Multivitamin / Multimineral

Multi-ingredient nutrient supplement
Evidence Level
Moderate
3 Clinical Trials
4 Documented Benefits
3/5 Evidence Score

A multivitamin combines a broad range of vitamins and minerals in one daily dose, serving as nutritional insurance to help fill gaps in an imperfect diet. Rather than a proven way to prevent disease in well-nourished people, it is best viewed as a safety net, most useful for those with limited or restricted diets, higher nutrient needs, or specific shortfalls. Formulas are often tailored by age and sex; for example, many men's and postmenopausal versions omit iron, which those groups rarely need extra of. Taking it with a meal containing some fat improves absorption of the fat-soluble vitamins and reduces the chance of nausea.

Studied Dose One tablet daily. Both large trials, PHS II and COSMOS, used Centrum Silver, a standard once-daily multivitamin at roughly 100% DV for most vitamins.
Active Compound Variable formula; typically 13 vitamins (A, C, D, E, K, B1, B2, B3, B5, B6, B7, B9, B12) and 10–20 minerals (Ca, Mg, Zn, Fe, Cu, Se, Mn, Cr, I, Mo, K, P, B).

Benefits

What the 11-year PHS II trial in male physicians did and did not find

In 14,641 male US physicians aged 50 and over, followed a median 11.2 years, a daily Centrum Silver reduced total cancer diagnoses from 18.3 to 17.0 per 1,000 person-years (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.86 to 0.998, p=0.04). That is the whole of the positive result. There was no effect on prostate cancer (HR 0.98), colorectal cancer (HR 0.89), lung cancer (HR 0.84), cancer mortality (HR 0.88, p=0.07) or death from any cause (HR 0.94, p=0.13). The larger figure often quoted for the 1,312 men with a previous cancer (HR 0.73) is a subgroup, and it did not differ significantly from the rest of the trial (p for interaction 0.07). One trial, in one unusually healthy and well-nourished group of doctors, is not a reason to take a multivitamin in the hope of avoiding cancer.

COSMOS: the trial that missed its main cancer endpoint

COSMOS randomized 21,442 US adults (women 65 and over, men 60 and over) to a daily Centrum Silver or placebo for a median 3.6 years. Its primary outcome, total invasive cancer, was null: 518 cases on multivitamin against 535 on placebo (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.09, p=0.57). So were breast cancer (HR 1.06), colorectal cancer (HR 1.30), the cardiovascular composite (HR 0.98) and death from any cause (HR 0.93). One secondary site came out lower, lung cancer (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.92), and that is a single positive finding among many comparisons inside a trial that missed the endpoint it was designed around. It has not been reproduced in an independent trial. The authors' own conclusion was that a daily multivitamin did not significantly reduce total cancer, and that 3.6 years may have been too short.

Cognitive aging slowed by about 2 years (COSMOS-Mind)

In 2,262 adults aged 65 and over, three years of a daily multivitamin improved a global cognition composite by 0.07 standard deviations against placebo (95% CI 0.02 to 0.12, p=0.007), with gains also in episodic memory and executive function. A 2024 pooled analysis of three non-overlapping cognitive substudies inside the same parent trial found the same 0.07 SD difference (95% CI 0.03 to 0.11, p=0.0009), which the authors describe as equivalent to about two years less cognitive aging. Two things a reader should know: the multivitamin comparison was the pre-specified secondary question in a trial whose primary agent, cocoa extract, did nothing (0.03 SD, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.08, p=0.28), and every result here comes from one parent trial, so no independent group has reproduced it. The reported advantage in people with a cardiovascular history did not reach significance on its own (0.14, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.31).

