Bifidobacterium lactis Bl-04 (Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis Bl-04)

Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis
Evidence Level
Limited
7 Clinical Trials
6 Documented Benefits
2/5 Evidence Score

Bl-04 is a probiotic strain of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis, deposited as ATCC SD5219 and now made by IFF (formerly Danisco and DuPont). It is a different strain from BB-12 and HN019, and results for those strains do not carry over. In a 150-day trial in 465 healthy, physically active adults, 2 billion CFU a day lowered the risk of an upper respiratory illness episode compared with placebo. Two later trials that gave the same dose before a deliberate rhinovirus exposure did not lower infection, illness or symptoms; the first found changes in nasal immune signals and less virus shedding, which the larger second trial did not repeat. The strain's maker funded all three of these respiratory trials. A separate digestive trial of Bl-04 alone found no improvement over placebo. Bl-04 also appears in multi-strain blends, whose results are not results for Bl-04 itself.

Studied Dose Respiratory trials: 2 billion CFU a day as a powder sachet, for 150 days in active adults or 28 days before a rhinovirus challenge. Yogurt trial: over 2 billion CFU per 100 g in 250 g a day for 12 weeks. Digestive trial: 1 billion CFU a day for 4 weeks.
Active Compound Live Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis strain Bl-04 (ATCC SD5219).

Benefits

Immune support in physically active adults

In a 150-day placebo-controlled trial in 465 healthy, physically active adults, 2 billion CFU of Bl-04 a day lowered the risk of an upper respiratory illness episode (hazard ratio 0.73) and delayed the first episode by about 0.7 months. The maker funded the trial, and later rhinovirus challenge trials did not show fewer infections or illnesses.

Nasal immune activity during a rhinovirus challenge

In 152 adults given Bl-04 or placebo for 28 days before a deliberate rhinovirus exposure, Bl-04 raised the nasal immune signal CXCL8 before exposure, blunted its rise afterward, and fewer people shed virus (76% versus 91%). Infection rate and symptom scores did not differ, and a larger repeat trial found no difference in virus shedding.

Illness after a rhinovirus challenge in healthy adults

In a larger maker-funded trial, 334 healthy adults took Bl-04 or placebo for 28 days and were then exposed to a rhinovirus. Illness developed in 56% on Bl-04 and 50% on placebo, a difference that was not significant, and illness length, infection rate, virus levels and symptom scores were similar in both groups.

Immune support with a Bl-04 fermented milk

In a 12-week trial in 136 adults in a haze-affected area of northern China, a daily 250 g yogurt with Bl-04 was followed by fewer colds (24% versus 46%) and shorter, milder respiratory symptoms than a control yogurt. The test yogurt also held fruit jams the control lacked, and dairy company staff co-authored the study.

Antibody response to an oral vaccine (immune marker)

In a 3-week trial in 83 healthy adults comparing seven single strains with placebo at 20 billion CFU a day, the Bl-04 group had a larger rise in vaccine-specific blood IgG after an oral cholera vaccine than controls. Saliva IgA did not differ and overall vaccination was not affected. Each group was small, and this is a lab marker.

Digestive comfort in healthy adults

In a 4-week placebo-controlled trial in 68 healthy adults, 1 billion CFU of Bl-04 alone did not improve digestive symptom scores more than placebo; its gastric function scores improved only within its own group, and the authors called its effects minimal. A five-strain blend that included Bl-04 did not ease bloating or speed transit more than placebo in adults with constipation.

Mechanism of action

1

Nasal innate immune signals (human marker)

In a rhinovirus challenge trial, people taking Bl-04 had higher nasal levels of the immune signal CXCL8 before virus exposure and a smaller CXCL8 rise after it. This suggests an effect on resting innate immunity in the nose, but the change did not alter symptoms and was not tested again as a main outcome.

2

Antiviral signaling in immune cells (lab and animal work)

In maker-run lab work, Bl-04 mildly stimulated antiviral responses in human macrophages and dendritic cells but had little effect on rhinovirus growth in cultured cells. In mice exposed to influenza virus, Bl-04 lowered lung virus levels by 48% on day 3. These are not human results.

