme biochemistry describing how the enzyme cuts the beta-1,4 bonds between N-acetylmuramic acid and N-acetylglucosamine in bacterial cell wall peptidoglycan, with bactericidal activity mainly against gram-positive organisms. The same review notes that cytolytic activity against gram-negative bacteria has not been proved and that bacteria defend themselves by producing lysozyme inhibitors or modifying their peptidoglycan. This is laboratory biochemistry in a Polish-language review with no human outcome data, so it explains a mechanism rather than demonstrating a benefit.
  5. Shao Y, Xue J, Peng C, et al. Clinical evaluation of a toothpaste containing lysozyme for removal of extrinsic stains on the tooth surface: An 8-week, double-blind, randomized study. Am J Dent. 2017;30(3):147-150..PubMedUsed to support: Randomised, double-blind, parallel-controlled trial in 70 adults with extrinsic tooth staining who used either a lysozyme toothpaste or a control toothpaste for 8 weeks; the Lobene stain index was significantly lower in the lysozyme group at both 4 and 8 weeks, 69 participants completed and no obvious side effects were seen. This is the trial the tooth-stain claim rests on. Limitations: a single small trial, and the route is a toothpaste that is brushed on and spat out, so it does not show what swallowing lysozyme does.
  6. Hong JY, Lee JS, Choi SH, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study for evaluating the effects of fixed-dose combinations of vitamin C, vitamin E, lysozyme, and carbazochrome on gingival inflammation in chronic periodontitis patients. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(1):40..PubMedUsed to support: Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre trial in 100 patients with chronic periodontitis who had first received scaling and root planing, taking a fixed-dose tablet of vitamin C, vitamin E, lysozyme and carbazochrome by mouth; the gingival index improved about 2.5 times more than control in the adjusted model, while plaque index, probing depth, clinical attachment level and the patient-rated score did not differ between groups, and 93 patients completed. Limitations: lysozyme is one of four actives so its own contribution cannot be separated out, the participants were periodontitis patients rather than general consumers, and the placebo comparison ran only for the first 4 of the 8 weeks before both groups were switched to the active tablet.
  7. Schlafer S, Johnsen KK, Kjærbølling I, et al. The efficacy and safety of an enzyme-containing lozenge for dental biofilm control-a randomized controlled pilot trial. J Dent. 2024;147:105107..PubMedUsed to support: Randomised, placebo-controlled pilot in 24 healthy adults taking one multi-enzyme lozenge three times daily for 7 days with no toothbrushing allowed; new plaque build-up was significantly lower in the active group after 1 day but the groups no longer differed at 7 days, and the gingival index did not differ between groups at any point. Limitations: 24 subjects over 7 days, funded by the enzyme manufacturer which has filed a related patent, and the published summary describes plaque-matrix degrading enzymes without naming lysozyme, so lysozyme's role in the product is assumed rather than measured.
  8. Cheng WD, Wold KJ, Bollinger LB, et al. Supplementation With Lactoferrin and Lysozyme Ameliorates Environmental Enteric Dysfunction: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019;114(4):671-678..PubMedUsed to support: Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Malawian children aged 12 to 23 months given 0.2 g of lysozyme plus 1.5 g of lactoferrin daily for 16 weeks, with 214 completing; the gut-permeability marker rose less in the supplemented group than in the control group over 8 weeks, but the difference was no longer significant at 16 weeks, linear growth was unchanged, and hospitalisation and acute malnutrition were less frequent with supplementation. This is one of the few trials of lysozyme actually swallowed, the route this site covers. Limitations: lysozyme was combined with lactoferrin so its own contribution is unknown, the participants were young children in a malnourished agrarian population rather than adults, the main outcome did not hold to the end of the trial, and what was measured was gut barrier function rather than anything to do with hair, skin or nails.
  9. Fukuchi Y, Tatsumi K, Inoue H, et al. Prevention of COPD exacerbation by lysozyme: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016;11:831-8..PubMedUsed to support: One-year randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 408 adults with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who swallowed 270 mg of lysozyme daily for 52 weeks on top of their usual therapy; the flare-up rate did not differ from placebo (1.4 versus 1.2, P=0.292), and lung function and symptom scores were not significantly different either, leading the authors to conclude the effect was insufficient. This is the largest and longest trial of swallowed lysozyme and it is a null result. Limitations: the participants were lung-disease patients rather than general consumers, four of the authors were employed by the pharmaceutical company that markets lysozyme in Japan, and the outcome has nothing to do with hair, skin or nails.