Filling micronutrient gaps in suboptimal diets

Counting food, fortified food and supplements together, NHANES 2003 to 2006 (n=16,110, ages 2 and over) put the share of Americans below the Estimated Average Requirement at 70 percent for vitamin D, 60 percent for vitamin E, 45 percent for magnesium, 38 percent for calcium, 34 percent for vitamin A and 25 percent for vitamin C. Potassium and vitamin K are set as Adequate Intakes rather than EARs, and only 3 percent and 35 percent of the population respectively reached them. In a separate NHANES analysis (2009 to 2012, n=10,698), adults taking a multivitamin at any frequency had a lower prevalence of inadequate intake for 15 of 17 nutrients examined, while intakes above the Tolerable Upper Intake Level rose for 7 nutrients, affecting no more than 4 percent of users for any one of them. Calcium, magnesium and vitamin D shortfalls persisted even in the most frequent users. Closing a measured shortfall is the clearest and best documented thing a daily multivitamin does, and it matters most for older adults, restrictive dieters and people with impaired absorption.

Mechanism of action

1

Replenishing micronutrient cofactors for hundreds of enzymatic reactions

B vitamins serve as cofactors for energy metabolism (B1, B2, B3, B5), one-carbon metabolism (B6, B9, B12), and DNA synthesis. Magnesium, zinc, and selenium serve as cofactors for hundreds of enzymes including those involved in DNA repair, antioxidant defense (superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase), and immune function. Even subclinical deficiencies impair enzymatic function and may accelerate aging-related decline.

2

Antioxidant defense (vitamins C, E, selenium, zinc)

Vitamins C and E and the trace minerals selenium, zinc, and copper support cellular antioxidant defense. Selenium-dependent glutathione peroxidase, copper/zinc-dependent superoxide dismutase, and vitamin C/E recycling all require adequate micronutrient status. This is a plausible mechanism and nothing more. In the two large trials that measured cancer directly, one found a small difference in total diagnoses and the other found none at all, so nothing in this pathway has been shown to produce a clinical result.

3

Micronutrient roles in immune cells and DNA methylation

Multiple micronutrients (vitamins A, D, E, B6, B12, folate, zinc, selenium, iron, copper) are essential for innate and adaptive immune function. Folate and B12 support DNA methylation patterns and chromosome stability. These are textbook biochemical roles, worked out from deficiency states. They are not evidence that a multivitamin improves immune function in someone already replete. In 910 community-dwelling adults aged 65 and over, a year of a daily multivitamin and multimineral did not reduce self-reported days of infection or contacts with primary care for infection. A separate 12-week randomized placebo-controlled trial in 42 healthy adults aged 55 to 75 measured whole-blood bacterial killing, neutrophil phagocytosis, salivary IgA and plasma cytokines and found no change in any of them, though a trial that small could not detect a modest effect.

Clinical trials

1
Physicians' Health Study II: 11-year randomized trial of a daily multivitamin in male physicians
PubMed

Large-scale randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (Gaziano JM, Sesso HD, Christen WG, Bubes V, Smith JP, MacFadyen J, Schvartz M, Manson JE, Glynn RJ, Buring JE 2012, JAMA 308(18):1871-1880, doi:10.1001/jama.2012.14641).

14,641 male U.S. physicians initially aged ≥50 (mean age 64.3). Including 1,312 men with cancer history. Randomized to daily Centrum Silver multivitamin or placebo. Treatment and follow-up 1997-2011 (median 11.2 years).

Total cancer incidence significantly reduced: 17.0 vs 18.3 events per 1,000 person-years (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.86-0.998, p=0.04), an 8% relative reduction. No significant effect on prostate cancer (HR 0.98), colorectal cancer (HR 0.89), or lung cancer (HR 0.84). Effect stronger in men with cancer history (HR 0.73) and men ≥70 (HR 0.82). 2,757 men (18.8%) died during follow-up, including 859 (5.9%) from cancer; neither cancer mortality (403 vs 456 deaths; HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.77-1.01, p=0.07) nor death from any cause (1,345 vs 1,412 deaths; HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.88-1.02, p=0.13) differed significantly between groups. Both subgroup results above are exploratory: the difference between men with and without a prior cancer was not statistically significant (p for interaction 0.07), and neither was the difference across age groups (p for interaction 0.06). Funding came from National Institutes of Health grants and an investigator-initiated grant from BASF Corporation, and the Centrum Silver was supplied by Pfizer, which made it.