3

Genome built for the gut

A genome comparison found genes linked to using dietary carbohydrates, tolerating bile and acid, and interacting with the gut lining. Bl-04 differs from another strain of its subspecies mainly by 47 single-letter DNA changes and part of one CRISPR region, so standard lab methods cannot tell such strains apart and strain names on labels matter.

4

Passage through the gut during antibiotic use (blend data)

In a trial of a four-strain blend taken during antibiotic treatment, Bl-04 was found in the stool of more people than on placebo at the end of the course and a week later, and dropped back to baseline once intake stopped. Bl-04 was one of four strains given in equal amounts.

Clinical trials

1
Bl-04 and Upper Respiratory Illness in Physically Active Adults
PubMed

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled three-arm trial at the Australian Institute of Sport and Griffith University; Bl-04 2 billion CFU a day versus L. acidophilus NCFM plus B. lactis Bi-07 versus a sucrose placebo, stirred into a drink, over about 5 winter months (ACTRN12611000130965). The trial registry lists 20 billion CFU for this arm, while the published paper reports 2 billion. Funded by Danisco; one author worked for DuPont/Danisco (West et al. 2014, Clin Nutr)

465 healthy, physically active adults (241 men, 224 women; mean age about 35).

Bl-04 lowered the risk of an upper respiratory illness episode compared with placebo (hazard ratio 0.73, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.95, p=0.022) and delayed the median time to a first episode from 2.5 to 3.2 months. The two-strain blend did not differ significantly from placebo (hazard ratio 0.81). There were too few digestive illness episodes to analyze. Illness was self-reported in daily online logs.

2
Bl-04 Before a Rhinovirus Challenge: Nasal Immune Response
PubMed

Randomized, placebo-controlled trial (NCT01669603); Bl-04 at a minimum of 2 billion CFU a day in a sucrose sachet for 28 days before nasal exposure to rhinovirus A39 and 5 days after. Funded by Danisco Sweeteners Oy; two authors were employees of the sponsor (Turner et al. 2017, Benef Microbes)

152 seronegative healthy adults challenged (73 Bl-04, 79 placebo); 58 and 57 met criteria for analysis.

Primary outcome: the nasal CXCL8 response to infection was smaller with Bl-04 (p=0.03), and baseline nasal CXCL8 was higher (90 versus 58 pg/mL). Fewer Bl-04 users shed virus (76% versus 91%, p=0.04) and nasal virus titers were lower. Symptom scores, infection rate and lower airway inflammation did not differ.

3
Bl-04 and Rhinovirus Illness: Larger Phase II Challenge Trial
PubMed

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center phase II trial (NCT02679807); Bl-04 at a minimum of 2 billion CFU a day in a sucrose sachet for 28 days, then rhinovirus A39 challenge and 14 days of follow-up. Funded by Danisco Sweeteners Oy (now IFF); several authors worked for IFF (Turner et al. 2022, EClinicalMedicine)

334 healthy volunteers from a US university community randomized (165 Bl-04, 169 placebo); 232 in the per-protocol analysis.

Null primary result: rhinovirus-associated illness occurred in 56% on Bl-04 and 50% on placebo (p=0.34). Illness duration (median 11.0 versus 11.5 days), infection rate (86% versus 80%), the share shedding virus (78% versus 69%), nasal virus titers and daily symptom scores also did not differ. No adverse events were judged definitely or probably related to Bl-04.

4
Bl-04 Yogurt and Respiratory Infections in a Haze-Affected Area
PubMed

Randomized trial (ChiCTR1900027437); 250 g a day of a yogurt with over 2 billion CFU Bl-04 per 100 g plus loquat and snow pear jams, versus a control yogurt without Bl-04 or the jams, for 12 weeks. Products were made by Bright Dairy, and three authors worked for Bright Dairy; no conflict of interest was declared (Zhang et al. 2021, Pharm Biol)

136 adults aged 25 to 55 with frequent past colds living in northern China randomized; 123 analyzed (62 test, 61 control).