  10. Zavaleta N, Figueroa D, Rivera J, et al. Efficacy of rice-based oral rehydration solution containing recombinant human lactoferrin and lysozyme in Peruvian children with acute diarrhea. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2007;44(2):258-64..PubMedUsed to support: Randomised, double-blind controlled trial in 140 Peruvian children aged 5 to 33 months with acute diarrhoea, given a rice-based oral rehydration solution with or without added recombinant human lactoferrin and lysozyme; diarrhoea lasted 3.67 days with the added proteins versus 5.21 days in the control groups, and more children reached 48 hours with solid stool, while the volume of diarrhoea and the rate of a new episode did not differ. Limitations: lysozyme was given together with lactoferrin so its own contribution cannot be separated out, the participants were young children being treated for an acute illness rather than adults taking a daily supplement, and the outcome is gut related rather than anything to do with hair, skin or nails.
  11. D'Agostino S, Dolci M Exploring the Effect of Enzyme and Protein-Containing Toothpaste on Gum Health: A Systematic Review. Microorganisms. 2025;13(5)..PubMedUsed to support: Systematic review of enzyme and protein containing toothpastes, restricted to human studies published in the previous ten years, which found only three eligible studies and concluded that these toothpastes may improve gingival health after 12 weeks and 12 months, while the hypothesised effect against extrinsic black stains was not substantiated in those studies. It qualifies the tooth-stain claim rather than supporting it. Limitations: only three studies were eligible, they tested finished multi-component toothpastes rather than lysozyme on its own, and the route throughout is brushing rather than swallowing.
  12. Hannig C, Spitzmüller B, Lux HC, et al. Efficacy of enzymatic toothpastes for immobilisation of protective enzymes in the in situ pellicle. Arch Oral Biol. 2010;55(7):463-9..PubMedUsed to support: In situ study in 6 volunteers wearing enamel splints who brushed for 3 minutes with commercially available enzyme toothpastes, after which the tooth pellicle was assayed for enzyme activity before and 0, 20 and 40 minutes after brushing; peroxidase activity was enhanced considerably and glucose oxidase rose sharply but faded quickly, whereas targeted accumulation of lysozyme in the pellicle was not pronounced. It works against the idea that these products raise lysozyme levels in the mouth. Limitations: 6 subjects, bovine enamel slabs, a laboratory enzyme-activity readout rather than a clinical outcome, and again a brush-on route.
  13. Lenander-Lumikari M, Månsson-Rahemtulla B, Rahemtulla F Lysozyme enhances the inhibitory effects of the peroxidase system on glucose metabolism of Streptococcus mutans. J Dent Res. 1992;71(3):484-90..PubMedUsed to support: Laboratory experiment measuring radiolabelled glucose uptake by Streptococcus mutans exposed to human milk lysozyme, to the salivary peroxidase system, or to both in sequence; the combination completely inhibited glucose uptake, whereas lysozyme alone slightly increased it, and bacterial viability was not affected by any of the treatments. This is the source of the lysozyme plus lactoperoxidase synergy claim. Limitations: a test-tube study from 1992 with no people involved, no bacterial killing demonstrated, and lysozyme on its own was not inhibitory against this species, which cuts against using it as evidence for lysozyme as a standalone antibacterial.
  14. Pérez-Calderón R, Gonzalo-Garijo MA, Lamilla-Yerga A, et al. Recurrent angioedema due to lysozyme allergy. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2007;17(4):264-6..PubMedUsed to support: Case report of a 54-year-old woman who developed breathlessness and swelling of the eyelids, tongue and lips within minutes of taking a lozenge containing lysozyme, bacitracin and papain, having previously had three or four similar episodes after eating cured cheese or raw egg; blood IgE to lysozyme was present while blood IgE to egg white, egg yolk, ovalbumin and ovomucoid was not, and she later tolerated papain, bacitracin and cheeses made without lysozyme. It supports the egg-allergy warning in the safety list, and shows that a standard egg-protein blood panel can miss a lysozyme allergy. Limitations: a single case report, so it shows the reaction is possible rather than how often it occurs, and the lozenge contained two other ingredients, although both were tolerated on later testing.