2
COSMOS: primary cancer outcome was NULL (the lung-cancer result is an exploratory secondary)
PubMed

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (Sesso HD, Rist PM, Aragaki AK, Rautiainen S, Johnson LG, Friedenberg G, Copeland T, Clar A, Mora S, Moorthy MV, Sarkissian A, Wactawski-Wende J, Tinker LF, Carrick WR, Anderson GL, Manson JE; COSMOS Research Group. 2022, Am J Clin Nutr 115(6):1501-1510, doi:10.1093/ajcn/nqac056, PMID 35294969). Published title: Multivitamins in the prevention of cancer and cardiovascular disease: the COcoa Supplement and Multivitamin Outcomes Study (COSMOS) randomized clinical trial.

21,442 U.S. adults (men ≥60 years, women ≥65 years). Randomized to daily Centrum Silver or placebo. Median follow-up 3.6 years.

Primary outcome (total invasive cancer) was NULL: 518 cases on multivitamin vs 535 on placebo, HR 0.97 (95% CI 0.86-1.09, p=0.57). Secondary: Lung cancer significantly reduced (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.42-0.92). No significant effect on breast (HR 1.06), colorectal (HR 1.30), CVD composite (HR 0.98), or all-cause mortality (HR 0.93). Authors concluded 3.6 years may be too short to detect total cancer effect; longer follow-up needed, and their stated conclusion was that a daily multivitamin did not significantly reduce total cancer. The lung cancer result is one positive finding among many secondary comparisons in a trial that missed its primary endpoint, and no independent trial has reproduced it. COSMOS was funded by Mars Edge with additional National Institutes of Health grants, and the Centrum Silver was supplied by Pfizer Consumer Healthcare (now GSK Consumer Healthcare).

3
COSMOS-Mind: multivitamin and cognition (pre-specified secondary endpoint; the trial's primary agent, cocoa extract, was null)
PubMed

Ancillary study to COSMOS evaluating cognitive function (Baker LD, Manson JE, Rapp SR, Sesso HD, Gaussoin SA, Shumaker SA, Espeland MA 2023, Alzheimers Dement 19(4):1308-1319, doi:10.1002/alz.12767).

2,262 COSMOS participants ≥65 years (subset of larger trial). 3-year follow-up with annual cognitive assessments via telephone interview using composite of 5 tests covering global cognition, episodic memory, and executive function.

Daily multivitamin produced statistically significant improvement in global cognition vs placebo (effect size 0.07 SD, p=0.007), which the 2024 pooled analysis of the three COSMOS cognitive substudies describes as equivalent to about two years less cognitive aging. Significant improvements also in episodic memory and executive function. The apparent advantage in participants with a cardiovascular disease history did not reach significance on its own (0.14, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.31; interaction nominal p=0.01). The trial's primary agent, cocoa extract, had no effect on cognition (0.03, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.08, p=0.28). This is the largest randomized evidence available for a multivitamin and cognition, and it has not been reproduced outside the COSMOS trial.

Side effects and drug interactions

Common Potential side effects

Generally well-tolerated. Most common: GI upset (nausea, taste disturbances) when taken on empty stomach.
Iron-containing multivitamins can cause constipation, dark stools, GI distress. Keep them out of reach of children: accidental overdose of iron-containing products is a leading cause of fatal poisoning in children under 6, and the FDA requires that warning on the label of every iron-containing supplement in tablet or capsule form (21 CFR 101.17(e)).
Bright yellow urine from B2 (riboflavin) excretion, which is harmless and expected.
Yellow-orange skin (carotenodermia) at very high beta-carotene intakes. Smokers, former heavy smokers and people with asbestos exposure should choose a beta-carotene-free formula: in pooled randomized trials, beta-carotene supplements increased lung cancer risk (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.01-1.42) and cardiovascular mortality (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02-1.19), with the harm concentrated in people already at high risk of lung cancer.
Theoretical concern with antioxidant blunting of exercise adaptations at very high dose, but typical multivitamin doses do not produce this effect.