The Bl-04 yogurt group had fewer common colds (24.2% versus 45.9%, OR 0.38) and influenza-like illness (OR 0.32), and shorter, milder respiratory symptoms. Blood interferon-gamma and secretory IgA were higher. Because the jams differed between yogurts, the effect cannot be credited to Bl-04 alone.

5
Seven Single Strains and the Antibody Response to an Oral Vaccine
PubMed

Double-blind, randomized, controlled trial; one of seven single probiotic strains, including Bl-04, at 20 billion CFU a day, or maltodextrin, for 3 weeks, with an oral cholera vaccine on days 7 and 14. Funding and most author affiliations were not stated in the abstract (Paineau et al. 2008, FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol)

83 healthy adults aged 18 to 62 split across eight groups.

Vaccine-specific serum IgG rose more from day 0 to day 21 with Bl-04 (and with L. acidophilus La-14) than with control (p=0.01). Salivary IgA did not differ, and overall vaccination was not influenced. These are immune markers in small groups, not infection outcomes.

6
PHAGE-2: Bl-04 Alone or With Bacteriophages for Digestive Comfort
PubMed

Randomized, parallel-arm, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (NCT04511221); Bl-04 1 billion CFU a day, Bl-04 plus a bacteriophage product, or maltodextrin placebo for 4 weeks. Funded by Deerland Enzymes, maker of the phage product, which also supplied the strains (Grubb et al. 2020, Nutrients)

68 healthy adults enrolled; 66 completed.

No digestive symptom score differed between groups. Within groups, gastric function scores improved with Bl-04 alone and GI inflammation scores improved with Bl-04 plus phages; the authors judged Bl-04 alone to have minimal effects. Gut microbial diversity did not differ between groups. Adverse events were mild or moderate, and the Bl-04 alone group reported the most.

7
Blood Safety Tests Over 5 Months of Bl-04
PubMed

Safety analysis of the randomized, placebo-controlled trial in active adults; Bl-04 alone, a two-strain blend, or placebo for 150 days. Two authors worked for DuPont/Danisco (Cox et al. 2014, Eur J Clin Nutr)

Healthy, physically active adults from the Australian Institute of Sport trial.

Routine blood counts and clinical chemistry differed from placebo in few measures, with exceptions including plasma calcium and urea, with changes that were small and stayed within laboratory reference ranges. No obvious safety or tolerability issues were seen.

Side effects and drug interactions

Common Potential side effects

In a 5-month trial in healthy active adults, routine blood counts and clinical chemistry stayed within reference ranges; small differences from placebo in plasma calcium and urea were within normal limits.
In the larger rhinovirus challenge trial, no adverse events were judged definitely or probably related to Bl-04.
In a 4-week digestive trial, side effects were mild or moderate, such as constipation, bloating, gas or tiredness, and the Bl-04 alone group reported the most events.
Bl-04 carries a tetracycline resistance gene (tetW) that earlier work found not to be transferable; a rat study found no acute toxicity at very high doses.
Serious infections from probiotics have been reported in severely ill or immunocompromised children, including those with central venous catheters; avoid probiotics in these settings unless the medical team advises them.
Yogurt and fermented milk forms contain milk; check the label if you have a milk allergy.

Important Drug interactions

No drug interaction studies of Bl-04 have been published in the cited research.
Antibiotics: in a blend trial, Bl-04 was still recovered in stool when taken during an antibiotic course; ask your pharmacist about spacing doses from antibiotics.
Immunosuppressants and chemotherapy: people with weakened immune systems or central venous catheters should use probiotics only with medical advice because of the rare risk of serious infection.

Frequently asked questions about Bifidobacterium lactis Bl-04 (Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis Bl-04)

What is Bifidobacterium lactis Bl-04?

Bl-04 is a specific probiotic strain of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis, deposited as ATCC SD5219 and made by IFF (formerly Danisco and DuPont). It is studied mainly for immune support in healthy adults and is sold alone or in multi-strain blends.

Is Bl-04 the same as BB-12 or HN019?

