Lactobacillus fermentum CECT5716 (Lc40 / Hereditum®)

Limosilactobacillus fermentum CECT5716 (formerly Lactobacillus fermentum CECT5716)
Evidence Level
Limited
3 Clinical Trials
5 Documented Benefits
2/5 Evidence Score

Lactobacillus fermentum CECT5716 (sold as Lc40 and Hereditum®) is a probiotic strain isolated from human breast milk. It has been studied mainly in breastfeeding women. In one trial in women with painful breastfeeding, 3 weeks of the strain lowered breast pain scores and milk Staphylococcus counts. In women treated for a breast infection, it was compared with antibiotics in a trial without a placebo group. A 16-week trial in 625 nursing women reported fewer cases of mastitis with the strain, but more than half of the women dropped out and no results were posted to the trial registry. In babies, a different population, formula with the strain was well tolerated and linked to fewer gut infections. Most trials involved the maker, and in 2017 the European Food Safety Authority found no established cause and effect relationship with a lower risk of infectious mastitis.

Studied Dose 3×10⁹ CFU/day for 16 weeks in the nursing-women trial; 3, 6 or 9×10⁹ CFU/day for 3 weeks in the breast pain trial; 10⁹ CFU/day for 3 weeks in the antibiotic-comparison trial.
Active Compound Limosilactobacillus (Lactobacillus) fermentum CECT5716; sold as Hereditum® and Lc40 by Biosearch Life.

Benefits

Breast pain scores in nursing women

In one maker-run, double-blind trial in women with painful breastfeeding, all three doses lowered breast pain scores versus placebo after 3 weeks, and Staphylococcus counts in breast milk fell from baseline while the placebo group stayed similar. The three doses worked alike, so no dose response was seen.

Breast health in nursing women

A maker-sponsored, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial randomized 625 nursing women to 3 billion CFU or placebo daily for 16 weeks. Among the 291 women who finished, there were 18 mastitis episodes on the strain versus 40 on placebo, but EFSA said no conclusions could be drawn because more than half of the women dropped out and the randomization and analysis had important flaws.

Breast milk bacteria in women under medical care

In a trial of 352 women with a breast infection during lactation, those taking the strain for 3 weeks had lower milk bacterial counts, improved more and had fewer recurrences than women given the antibiotics prescribed by their doctors. There was no placebo group, and the trial does not show that a supplement should replace medical treatment.

Infant formula with the strain from 1 to 6 months

In a double-blind trial of infant formula with this strain from 1 to 6 months of age, babies grew normally and had fewer gastrointestinal infections than babies on standard formula. That evidence is in formula-fed infants, a different population that does not transfer to an adult taking a capsule.

Tolerability in an infant formula trial

The strain was originally isolated from breast milk. In the infant formula safety trial, formula intake and tolerance symptoms did not differ from standard formula. In 2017 EFSA concluded that a cause and effect relationship between this strain and a lower risk of infectious mastitis had not been established.

Mechanism of action

1

Breast milk origin

The strain was isolated from human breast milk. Its origin is the proposed reason it might suit the mammary environment better than strains from the gut or vagina, but that idea has not been tested directly.

2

Lower Staphylococcus counts in breast milk

In the breast pain trial, Staphylococcus counts in milk fell from baseline in the probiotic groups, and in the antibiotic-comparison trial milk bacterial counts were lower with the strain. Staphylococci, streptococci and corynebacteria are the main bacteria behind lactational mastitis.

3

Lactic acid production

Like other lactobacilli, the strain makes lactic acid, which lowers local pH. This is a general proposed mechanism for lactobacilli rather than one measured in the cited trials.

4

Mammary microbiota balance

Researchers have described painful breastfeeding and mastitis as a mammary dysbiosis, in which potential pathogens increase at the expense of normal milk bacteria. Restoring that balance is the proposed broader mechanism.

Clinical trials

1
Nursing-Women Trial: Infant Outcomes in 291 Mother-Infant Pairs
PubMed

Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled multicentre trial: mothers took one capsule of 3×10⁹ CFU or maltodextrin placebo daily for 16 weeks. Registered as NCT02203877 by the maker, with mastitis incidence as the primary outcome; this report covers infant outcomes. (Pastor-Villaescusa et al. 2020, Benef Microbes)

291 mother-infant pairs who completed the trial (139 probiotic, 152 placebo), out of 625 women randomized.

Infants whose mothers took the strain had a lower incidence of conjunctivitis, and a protective link with respiratory infections depended on Staphylococcus levels in milk and infant stool. The mastitis results were published separately in 2017 and were not posted to the trial registry.

