Shark Cartilage

Evidence Level
Preliminary
7 Clinical Trials
5 Documented Benefits
1/5 Evidence Score

Shark cartilage is dried, powdered shark skeleton tissue. It contains chondroitin sulfate, collagen and a high level of calcium. It became popular on the claim that sharks rarely get cancer, but sharks do develop benign and malignant tumors. Two large placebo-controlled trials supported by the US National Cancer Institute tested it as an add-on to standard care: a shark cartilage product (BeneFin) in 83 people with advanced breast or colorectal cancer, and the liquid extract AE-941 (Neovastat) in 379 people with stage III lung cancer. Neither improved survival. No published trial has tested shark cartilage powder itself for joint comfort; that evidence belongs to purified chondroitin. Reported side effects include stomach upset, altered taste and high blood calcium, and tests have found the neurotoxin BMAA and low levels of mercury in commercial products.

Studied Dose No dose has a shown benefit. Powder at 1 g per kg of body weight a day (about 70 g for a 70 kg adult) in an open study; purified shark chondroitin sulfate at 1.2 g and 4 g as single absorption doses. The liquid extract AE-941 was dosed in mL, 120 mL twice daily in the largest trial.
Active Compound Dried shark cartilage, which contains chondroitin sulfate, type II collagen and calcium. AE-941 (Neovastat) was a standardized liquid extract developed as an investigational drug.

Benefits

Chondroitin sulfate from shark cartilage reaches the blood

In two absorption studies in healthy volunteers, purified chondroitin sulfate made from shark cartilage was partly absorbed after a single oral dose of 1.2 g or 4 g. Plasma levels peaked after about 4 to 9 hours. These studies measured blood levels only, and used a purified extract rather than whole cartilage powder.

Joint support claims rest on chondroitin, not shark cartilage trials

Shark cartilage is often sold for joints because it contains chondroitin. No randomized trial has tested shark cartilage powder itself for joint comfort. The joint evidence comes from purified chondroitin sulfate products, covered in the separate chondroitin entry.

No added benefit in two large placebo-controlled trials

Large trials found no benefit as an add-on to standard care. In 83 people with advanced breast or colorectal cancer, a shark cartilage product did not change survival or quality of life versus placebo. In 379 people with stage III lung cancer, the extract AE-941 added to chemoradiotherapy did not improve survival (median 14.4 vs 15.6 months).

High-dose powder in a 60-person open study

In an open study without a control group, 60 adults with advanced cancer took shark cartilage powder at 1 g per kg of body weight a day. No tumor responded, quality of life did not improve, and 5 of 47 fully assessed people stopped because of stomach side effects or intolerance. The authors judged the rate of stable disease similar to what is seen with supportive care alone.

Blood-vessel growth in a wound model in healthy men

In 29 healthy men, a liquid shark cartilage extract taken daily for 23 days lowered the density of blood-vessel cells growing into a small sponge implanted under the skin, compared with placebo. This is a lab marker of new vessel growth in a wound, not a health outcome.

Mechanism of action

1

The blood-vessel growth idea (lab and animal work)

Cartilage has no blood vessels, which led to the idea that it holds substances that block new vessel growth. Laboratory work found that extracts such as AE-941 interfere with a vessel growth signal (VEGF) and with tissue-degrading enzymes. That active components reach target tissues after eating crude cartilage has not been shown, and placebo-controlled trials in people found no clinical benefit.

2

A source of chondroitin and collagen

Shark cartilage supplies chondroitin sulfate and type II collagen. In volunteers, part of a purified shark chondroitin dose was absorbed: in one study about 10% as large chains and about 20% as smaller fragments.

3

Immune-cell activation in lab tests

In test-tube studies with human white blood cells, extracts of a commercial shark cartilage supplement triggered inflammatory signals (interferon gamma and chemokines), with a type II collagen protein identified as one active component. Effects of eating the product on inflammation in people are unknown.

Clinical trials

1
Shark Cartilage Product (BeneFin) Added to Standard Care: NCCTG Placebo-Controlled RCT
PubMed

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of a shark cartilage product (BeneFin, per ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00026117, with the National Cancer Institute as collaborator) taken 3 to 4 times a day alongside standard care. Primary outcome: overall survival. (Loprinzi et al. 2005, Cancer)

83 evaluable adults with incurable breast or colorectal cancer and good performance status; chemotherapy was allowed.

Overall survival did not differ between shark cartilage and placebo, and there was no suggestion of better quality of life. The authors concluded the trial could not show any suggestion of efficacy for the product.