No. All three belong to the same subspecies, and their genomes are very similar, but probiotic effects are judged strain by strain. BB-12 and HN019 trials do not show what Bl-04 does, and Bl-04 trials do not show what they do. Check the strain name on the label.

How much Bl-04 was used in studies?

The powder trials for respiratory outcomes used 2 billion CFU a day stirred into a drink, for 28 days to about 5 months. A digestive trial used 1 billion CFU a day. Follow the product label or your clinician's advice.

Does Bl-04 support immune health?

One large trial in active adults found fewer upper respiratory illness episodes with Bl-04 than placebo. Two later trials that exposed volunteers to a cold virus found no reduction in infection or illness. The maker funded all three, so the evidence is limited.

Is Bl-04 safe?

In trials lasting up to 5 months in healthy adults, no serious safety problems were linked to Bl-04; one 4-week digestive trial reported mild or moderate side effects such as bloating, gas or constipation. People who are severely ill, immunocompromised or have a central venous catheter should use probiotics only with medical advice.

What is Bifidobacterium lactis Bl-04 used for?

Bifidobacterium lactis Bl-04 is researched primarily for Immune Support. In a 150-day placebo-controlled trial in 465 healthy, physically active adults, 2 billion CFU of Bl-04 a day lowered the risk of an upper respiratory illness episode (hazard ratio 0.73) and delayed the first episode by about 0.7 months.

Does Bifidobacterium lactis Bl-04 interact with any medications?

Possible interactions include: No drug interaction studies of Bl-04 have been published in the cited research. Antibiotics: in a blend trial, Bl-04 was still recovered in stool when taken during an antibiotic course; ask your pharmacist about spacing doses from antibiotics. If you take prescription medication, check with a pharmacist or doctor before using it.

How strong is the scientific evidence for Bifidobacterium lactis Bl-04?

NutraSmarts rates the evidence for Bifidobacterium lactis Bl-04 as Limited (2 out of 5). It is backed by 7 study summaries and 15 cited references summarized on this page. A higher rating reflects more, larger, and better-designed human studies.

References(15 citations)

Evidence ratings on NutraSmarts are based on the totality of human clinical research, with emphasis on randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews. The references below directly support claims made throughout this page.