Important Drug interactions

Levothyroxine: calcium and iron in multivitamins reduce absorption; separate by 4 hours.
Bisphosphonates: calcium reduces bisphosphonate absorption; separate by 30+ minutes.
Tetracycline/fluoroquinolone antibiotics: chelated by minerals; separate by 2 hours.
Warfarin: vitamin K content (especially in higher-K formulas) can affect INR; maintain consistent intake.
Statins/methotrexate: niacin component may interact at very high doses (typical multi has only 100% DV).

Frequently asked questions about Multivitamin / Multimineral

What is a multivitamin used for?

A multivitamin provides a broad combination of vitamins and minerals to fill potential gaps in the diet and serve as nutritional insurance. It is the most popular supplement, used for general health support.

Does a multivitamin actually help?

A multivitamin is best seen as insurance against dietary gaps rather than a proven way to prevent disease in well-nourished people. It is most useful for those with limited or restricted diets, higher needs, or specific shortfalls. It does not replace a healthy diet.

When should I take a multivitamin?

Take it with a meal (ideally one with some fat) to improve absorption of the fat-soluble vitamins and reduce the chance of nausea. Splitting a multi-dose product can improve absorption of certain nutrients.

Is a multivitamin safe?

A standard multivitamin is generally safe for most people. Choose one appropriate to your age and sex (for example, many men's and postmenopausal formulas are iron-free, since extra iron is unnecessary for them). Avoid stacking many high-dose supplements on top of it.

What is Multivitamin / Multimineral?

A multivitamin combines a broad range of vitamins and minerals in one daily dose, serving as nutritional insurance to help fill gaps in an imperfect diet. Rather than a proven way to prevent disease in well-nourished people, it is best viewed as a safety net, most useful for those with limited or restricted diets, high…

What is Multivitamin / Multimineral used for?

Multivitamin / Multimineral is researched primarily for Cognitive. In 14,641 male US physicians aged 50 and over, followed a median 11.2 years, a daily Centrum Silver reduced total cancer diagnoses from 18.3 to 17.0 per 1,000 person-years (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.86 to 0.998, p=0.04).

What is the recommended dosage of Multivitamin / Multimineral?

The clinically studied dose is One tablet daily. Both large trials, PHS II and Cosmos, used Centrum Silver, a standard once-daily multivitamin at roughly 100% DV for most vitamins. Always follow the product label and check with a healthcare provider for personal advice.

Is Multivitamin / Multimineral safe, and does it have side effects?

For most healthy adults, Multivitamin / Multimineral is well tolerated at studied doses. Reported effects can include: Generally well-tolerated. Most common: GI upset (nausea, taste disturbances) when taken on empty stomach. Iron-containing multivitamins can cause constipation, dark stools, GI distress. It may also interact with some medications. Multivitamin / Multimineral is not right for everyone, so check with a healthcare provider first if you are pregnant or breastfeeding, have a medical condition, or take prescription medication.

Does Multivitamin / Multimineral interact with any medications?

Possible interactions include: Levothyroxine: calcium and iron in multivitamins reduce absorption; separate by 4 hours. Bisphosphonates: calcium reduces bisphosphonate absorption; separate by 30+ minutes. If you take prescription medication, check with a pharmacist or doctor before using it.

How strong is the scientific evidence for Multivitamin / Multimineral?

NutraSmarts rates the evidence for Multivitamin / Multimineral as Moderate (3 out of 5). It is backed by 3 clinical trials and 9 cited references summarized on this page. A higher rating reflects more, larger, and better-designed human studies.

References(9 citations)

Evidence ratings on NutraSmarts are based on the totality of human clinical research, with emphasis on randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews. The references below directly support claims made throughout this page.