2
AE-941 (Neovastat) Added to Chemoradiotherapy: Phase III Placebo-Controlled RCT
PubMed

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial at US and Canadian centers with the US National Cancer Institute as lead sponsor (NCT00005838); oral AE-941, a standardized liquid shark cartilage extract, 120 mL twice daily. Closed early in 2006 for slow enrollment. (Lu et al. 2010, J Natl Cancer Inst)

379 eligible patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer receiving chemotherapy and chest radiotherapy (188 AE-941, 191 placebo).

Median overall survival was 14.4 months with AE-941 and 15.6 months with placebo (P = .73). Time to progression, progression-free survival and tumor response also did not differ. The authors concluded the study does not support shark cartilage-derived products as therapy for lung cancer.

3
High-Dose Shark Cartilage Powder: Phase I/II Open Study (no control group)
PubMed

Single-arm phase I/II study of oral shark cartilage powder at 1 g/kg a day in three divided doses, with no other anticancer therapy, assessed at 6 and 12 weeks. (Miller et al. 1998, J Clin Oncol)

60 adults with advanced, previously treated cancer of various types; 47 were fully assessable.

No complete or partial tumor responses occurred and quality of life did not improve. Ten of 50 assessable patients (16.7% of all 60 enrolled) had stable disease for 12 weeks or more, a rate the authors judged similar to supportive care alone. Five people stopped because of stomach side effects or intolerance; 14 of 21 recorded adverse events were digestive (nausea, vomiting, constipation).

4
Liquid Shark Cartilage Extract and Wound Blood-Vessel Growth in 29 Healthy Men: RCT
PubMed

Randomized, placebo-controlled study of a liquid shark cartilage extract (7 or 21 mL a day) taken for 23 days, with a small sponge implanted under the arm skin from day 12 to day 23 to measure new vessel growth. (Berbari et al. 1999, J Surg Res)

29 healthy male volunteers in three groups.

Endothelial cell density in the sponge was lower with the extract (grades 2.24 and 2.47 for 7 and 21 mL) than with placebo (3.15; P < 0.01). Collagen content of the sponge (hydroxyproline) did not differ. This is a lab marker of wound vessel growth, not a health outcome.

5
AE-941 Dose-Comparison Study in Plaque Psoriasis (no placebo group)
PubMed

Randomized phase I/II dose-comparison trial of oral AE-941 at 30, 60, 120 or 240 mL a day for 12 weeks, with 12 weeks of follow-up. (Sauder et al. 2002, J Am Acad Dermatol)

49 adults with plaque psoriasis.

PASI scores improved in 50%, 41.7% and 30.8% of patients on 240, 120 and 60 mL a day, and in none at 30 mL, a significant dose trend. With no placebo arm, the size of any true effect is unknown. Digestive side effects (mainly nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, gas and constipation) occurred in 12 of 49 patients. AE-941 was an investigational drug, not a supplement.

6
Absorption of Shark Cartilage Chondroitin Sulfate in 20 Healthy Men
PubMed

Single-dose absorption study of 4 g of chondroitin sulfate from shark cartilage, with plasma sampling over 48 hours. (Volpi 2003, Osteoarthritis Cartilage)

20 healthy male volunteers.

Plasma chondroitin sulfate rose by more than 120%, peaking at about 8.7 hours (average peak 4.87 micrograms per mL), with the rise significant from 4 to 16 hours. Absorption was slow. No joint or symptom outcomes were measured.

7
Fate of Partially Depolymerized Shark Chondroitin Sulfate in 10 Volunteers
PubMed

Pharmacokinetic study of partially depolymerized shark chondroitin sulfate given as single doses of 0.2 g by injection and 1.2 g by mouth. (Ronca et al. 1993, Int J Clin Pharmacol Res)

10 healthy volunteers (5 men, 5 women) aged 25 to 53.

After the oral dose, plasma levels peaked at 240 minutes (4.6 micrograms per mL). About 10% of the oral dose was absorbed as high-molecular-weight and about 20% as low-molecular-weight derivatives. No clinical outcomes were measured.

Side effects and drug interactions

Common Potential side effects

Digestive upset is the most common complaint: nausea, vomiting, constipation, cramping and bloating have been reported with shark cartilage powder. In one study at a very high dose (1 g per kg a day), 5 of 47 people stopped because of stomach side effects or intolerance.
Altered taste: taste alteration was the most frequent side effect (13.6%) in a study of the liquid extract AE-941.
Calcium load: shark cartilage is high in calcium, and high blood calcium has been reported with powdered shark cartilage. A Cleveland Clinic case series described 8 people with cancer whose high blood calcium may have been caused or worsened by calcium, vitamin D or shark cartilage supplements.
One case of hepatitis (liver inflammation) has been linked to powdered shark cartilage in the medical literature. Stop and see a doctor if you notice yellowing of the skin or eyes or dark urine.
Contamination: in tests of 16 commercial shark cartilage supplements, 15 contained the neurotoxin BMAA (86 to 265 micrograms per gram) and all contained low levels of mercury. The effect of eating BMAA in these amounts is unknown.
Conservation: researchers have linked the promotion of shark cartilage to a dramatic decline in shark populations.