  1. West NP, Horn PL, Pyne DB, Gebski VJ, Lahtinen SJ, Fricker PA, Cripps AW. Probiotic supplementation for respiratory and gastrointestinal illness symptoms in healthy physically active individuals. Clin Nutr. 2014;33(4):581-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.10.002.PubMedUsed to support: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 465 healthy, physically active adults: Bl-04 at 2 billion CFU a day lowered the risk of an upper respiratory illness episode versus placebo (hazard ratio 0.73, p=0.022) and delayed the median time to a first episode from 2.5 to 3.2 months; L. acidophilus NCFM plus B. lactis Bi-07 did not differ significantly from placebo. One author was from DuPont/Danisco; the registry lists Danisco Finland as sponsor and funder, and lists this arm at 20 billion CFU a day, while the paper reports 2 billion.
  2. Cox AJ, West NP, Horn PL, Lehtinen MJ, Koerbin G, Pyne DB, Lahtinen SJ, Fricker PA, Cripps AW. Effects of probiotic supplementation over 5 months on routine haematology and clinical chemistry measures in healthy active adults. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2014;68(11):1255-7. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2014.137.PubMedUsed to support: Safety analysis of the same 150-day trial: Bl-04 alone or a two-strain blend caused few changes in routine blood counts and clinical chemistry versus placebo; plasma calcium and urea differed slightly but stayed within reference ranges. Two authors were from DuPont/Danisco.
  3. Turner RB, Woodfolk JA, Borish L, Steinke JW, Patrie JT, Muehling LM, Lahtinen S, Lehtinen MJ. Effect of probiotic on innate inflammatory response and viral shedding in experimental rhinovirus infection - a randomised controlled trial. Benef Microbes. 2017;8(2):207-215. doi: 10.3920/BM2016.0160.PubMedUsed to support: Randomized, placebo-controlled rhinovirus challenge trial in 152 adults: 28 days of Bl-04 (at least 2 billion CFU a day) raised baseline nasal CXCL8, reduced the CXCL8 response to infection, lowered virus titers and the share shedding virus (76% versus 91%), but did not change symptom scores or infection rate. Funded by Danisco Sweeteners Oy; two authors were sponsor employees.
  4. Turner RB, Lehtoranta L, Hibberd A, Männikkö S, Zabel B, Yeung N, Huttunen T, Burns FR, Lehtinen MJ. Effect of Bifidobacterium animalis spp. lactis Bl-04 on Rhinovirus-Induced Colds: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Single-Center, Phase II Trial in Healthy Volunteers. EClinicalMedicine. 2022;43:101224. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101224.PubMedUsed to support: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II rhinovirus challenge trial in 334 healthy adults: Bl-04 for 28 days did not lower rhinovirus-associated illness (56% versus 50%, p=0.34), and duration, infection, virus titers and symptom scores did not differ. Funded by Danisco Sweeteners Oy (now IFF); several authors were IFF staff.
  5. Zhang H, Miao J, Su M, Liu BY, Liu Z. Effect of fermented milk on upper respiratory tract infection in adults who lived in the haze area of Northern China: a randomized clinical trial. Pharm Biol. 2021;59(1):647-652. doi: 10.1080/13880209.2021.1929344.PubMedUsed to support: Randomized trial in 136 adults in northern China: a 250 g daily yogurt with Bl-04 (over 2 billion CFU per 100 g) and fruit jams for 12 weeks reduced common colds (OR 0.38) and influenza-like illness (OR 0.32) and shortened respiratory symptoms versus a control yogurt without Bl-04 or the jams. Three authors worked for Bright Dairy, which made the yogurts.
  6. Grubb DS, Wrigley SD, Freedman KE, Wei Y, Vazquez AR, Trotter RE, Wallace TC, Johnson SA, Weir TL. PHAGE-2 Study: Supplemental Bacteriophages Extend Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BL04 Benefits on Gut Health and Microbiota in Healthy Adults. Nutrients. 2020;12(8):2474. doi: 10.3390/nu12082474.PubMedUsed to support: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 4-week trial in 68 healthy adults: no symptom score differed between groups; within groups, gastric function improved with Bl-04 alone at 1 billion CFU a day and GI inflammation improved with Bl-04 plus bacteriophages; microbial diversity did not differ, and the authors judged Bl-04 alone to have minimal effects. Funded by Deerland Enzymes, maker of the phage product.
  7. Paineau D, Carcano D, Leyer G, Darquy S, Alyanakian MA, Simoneau G, Bergmann JF, Brassart D, Bornet F, Ouwehand AC. Effects of seven potential probiotic strains on specific immune responses in healthy adults: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2008;53(1):107-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2008.00413.x.PubMedUsed to support: Double-blind randomized trial in 83 healthy adults comparing seven single probiotic strains at 20 billion CFU a day with maltodextrin for 3 weeks around an oral cholera vaccine: Bl-04 and L. acidophilus La-14 increased vaccine-specific serum IgG versus control (p=0.01); salivary IgA did not differ and overall vaccination was not influenced.