2
Dose-Ranging Trial in Women With Painful Breastfeeding
PubMed

Randomized double-blind controlled trial with four groups: 3×10⁹, 6×10⁹ or 9×10⁹ CFU/day, or maltodextrin placebo, for 3 weeks. Main outcome: Staphylococcus counts in breast milk. (Maldonado-Lobón et al. 2015, Breastfeed Med)

Lactating women with painful breastfeeding.

Staphylococcus counts fell from baseline in the probiotic groups while the placebo group stayed similar, and breast pain scores were lower in each probiotic group than placebo. The three doses had similar effects, so no dose response was seen. The trial was run by the strain's maker.

3
Lactobacilli Versus Antibiotics in Women With Lactational Mastitis
PubMed

Randomized trial with three groups: 10⁹ CFU/day of L. fermentum CECT5716, 10⁹ CFU/day of L. salivarius CECT5713, or antibiotics prescribed by primary care, for 3 weeks. No placebo group. (Arroyo et al. 2010, Clin Infect Dis)

352 women with infectious mastitis (124 in the L. fermentum group).

At day 21, milk bacterial counts were lower in the probiotic groups (2.61 and 2.33 log CFU/mL) than in the antibiotic group (3.28). Women in the probiotic groups improved more and had fewer recurrences than those given antibiotics.

Side effects and drug interactions

Common Potential side effects

Formula with the strain was well tolerated by infants in a 5-month trial, with formula intake and tolerance symptoms similar to standard formula.
Severely immunocompromised individuals: caution. Live Lactobacillus probiotics have rare case reports of bacteraemia in vulnerable patients, and this is a live organism that needs proper storage to stay viable.

Important Drug interactions

Antibiotics: take 2 to 3 hours apart from the probiotic dose.
This strain is not a treatment for mastitis. Anyone with a suspected breast infection should see a clinician rather than rely on a supplement.
Immunosuppressants: caution.

Frequently asked questions about Lactobacillus fermentum CECT5716 (Lc40 / Hereditum®)

What is Lactobacillus fermentum CECT5716?

It is a probiotic strain first isolated from human breast milk and sold by Biosearch Life as Lc40 and Hereditum. It is now classified as Limosilactobacillus fermentum. Most of its research is in breastfeeding women and in infant formula.

Does it help with breast pain while breastfeeding?

In one maker-run trial, 3 weeks of the strain lowered breast pain scores compared with placebo, and milk Staphylococcus counts fell from baseline. A larger maker-sponsored trial reported fewer cases of mastitis, but more than half of the women dropped out and EFSA found no established cause and effect. Breast pain, redness or fever while nursing should be checked by a clinician.

Is it safe?

In a 5-month trial in formula-fed infants, formula with the strain was well tolerated and growth was normal. As with any live probiotic, people who are severely immunocompromised should ask a doctor first.

What is Lactobacillus fermentum CECT5716 used for?

Lactobacillus fermentum CECT5716 is researched primarily for Women's Health. In one maker-run, double-blind trial in women with painful breastfeeding, all three doses lowered breast pain scores versus placebo after 3 weeks, and Staphylococcus counts in breast milk fell from baseline while the placebo group stayed si…

What is the recommended dosage of Lactobacillus fermentum CECT5716?

The clinically studied dose is 3×10⁹ CFU/day for 16 weeks in the nursing-women trial; 3, 6 or 9×10⁹ CFU/day for 3 weeks in the breast pain trial; 10⁹ CFU/day for 3 weeks in the antibiotic-comparison trial. Always follow the product label and check with a healthcare provider for personal advice.

Does Lactobacillus fermentum CECT5716 interact with any medications?

Possible interactions include: Antibiotics: take 2 to 3 hours apart from the probiotic dose. This strain is not a treatment for mastitis. Anyone with a suspected breast infection should see a clinician rather than rely on a supplement. If you take prescription medication, check with a pharmacist or doctor before using it.

How strong is the scientific evidence for Lactobacillus fermentum CECT5716?

NutraSmarts rates the evidence for Lactobacillus fermentum CECT5716 as Limited (2 out of 5). It is backed by 3 study summaries and 6 cited references summarized on this page. A higher rating reflects more, larger, and better-designed human studies.

References(6 citations)

Evidence ratings on NutraSmarts are based on the totality of human clinical research, with emphasis on randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews. The references below directly support claims made throughout this page.