Important Drug interactions

Calcium and vitamin D supplements: shark cartilage adds calcium, and these supplements may have contributed to high blood calcium in a case series of people with cancer. Ask a doctor before combining them.
Cancer treatment: in two placebo-controlled trials, shark cartilage or its extract AE-941 added nothing to standard care. Tell your oncologist before taking it, and do not use it in place of prescribed treatment.
Other drug interactions have not been well studied.

Frequently asked questions about Shark Cartilage

Do the popular claims about shark cartilage hold up?

No. The idea that sharks do not get cancer is false: benign and malignant tumors have been documented in sharks. Two large placebo-controlled trials supported by the US National Cancer Institute, one of a shark cartilage product and one of the extract AE-941, found no survival benefit when added to standard care. In 2000 the FTC settled charges that a seller made unsubstantiated cancer claims for its shark cartilage product.

Is shark cartilage a good way to get chondroitin?

It contains chondroitin sulfate, and purified shark chondroitin is partly absorbed. But no randomized trial has tested shark cartilage powder itself for joint comfort, and whole powder also brings calcium and possible contaminants. If chondroitin is your goal, purified chondroitin sulfate is the form that has been studied; see the separate chondroitin entry.

What happened to AE-941 (Neovastat)?

AE-941 was a standardized liquid shark cartilage extract developed as an investigational drug, not a supplement. Small early studies without placebo groups reported dose trends, but a phase III trial in 379 people with lung cancer found no survival benefit over placebo. A phase III trial in kidney cancer enrolled about 300 patients, but its comparison with placebo had not been reported in a peer-reviewed journal as of the National Cancer Institute's last update of its summary in 2018.

Is shark cartilage safe to take?

Stomach upset such as nausea is the most commonly reported problem, and taste changes were the most frequent side effect in one study of the liquid extract. Shark cartilage is high in calcium, and high blood calcium has been reported, so take care if you also use calcium or vitamin D supplements. One case of hepatitis has been reported. Tests of commercial products found the neurotoxin BMAA in 15 of 16 and low levels of mercury in all.

Does buying shark cartilage affect shark populations?

Researchers have linked the promotion of shark cartilage to a dramatic decline in shark populations. Because no health benefit of shark cartilage itself has been shown in people, that cost is not offset by a proven gain.

What is Shark Cartilage?

Shark cartilage is dried, powdered shark skeleton tissue. It contains chondroitin sulfate, collagen and a high level of calcium. It became popular on the claim that sharks rarely get cancer, but sharks do develop benign and malignant tumors.

What is Shark Cartilage used for?

Shark Cartilage has several researched uses. In two absorption studies in healthy volunteers, purified chondroitin sulfate made from shark cartilage was partly absorbed after a single oral dose of 1.2 g or 4 g. Plasma levels peaked after about 4 to 9 hours.

What is the recommended dosage of Shark Cartilage?

The clinically studied dose is No dose has a shown benefit. Powder at 1 g per kg of body weight a day (about 70 g for a 70 kg adult) in an open study; purified shark chondroitin sulfate at 1.2 g and 4 g as single absorption doses. Always follow the product label and check with a healthcare provider for personal advice.

Is Shark Cartilage safe, and does it have side effects?

Side effects and cautions reported for Shark Cartilage include: Digestive upset is the most common complaint: nausea, vomiting, constipation, cramping and bloating have been reported with shark cartilage powder. In one study at a very high dose (1 g per kg a day), 5 of 47 people stopped because of stomach side effects or intolerance. It may also interact with some medications. Shark Cartilage is not right for everyone, so check with a healthcare provider first if you are pregnant or breastfeeding, have a medical condition, or take prescription medication.

Does Shark Cartilage interact with any medications?

Possible interactions include: Calcium and vitamin D supplements: shark cartilage adds calcium, and these supplements may have contributed to high blood calcium in a case series of people with cancer. Ask a doctor before combining them. If you take prescription medication, check with a pharmacist or doctor before using it.

How strong is the scientific evidence for Shark Cartilage?