  1. Vyas CM, Manson JE, Sesso HD, et al. Effect of multivitamin-mineral supplementation versus placebo on cognitive function: results from the clinic subcohort of the COcoa Supplement and Multivitamin Outcomes Study (COSMOS) randomized clinical trial and meta-analysis of 3 cognitive studies within COSMOS. Am J Clin Nutr. 2024;119(3):692-701..PubMedUsed to support: In the 573-participant COSMOS clinic subcohort, a daily multivitamin produced a significantly more favourable two-year change in episodic memory (0.12 SD, 95% CI 0.002 to 0.23) but not in global cognition (0.06 SD, 95% CI -0.003 to 0.13) or executive function and attention (0.04 SD, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.11). Pooling the three non-overlapping cognitive substudies within COSMOS (n=5,203), the multivitamin benefit on global cognition was 0.07 SD (95% CI 0.03 to 0.11, p=0.0009) and on episodic memory 0.06 SD (95% CI 0.03 to 0.10, p=0.0007), which the authors describe as equivalent to about two years less cognitive aging. All three substudies sit inside the same parent trial, so this is not independent replication.
  2. Gaziano JM, Sesso HD, Christen WG, Bubes V, Smith JP, MacFadyen J, Schvartz M, Manson JE, Glynn RJ, Buring JE. Multivitamins in the prevention of cancer in men: the Physicians' Health Study II randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2012;308(18):1871-80. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.14641.PubMedUsed to support: In 14,641 male US physicians aged 50 and over, followed a median 11.2 years, a daily multivitamin reduced total cancer diagnoses from 18.3 to 17.0 per 1,000 person-years (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.86 to 0.998, p=0.04). There was no effect on prostate cancer (HR 0.98), colorectal cancer (HR 0.89) or lung cancer (HR 0.84), and none on cancer mortality (HR 0.88, p=0.07) or death from any cause (HR 0.94, p=0.13). The larger reduction reported in the 1,312 men with a previous cancer (HR 0.73) is a subgroup, and it did not differ significantly from the rest of the trial (p for interaction 0.07).
  3. Baker LD, Manson JE, Rapp SR, Sesso HD, Gaussoin SA, Shumaker SA, Espeland MA. Effects of cocoa extract and a multivitamin on cognitive function: a randomized clinical trial (COSMOS-Mind). Alzheimers Dement. 2023;19(4):1308-1319. doi: 10.1002/alz.12767.PubMedUsed to support: In 2,262 adults aged 65 and over, three years of a daily multivitamin improved a global cognition composite by 0.07 standard deviations against placebo (95% CI 0.02 to 0.12, p=0.007), with gains also in episodic memory and executive function. This was the trial's pre-specified secondary comparison: its primary agent, cocoa extract, had no effect on cognition (0.03, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.08, p=0.28). The advantage reported in participants with a cardiovascular history did not reach significance on its own (0.14, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.31).
  4. Sesso HD, Rist PM, Aragaki AK, Rautiainen S, Johnson LG, Friedenberg G, Copeland T, Clar A, Mora S, Moorthy MV, Sarkissian A, Wactawski-Wende J, Tinker LF, Carrick WR, Anderson GL, Manson JE; COSMOS Research Group. Multivitamins in the prevention of cancer and cardiovascular disease: the COcoa Supplement and Multivitamin Outcomes Study (COSMOS) randomized clinical trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2022;115(6):1501-1510. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqac056.PubMedUsed to support: In 21,442 US adults (women 65 and over, men 60 and over) randomized to a daily multivitamin or placebo for a median 3.6 years, the primary outcome of total invasive cancer was not reduced (518 vs 535 cases; HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.09, p=0.57). Breast cancer (HR 1.06), colorectal cancer (HR 1.30), the cardiovascular composite (HR 0.98) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.08) were also unchanged. Lung cancer, one of several secondary sites, was lower (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.92).
