Benefits
Abdominal discomfort in adults with frequent bowel symptoms
In a first 8-week trial of 500 mg a day, 63% vs 47% of 179 adults with IBS analyzed were pain or discomfort responders (p = 0.04, though the printed 95% CI of 0.99 to 3.57 includes no effect). Independent reviewers noted this was not the main outcome, which was missed, and it was not significant when all 200 randomized were counted. A 12-week trial of 1,000 mg in 379 adults also missed its main outcome.
Abdominal pain and bloating with hard or infrequent stools
In 456 adults with IBS with constipation, 1,000 mg a day for 8 weeks did not change the main pain score versus placebo (p = 0.073); in an added analysis not among its prespecified endpoints, 45.1% vs 33.9% had at least a 30% drop in pain, and quality of life scored slightly higher. In a subgroup of the 379-person trial, the 180 people with constipation had less pain and bloating at 12 weeks.
Second-month bowel symptom scores in pooled trial data
A sponsor analysis pooling individual data from the first two trials (579 adults with IBS) found 12.3% lower abdominal pain and 9.2% lower bloating scores than placebo during the second month, but no difference at week 8 or over the full 8 weeks. Stools were softer in the constipation subgroup. Neither pooled trial met its main outcome, and the data came from Lesaffre.
Abdominal pain relief in independent pooled analyses of probiotic trials
An independent meta-analysis of 5 trials (1,482 adults with IBS) found fewer people with ongoing abdominal pain on this strain but rated the evidence low certainty, with very large differences between trials. A second found lower pain severity overall and with constipation, no effect on bloating, and included a trial where people also took standard IBS medicines.
Reaching the gut and the vaginal area after oral intake in healthy women
In 60 healthy women given 500 mg, 1,000 mg or placebo daily for 4 weeks, the strain was found in the stool of 90% of women taking it and in vaginal samples of 4 of 19 and 3 of 19. Vaginal Candida and lactobacilli did not differ between groups, and microbiome effects were small. Lesaffre funded and staffed the study.
Mechanism of action
Proposed fermentation and gut transit effects
Trial authors proposed that the yeast's sugar-splitting enzymes may help gut bacteria make short-chain fatty acids, which can speed small-bowel transit, and they cited a visceral pain-lowering effect in rodents. Transit was not measured in people, and stools were softer than on placebo only in constipation subgroups, not in the larger constipation trial.
Interference with E. coli toxins in simulated gut models (lab work)
In laboratory models of the human digestive tract, the strain did not change survival of an enterotoxigenic E. coli but lowered its toxin gene activity and toxin output, and 18 days of dosing raised Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus and short-chain fatty acids in a simulated colon. These are lab results, not human outcomes.
Action against Candida in mice (vaginal application)
In mice, live I-3856 placed directly in the vagina sped clearance of Candida albicans, clumped with the fungus, cut its attachment to cells and lowered its shift to the invasive hyphal form. Oral intake was not tested, and these are animal results funded by Lesaffre.
Clinical trials
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial; one 500 mg capsule of S. cerevisiae once daily for 8 weeks, then a 3-week washout, after a 2-week run-in; later papers identify the strain as CNCM I-3856. Two authors were from Lesaffre and one from Biofortis; no registry entry was found on ClinicalTrials.gov, and the full paper could not be read; a published comment by independent reviewers states the trial missed its primary outcome and that the responder analysis appears post hoc (Pineton de Chambrun et al. 2015, Dig Liver Dis)
Adults with IBS by Rome III criteria; 200 randomized (100 per arm) according to an independent comment and the sponsor's pooled analysis, with 179 analyzed (86 yeast, 93 placebo; 84% to 88% women).
Responders with improved abdominal pain or discomfort in the last 4 weeks: 63% vs 47% (54 of 86 vs 44 of 93; p = 0.04; odds ratio 1.88, printed 95% CI 0.99 to 3.57, which includes no effect). Independent reviewers report the primary outcome was not met and that, counting all 200 randomized and treating dropouts as nonresponders, the result was 54% vs 44% (p = 0.17). Bloating and bowel movement difficulty showed only nonsignificant trends, and stool frequency and consistency did not change. No constipation subgroup result is given in the abstract.
Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (NCT01613456; the registry lists change in discomfort score at week 8 as the primary outcome, while the paper uses a responder outcome over the last 8 of 12 weeks); two 500 mg capsules (8 billion CFU per gram) or calcium phosphate and maltodextrin placebo daily for 12 weeks. Run within a French public research program; the writing was funded by Lesaffre, three authors were Lesaffre employees, three worked for Biofortis, which Lesaffre funded, and the lead author consulted for Lesaffre (Spiller et al. 2016, United European Gastroenterol J)
379 adults with IBS by Rome III criteria recruited by French general practitioners (192 yeast, 187 placebo); 180 had IBS with constipation.
The primary outcome, a 50% drop in weekly pain or discomfort for at least 4 of the last 8 weeks, did not differ (32.2% vs 26.9%, p > 0.05), and no symptom or quality of life score differed overall. In the constipation subgroup, pain or discomfort (p = 0.03) and bloating (p = 0.03) were lower at 12 weeks, but responder rates were 22.0% vs 21.4%. The abstract calls the subgroup analyses planned while the results section heads them post hoc. Of 16 adverse events judged possibly related, 14 were digestive, reported as 10 on yeast and 4 on placebo.
Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (NCT03150212); two 500 mg capsules giving 8 billion CFU, or maize starch placebo, daily for 8 weeks after a 2-week run-in. Product supplied by Gnosis by Lesaffre; six authors were Lesaffre employees, one a former employee, and two received Lesaffre research funding (Mourey et al. 2022, World J Gastroenterol)
456 adults with IBS with constipation by Rome IV criteria and baseline pain of 2 to under 6 on a 7-point scale (230 yeast, 226 placebo; 86% women).
The primary outcome, abdominal pain area under the curve over weeks 5 to 8, did not differ (difference -0.59, 95% CI -1.23 to 0.05, p = 0.073). In an added responder analysis not listed among the paper's prespecified secondary endpoints, 45.1% vs 33.9% had at least a 30% drop in pain (p = 0.017); the IBS quality of life score, a secondary objective, was 3.86 points higher (p = 0.047). Bloating fell by similar amounts in both groups, and stool frequency and form did not differ between groups. Adverse events per person did not differ; serious events were 1 on yeast and 2 on placebo.
Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial; S. cerevisiae CNCM I-3856 at 2 billion CFU twice daily or placebo for 8 weeks, added to standard IBS treatment; two of five authors were from Tablets India Limited; the abstract gives no blinding, registry or funding details (Gayathri et al. 2020, Int J Colorectal Dis)
100 newly diagnosed adults with IBS in India, grouped by IBS subtype before randomization.
Abdominal pain scores fell more on the yeast than on placebo (p < 0.001), and stool consistency improved more in the diarrhea subtype (p < 0.001), with similar changes reported in the other subtypes. No serious adverse events. Because everyone was also on standard IBS medicines, this is drug co-treatment in a diagnosed population; context only.
Exploratory, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-arm trial (NCT03574844); 500 mg (2.5 billion CFU) or 1,000 mg (5 billion CFU) of the strain, or maize starch placebo, daily for 4 weeks. Lesaffre funded it, and all authors were Lesaffre employees; a second paper on the same trial analyzed vaginal microbiome sequencing (Decherf et al. 2020, Nutrients)
60 healthy women (20 per group); 57 completed. 52 women's samples were used in the microbiome paper.
The strain was found in vaginal samples of 4 of 19 women on 500 mg and 3 of 19 on 1,000 mg, and in stool of 90% of women taking it. Vaginal Candida albicans and lactobacilli did not differ between groups. In the microbiome paper, the yeast's effects were described as limited and were hard to separate from differences present at the start. No serious adverse events linked to the product or the research.