  1. Arroyo R, Martín V, Maldonado A, Jiménez E, Fernández L, Rodríguez JM. Treatment of infectious mastitis during lactation: antibiotics versus oral administration of Lactobacilli isolated from breast milk. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50(12):1551-8. doi: 10.1086/652763.PubMedUsed to support: In 352 lactating women with infectious mastitis (L. fermentum group n=124), those taking 10⁹ CFU/day of L. fermentum CECT5716 for 3 weeks had lower milk bacterial counts, improved more and had fewer recurrences than women given antibiotics. There was no placebo group.
  2. Maldonado-Lobón JA, Díaz-López MA, Carputo R, Duarte P, Díaz-Ropero MP, Valero AD, Sañudo A, Sempere L, Ruiz-López MD, Bañuelos Ó, Fonollá J, Olivares Martín M. Lactobacillus fermentum CECT 5716 Reduces Staphylococcus Load in the Breastmilk of Lactating Mothers Suffering Breast Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Breastfeed Med. 2015;10(9):425-32. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2015.0070.PubMedUsed to support: In lactating women with painful breastfeeding, 3 weeks of L. fermentum CECT5716 at three doses lowered breast pain scores versus placebo, and Staphylococcus counts fell from baseline in the probiotic groups while the placebo group stayed similar. Run by the maker; no dose response across the three doses.
  3. Gil-Campos M, López MÁ, Rodriguez-Benítez MV, Romero J, Roncero I, Linares MD, Maldonado J, López-Huertas E, Berwind R, Ritzenthaler KL, Navas V, Sierra C, Sempere L, Geerlings A, Maldonado-Lobón JA, Valero AD, Lara-Villoslada F, Olivares M. Lactobacillus fermentum CECT 5716 is safe and well tolerated in infants of 1-6 months of age: a randomized controlled trial. Pharmacol Res. 2012;65(2):231-8. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2011.11.016.PubMedUsed to support: Infant formula containing L. fermentum CECT5716 given from 1 to 6 months of age was safe and well tolerated, with weight gain similar to control and a lower incidence of gastrointestinal infections. Evidence in formula-fed infants, a different population from adults taking a capsule.
  4. Pastor-Villaescusa B, Hurtado JA, Gil-Campos M, Uberos J, Maldonado-Lobón JA, Díaz-Ropero MP, Bañuelos O, Fonollá J, Olivares M, PROLAC Group. Effects of Lactobacillus fermentum CECT5716 Lc40 on infant growth and health: a randomised clinical trial in nursing women. Benef Microbes. 2020;11(3):235-244. doi: 10.3920/BM2019.0180.PubMedUsed to support: Report from the 16-week randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial in nursing women (291 mother-infant pairs; 3×10⁹ CFU/day): infant outcomes, including lower conjunctivitis incidence in infants of mothers taking the strain and a respiratory-infection link that depended on Staphylococcus levels. Several authors are from the maker, Biosearch Life.
  5. EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA), Turck D, Bresson JL, Burlingame B, Dean T, Fairweather-Tait S, Heinonen M, Hirsch-Ernst KI, Mangelsdorf I, McArdle HJ, Naska A, Neuhäuser-Berthold M, Nowicka G, Pentieva K, Sanz Y, Stern M, Tomé D, Van Loveren H, Vinceti M, Willatts P, Martin A, Strain JJ, Siani A. Lactobacillus fermentum CECT 5716 and a reduction of the Staphylococcus load in breast milk which reduces the risk of infectious mastitis: evaluation of a health claim pursuant to Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006. EFSA J. 2017;15(7):e04917. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4917.PubMedUsed to support: Not a trial. EFSA evaluated a disease risk reduction claim submitted by Biosearch Life. The one study in women free of mastitis at baseline was the 16-week trial of 625 nursing women, then unpublished: 291 completed it, with 18 mastitis episodes on the strain versus 40 on placebo, but EFSA said no conclusions could be drawn because more than half of the women dropped out, randomization was inappropriate and only completers were analyzed. The other two studies were in women who already had mastitis. EFSA concluded that a cause and effect relationship had not been established.
  6. Crepinsek MA, Taylor EA, Michener K, Stewart F. Interventions for preventing mastitis after childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;9(9):CD007239. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007239.pub4.PubMedUsed to support: Cochrane review of ways to prevent mastitis in breastfeeding women. Probiotics in general (not only this strain) may reduce the risk of mastitis compared with placebo (risk ratio 0.51; 2 trials; 399 women; low-certainty evidence). Results of the largest probiotic trial (639 women) were unavailable because of a contractual agreement between the probiotic supplier and the trialists, so the authors called the evidence incomplete, and they said conflicts of interest and industry funding may also have affected its certainty.