  8. Airaksinen K, Yeung N, Lyra A, Lahtinen SJ, Huttunen T, Shanahan F, Ouwehand AC. The effect of a probiotic blend on gastrointestinal symptoms in constipated patients: a double blind, randomised, placebo controlled 2-week trial. Benef Microbes. 2019;10(6):617-627. doi: 10.3920/BM2018.0163.PubMedUsed to support: Blend, not Bl-04 alone: randomized, placebo-controlled 2-week trial in 156 adults with functional constipation of NCFM, Lpc-37, Bl-04 (2.5 billion CFU), Bi-07 and HN019; the blend did not improve the primary outcome of bloating or secondary outcomes such as transit time and bowel movement frequency. Authors were mainly DuPont staff.
  9. Forssten SD, Yeung N, Ouwehand AC. Fecal Recovery of Probiotics Administered as a Multi-Strain Formulation during Antibiotic Treatment. Biomedicines. 2020;8(4):83. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines8040083.PubMedUsed to support: Blend, not Bl-04 alone: stool samples from a randomized, placebo-controlled antibiotic trial of NCFM, Lpc-37, Bi-07 and Bl-04 in equal amounts (10 billion CFU total) showed Bl-04 detectable in more subjects than placebo during and a week after antibiotics, returning to baseline after intake stopped. Authors were employees of DuPont, which makes the strains.
  10. Ouwehand AC, Nermes M, Collado MC, Rautonen N, Salminen S, Isolauri E. Specific probiotics alleviate allergic rhinitis during the birch pollen season. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15(26):3261-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.3261.PubMedUsed to support: Blend, not Bl-04 alone: randomized, double-blind trial in 47 children with birch pollen allergy given L. acidophilus NCFM plus B. lactis Bl-04 or placebo for 4 months. It names the strain deposit as ATCC SD5219; the blend reduced nasal eosinophil infiltration, while nasal symptoms showed only trends.
  11. Morovic W, Roper JM, Smith AB, Mukerji P, Stahl B, Rae JC, Ouwehand AC. Safety evaluation of HOWARU(®) Restore (Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM, Lactobacillus paracasei Lpc-37, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis Bl-04 and B. lactis Bi-07) for antibiotic resistance, genomic risk factors, and acute toxicity. Food Chem Toxicol. 2017;110:316-324. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2017.10.037.PubMedUsed to support: Maker safety evaluation of the HOWARU® Restore strains: only Bl-04 showed antibiotic resistance above a regulated threshold, due to a tetW gene previously shown to be non-transferable; no toxin genes were found, and rats showed no acute toxicity at 1.7 to 4.1 trillion CFU per kg. Authors were DuPont staff.
  12. Barrangou R, Briczinski EP, Traeger LL, Loquasto JR, Richards M, Horvath P, Coûté-Monvoisin AC, Leyer G, Rendulic S, Steele JL, Broadbent JR, Oberg T, Dudley EG, Schuster S, Romero DA, Roberts RF. Comparison of the complete genome sequences of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis DSM 10140 and Bl-04. J Bacteriol. 2009;191(13):4144-51. doi: 10.1128/JB.00155-09.PubMedUsed to support: Genome study by Danisco and academic authors: Bl-04 and DSM 10140 differ by 47 single nucleotide changes and a CRISPR region; the genomes point to carbohydrate use, bile and acid resistance and interaction with gut lining cells, and the strains cannot be told apart by standard methods such as pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.
  13. Latvala S, Lehtinen MJ, Mäkelä SM, Nedveck D, Zabel B, Ahonen I, Lehtoranta L, Turner RB, Liljavirta J. The effect of probiotic Bifidobacterium lactis Bl-04 on innate antiviral responses invitro. Heliyon. 2024;10(8):e29588. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29588.PubMedUsed to support: Lab study by IFF staff: Bl-04 mildly stimulated antiviral responses and boosted cytokine production in human macrophages and dendritic cells, but had a negligible effect on rhinovirus replication in fibroblasts. Not a human trial.
  14. Zabel B, Mäkelä SM, Nedveck D, Hibberd AA, Yeung N, Latvala S, Lehtoranta L, Junnila J, Walters KB, Morovic W, Lehtinen MJ. The Effect of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis Bl-04 on Influenza A Virus Infection in Mice. Microorganisms. 2023;11(10):2582. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11102582.PubMedUsed to support: Mouse study by IFF staff: oral Bl-04 lowered lung influenza A (H1N1) viral load by 48% on day 3 and reduced day 4 symptoms versus placebo; transcriptomic results were inconclusive. Animal work only.
  15. Goldenberg JZ, Lytvyn L, Steurich J, Parkin P, Mahant S, Johnston BC. Probiotics for the prevention of pediatric antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(12):CD004827. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004827.pub4.PubMedUsed to support: Cochrane review of probiotics in children taking antibiotics: no serious adverse events were attributed to probiotics in otherwise healthy children, but serious adverse events have been seen in severely debilitated or immunocompromised children with risk factors such as central venous catheters. Cited here for general probiotic safety, not for Bl-04.