NutraSmarts rates the evidence for Shark Cartilage as Preliminary (1 out of 5). It is backed by 7 clinical trials and 15 cited references summarized on this page. A higher rating reflects more, larger, and better-designed human studies.

References(15 citations)

Evidence ratings on NutraSmarts are based on the totality of human clinical research, with emphasis on randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews. The references below directly support claims made throughout this page.

  1. Loprinzi CL, Levitt R, Barton DL, Sloan JA, Atherton PJ, Smith DJ, Dakhil SR, Moore DF Jr, Krook JE, Rowland KM Jr, Mazurczak MA, Berg AR, Kim GP, North Central Cancer Treatment Group. Evaluation of shark cartilage in patients with advanced cancer: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group trial. Cancer. 2005;104(1):176-82. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21107.PubMedUsed to support: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 83 evaluable adults with incurable breast or colorectal cancer receiving standard care: a shark cartilage product taken 3 to 4 times daily did not change overall survival and showed no suggestion of better quality of life.
  2. Lu C, Lee JJ, Komaki R, Herbst RS, Feng L, Evans WK, Choy H, Desjardins P, Esparaz BT, Truong MT, Saxman S, Kelaghan J, Bleyer A, Fisch MJ. Chemoradiotherapy with or without AE-941 in stage III non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized phase III trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102(12):859-65. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq179.PubMedUsed to support: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial in 379 patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer: adding the shark cartilage extract AE-941 to chemoradiotherapy did not improve overall survival (median 14.4 vs 15.6 months, P = .73), time to progression, progression-free survival or tumor response. The trial closed early for slow enrollment.
  3. Miller DR, Anderson GT, Stark JJ, Granick JL, Richardson D. Phase I/II trial of the safety and efficacy of shark cartilage in the treatment of advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16(11):3649-55. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.11.3649.PubMedUsed to support: Single-arm study in 60 adults with advanced, previously treated cancer taking shark cartilage powder 1 g/kg a day: no complete or partial responses, no improvement in quality of life, and a stable disease rate similar to supportive care alone. Five of 47 assessable patients stopped for stomach side effects or intolerance; 14 of 21 adverse events were digestive.
  4. Berbari P, Thibodeau A, Germain L, Saint-Cyr M, Gaudreau P, Elkhouri S, Dupont E, Garrel DR, Elkouri S. Antiangiogenic effects of the oral administration of liquid cartilage extract in humans. J Surg Res. 1999;87(1):108-13. doi: 10.1006/jsre.1999.5698.PubMedUsed to support: Randomized, placebo-controlled study in 29 healthy men: a liquid shark cartilage extract (7 or 21 mL a day for 23 days) lowered endothelial cell density in a sponge implanted under the skin versus placebo, a lab marker of wound blood-vessel growth; sponge hydroxyproline content did not differ.
  5. Sauder DN, Dekoven J, Champagne P, Croteau D, Dupont E. Neovastat (AE-941), an inhibitor of angiogenesis: Randomized phase I/II clinical trial results in patients with plaque psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;47(4):535-41. doi: 10.1067/mjd.2002.124702.PubMedUsed to support: Randomized dose-comparison trial without a placebo group in 49 patients with plaque psoriasis taking oral AE-941 at 30 to 240 mL a day for 12 weeks: PASI improvement rose with dose (50% at 240 mL, none at 30 mL). Digestive side effects occurred in 12 of 49 patients.
  6. Volpi N. Oral absorption and bioavailability of ichthyic origin chondroitin sulfate in healthy male volunteers. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2003;11(6):433-41. doi: 10.1016/s1063-4584(03)00051-7.PubMedUsed to support: In 20 healthy men given 4 g of chondroitin sulfate from shark cartilage, plasma chondroitin sulfate rose by more than 120%, peaking at about 8.7 hours; absorption was slow. Blood levels only, no clinical outcomes.
  7. Ronca G, Conte A. Metabolic fate of partially depolymerized shark chondroitin sulfate in man. Int J Clin Pharmacol Res. 1993;13 Suppl:27-34..PubMedUsed to support: In 10 healthy volunteers, partially depolymerized shark chondroitin sulfate given as 1.2 g by mouth peaked in plasma at 240 minutes; about 10% was absorbed as high-molecular-weight and about 20% as low-molecular-weight derivatives.