  5. Loftfield E, O'Connell CP, Abnet CC, Graubard BI, Liao LM, Beane Freeman LE, Hofmann JN, Freedman ND, Sinha R. Multivitamin Use and Mortality Risk in 3 Prospective US Cohorts. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(6):e2418729. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.18729.PubMedUsed to support: Across 390,124 US adults in three National Cancer Institute cohorts with up to 27 years of follow-up and 164,762 deaths, daily multivitamin use was not associated with lower all-cause mortality in either the first (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.07) or the second half of follow-up (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.08), after adjustment for healthy-lifestyle confounding and reverse causation. Results were similar for the major causes of death.
  6. Fantacone ML, Lowry MB, Uesugi SL, Michels AJ, Choi J, Leonard SW, Gombart SK, Gombart JS, Bobe G, Gombart AF. The Effect of a Multivitamin and Mineral Supplement on Immune Function in Healthy Older Adults: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial. Nutrients. 2020;12(8):2447. doi: 10.3390/nu12082447.PubMedUsed to support: Healthy older adults took a multivitamin and mineral supplement or an identical placebo daily for 12 weeks. Blood vitamin C and zinc rose and self-reported health status improved, but there was no change in any measured immune function or immune status endpoint: whole-blood bacterial killing activity, neutrophil phagocytic activity, reactive oxygen species production, salivary IgA and plasma cytokines and chemokines were all unaltered. Vitamin D levels also did not change.
  7. O'Connor EA, Evans CV, Ivlev I, Rushkin MC, Thomas RG, Martin A, Lin JS. Vitamin and Mineral Supplements for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2022;327(23):2334-2347. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.15650.PubMedUsed to support: A systematic review of 84 randomized trials in 739,803 adults for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Pooled multivitamin use was associated with slightly lower any-cancer incidence (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.99, 4 RCTs, n=48,859; absolute risk difference between 0.2 and 1.2 percentage points) and lung cancer (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.95, 2 RCTs), though the reviewers judged the multivitamin evidence to have important limitations. Beta-carotene supplements increased lung cancer risk (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.42) and cardiovascular mortality (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.19). The overall conclusion was little or no benefit from vitamin and mineral supplementation for preventing cancer, cardiovascular disease or death.
  8. Fulgoni VL 3rd, Keast DR, Bailey RL, Dwyer J. Foods, fortificants, and supplements: Where do Americans get their nutrients? J Nutr. 2011;141(10):1847-54. doi: 10.3945/jn.111.142257.PubMedUsed to support: Using NHANES 2003 to 2006 (n=16,110, ages 2 and over) and counting food, fortification and supplements together, the proportion of the US population below the Estimated Average Requirement was 70% for vitamin D, 60% for vitamin E, 45% for magnesium, 38% for calcium, 34% for vitamin A and 25% for vitamin C, while under 8% fell short for B6, folate, zinc, thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, B12, phosphorus, iron, copper and selenium. Potassium and vitamin K are set as Adequate Intakes, and only 3% and 35% of the population respectively exceeded them.
  9. Blumberg JB, Frei BB, Fulgoni VL, Weaver CM, Zeisel SH. Impact of Frequency of Multi-Vitamin/Multi-Mineral Supplement Intake on Nutritional Adequacy and Nutrient Deficiencies in U.S. Adults. Nutrients. 2017;9(8):849. doi: 10.3390/nu9080849.PubMedUsed to support: In 10,698 adults from NHANES 2009 to 2012, taking a multivitamin and multimineral at any frequency was associated with a lower prevalence of inadequate intake for 15 of 17 nutrients with an Estimated Average Requirement, and with lower odds of biochemical deficiency for four of five nutrient biomarkers (iron was the exception). Intakes above the Tolerable Upper Intake Level rose for 7 nutrients, but affected no more than 4% of users for any single nutrient. Calcium, magnesium and vitamin D inadequacy persisted even among the most frequent users. This is an observational intake analysis, not a trial of health outcomes.