  8. Batist G, Patenaude F, Champagne P, Croteau D, Levinton C, Hariton C, Escudier B, Dupont E. Neovastat (AE-941) in refractory renal cell carcinoma patients: report of a phase II trial with two dose levels. Ann Oncol. 2002;13(8):1259-63. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdf195.PubMedUsed to support: Phase II trial without a placebo group in 144 patients with refractory solid tumors given oral AE-941 at 60 or 240 mL a day; no dose-limiting toxicity was reported, and taste alteration was the most frequent adverse event (13.6%). A survival analysis in 22 kidney cancer patients favored the higher dose.
  9. Escudier B, Choueiri TK, Oudard S, Szczylik C, Négrier S, Ravaud A, Chevreau C, Venner P, Champagne P, Croteau D, Dupont E, Hariton C, Bukowski RM. Prognostic factors of metastatic renal cell carcinoma after failure of immunotherapy: new paradigm from a large phase III trial with shark cartilage extract AE 941. J Urol. 2007;178(5):1901-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.07.035.PubMedUsed to support: Prognostic-factor analysis of 300 patients with advanced kidney cancer treated in a phase III trial of AE-941; median survival for the whole cohort was 12.6 months. The abstract does not report an AE-941 versus placebo comparison.
  10. Merly L, Smith SL. Pro-inflammatory properties of shark cartilage supplement. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2015;37(2):140-7. doi: 10.3109/08923973.2014.999160.PubMedUsed to support: Laboratory study with human white blood cells: extracts of a commercial shark cartilage supplement triggered an inflammatory response (interferon gamma, MCP-1 and RANTES), with monocytes responding first; earlier work identified a type II collagen protein as an active component. The authors note joint benefits remain questionable.
  11. Mondo K, Broc Glover W, Murch SJ, Liu G, Cai Y, Davis DA, Mash DC. Environmental neurotoxins β-N-methylamino-l-alanine (BMAA) and mercury in shark cartilage dietary supplements. Food Chem Toxicol. 2014;70:26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2014.04.015.PubMedUsed to support: Testing of 16 commercial shark cartilage supplements found the neurotoxin BMAA in 15 (86 to 265 micrograms per gram dry weight) and low concentrations of mercury in all; the neurotoxic potential of dietary BMAA is unknown.
  12. Lagman R, Walsh D. Dangerous nutrition? Calcium, vitamin D, and shark cartilage nutritional supplements and cancer-related hypercalcemia. Support Care Cancer. 2003;11(4):232-5. doi: 10.1007/s00520-002-0428-2.PubMedUsed to support: Case series of 8 cancer patients at the Cleveland Clinic with hypercalcemia in whom vitamin D, calcium or shark cartilage supplements may have contributed to its occurrence or severity.
  13. Ostrander GK, Cheng KC, Wolf JC, Wolfe MJ. Shark cartilage, cancer and the growing threat of pseudoscience. Cancer Res. 2004;64(23):8485-91. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-2260.PubMedUsed to support: Review documenting benign and malignant tumors in sharks and their relatives, contradicting the claim that sharks do not get cancer; concludes evidence supports neither crude cartilage extracts nor the ability of active components to reach cancer cells, and links the promotion of shark cartilage to a dramatic decline in shark populations.
  14. PDQ Integrative, Alternative, and Complementary Therapies Editorial Board. Cartilage (Bovine and Shark) (PDQ®): Health Professional Version. PDQ Cancer Information Summaries. 2002;Bethesda (MD): National Cancer Institute (US); 2002-. Last updated 2018 Aug 23. Bookshelf ID: NBK65762..PubMedUsed to support: US National Cancer Institute summary (no longer updated after 2018): lists nausea, vomiting, cramping, bloating, constipation and high blood calcium with powdered shark cartilage, notes its high calcium content and one hepatitis case, describes the FDA refund program for buyers of the BeneFin product (1999 to 2004), states FDA has not approved cartilage to treat any condition, and reports that results of the placebo-controlled AE-941 kidney cancer phase III trial had not been reported in the peer-reviewed literature.
  15. Federal Trade Commission. "Operation Cure.all" Nets Shark Cartilage Promoters: Two Companies Charged with Making False And Unsubstantiated Claims for Their Shark Cartilage And Skin Cream as Cancer Treatments. FTC press release. 2000;June 29, 2000..SourceUsed to support: Not PubMed-indexed (official FTC press release). The FTC charged Lane Labs-USA and Cartilage Consultants with unsubstantiated claims that the shark cartilage product BeneFin prevents, treats or cures cancer, and with falsely claiming that clinical studies proved it treats cancer and that the FDA had evaluated its effectiveness. Under the settlement, without admitting wrongdoing, Lane Labs agreed to a $1 million judgment: $550,000 to the FTC and $450,000 to buy shark cartilage and placebo for a clinical study sponsored by the National Cancer Institute and Lane Labs.