Lactobacillus paracasei NCC2461 (ST11)

Lacticaseibacillus paracasei strain NCC2461 (also called ST11 and NCC 2461; deposited as CNCM I-2116; formerly Lactobacillus paracasei)
Evidence Level
Limited
6 Clinical Trials
5 Documented Benefits
2/5 Evidence Score

Lactobacillus paracasei NCC2461, also called ST11 and now classified as Lacticaseibacillus paracasei, is a Nestlé probiotic strain deposited as CNCM I-2116. In placebo-controlled trials run with L'Oréal, the authors report less skin sensitivity and faster barrier recovery in women with reactive skin after two months, though the abstract gives no comparison with placebo, and men with moderate to severe scalp flaking improved more than on placebo over 56 days, though no main outcome was named. Self-rated nasal congestion after a nasal allergen challenge was lower than on placebo in 31 adults, but in 131 adults during grass pollen season symptoms did not differ from placebo. In hospitalized infants with diarrhea, stool output fell more than on placebo only in non-rotavirus cases. Nestlé or L'Oréal ran or co-ran every trial except the infant study, and no current retail product was verified.

Studied Dose Adults: 1x10^9 CFU a day for 56 days (scalp), 1x10^10 CFU a day for 8 weeks (skin, per its registry), 5x10^9 CFU a day for 8 weeks or about 1x10^10 CFU a day for 4 weeks (nasal). Infants: 1x10^10 CFU a day for 5 days.
Active Compound Live Lacticaseibacillus paracasei strain NCC2461 (ST11), deposited as CNCM I-2116 and supplied by Nestlé. Trials used powder sachets with maltodextrin, a fermented milk and a lyophilized powder; it was also tested with other strains in Nestlé formulas, which are not covered here. Other L. paracasei strains are covered on the species page and their own pages.

Benefits

Skin sensitivity and barrier recovery in women with reactive skin

In a two-month placebo-controlled trial in 64 women with reactive skin, the authors report that the strain taken by mouth lowered sensitivity on a capsaicin test and sped skin barrier recovery after tape stripping, the main outcomes in a registry entry posted after the trial ended. The abstract gives no between-group statistics, and a third registered arm was not reported. L'Oréal and Nestlé ran the trial.

Scalp flaking and redness in men

In 60 healthy men with moderate to severe dandruff, a daily sachet of 1x10^9 CFU for 56 days improved flaking, scalp redness and a global clinical score more than placebo, and self-assessments agreed. The abstract does not name a primary outcome or report scalp oiliness. L'Oréal and Nestlé researchers ran the study.

Nasal congestion after a nasal allergen challenge

In a crossover trial in 31 adults with grass pollen allergy, 4 weeks of fermented milk with the strain lowered self-rated congestion after a nasal pollen challenge compared with placebo, though the objective reaction threshold did not change and no primary outcome was named. A later trial against a two-strain blend found less itching but no change in congestion, its main outcome.

Nasal symptoms during grass pollen season

In 131 adults with grass pollen allergy, 5x10^9 CFU a day for 8 weeks during the pollen season did not differ from placebo on the daily nasal symptom score, the main outcome, or on quality of life, eye symptoms, medication use or allergy antibodies. All authors were Nestlé researchers.

Stool output in hospitalized infants

In 230 boys aged 4 to 24 months admitted with acute diarrhea, 1x10^10 CFU a day for 5 days had no effect in rotavirus cases. In less severe non-rotavirus cases, stool output, stool frequency and rehydration fluid needs were lower than on placebo. This was a disease population and a subgroup result, so it does not show an effect in healthy people.

Mechanism of action

1

Skin inflammation signals in laboratory tests

Medium from gut cells and immune cells exposed to the strain reduced substance P-induced swelling, mast cell degranulation and TNF-alpha release in human skin explants and sped barrier recovery after detergent damage. This was laboratory work in which no one took the strain, and it is offered by the developers as a possible gut-to-skin route.

2

Immune markers in nasal challenge trials

In the placebo crossover trial, IL-5 from blood cells and allergen-specific IgG4 were lower after the strain. In the trial against a two-strain blend, nose fluid white cells fell, while blood cell IL-5, IL-13 and IL-10 and grass pollen IgE rose slightly, as it also did after the blend. These are markers, they moved in different directions, and the pollen-season trial found no symptom benefit.

3

Allergic airway inflammation in mice

When pregnant and nursing mice drank water with the strain, their offspring later sensitized to birch pollen had fewer lung eosinophils, less IL-5 and less airway inflammation, while allergen antibodies did not change. Nestlé funded this study, and it is animal work that has not been tested in people.

Clinical trials

1
NCC 2461 for women with reactive skin: 2-month RCT
PubMed

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of NCC 2461 (ST11) taken by mouth for two months; a matching L'Oréal registry record (NCT01368224) lists 1x10^10 CFU a day in a powder sachet against maltodextrin and a third arm combining the strain with B. longum NCC3001 that the paper does not report (Gueniche et al. 2014, Benef Microbes).

64 women with reactive skin (32 per group) in the published analysis; the registry lists 96 women aged 18 to 35.

The authors report that the probiotic decreased skin sensitivity on a capsaicin test and sped recovery of skin barrier function after tape stripping, the registry's primary outcomes; the abstract gives no between-group statistics or results for leg dryness and cheek roughness. All eight authors were from L'Oréal or the Nestlé Research Center, and the registry was posted after the trial ended.

2
ST11 for men with moderate to severe scalp flaking: 56-day RCT
PubMed

Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of a daily sachet with 1x10^9 CFU ST11 or placebo for 56 days, with visits every two weeks and a follow-up at day 64 (Reygagne et al. 2017, Benef Microbes).

60 healthy men aged 18 to 60 with moderate to severe dandruff.

Free and adherent dandruff, scalp redness and the global clinical score improved more than with placebo from day 1 to day 57 (all P < 0.05), self-assessments agreed, and scalp microbiota shifted more than on placebo. The abstract does not name a primary outcome or give results for scalp oiliness. No adverse events were reported. Three of seven authors were from L'Oréal and two from the Nestlé Research Center.

3
ST11 fermented milk versus placebo before an allergen challenge to the nose: crossover trial
PubMed

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial; ST11-fermented milk or placebo for two 4-week periods separated by a 6 to 8 week washout, with a grass pollen nasal provocation test after each; the abstract does not give the dose; registered NCT01150253 after the trial ended (Wassenberg et al. 2011, Clin Exp Allergy).

31 adults with grass pollen allergic rhinitis.

Self-rated nasal congestion after the challenge was lower than on placebo (P < 0.05) and nasal itching trended the same way, but the objective combined nasal reaction threshold did not change. IL-5 from blood cells and allergen-specific IgG4 were lower. The abstract and registry name no primary outcome. Nestlé sponsored the trial and the Nestlé Research Center is among the listed affiliations.

4
NCC2461 versus a two-strain blend before an allergen challenge to the nose: crossover trial
PubMed

Double-blind, randomized crossover trial outside the pollen season; NCC2461 powder (about 1x10^10 CFU per sachet) and a blend of L. acidophilus ATCC SD5221 and B. lactis ATCC SD5219, 4 weeks each with a 6 to 8 week washout, with a nasal provocation test before and after each period; no placebo arm; registered NCT01233154 (Perrin et al. 2014, Clin Transl Allergy).

31 adults with grass pollen allergy; 28 completed.

The primary outcome, blocked nose after the allergen challenge, did not change, nor did the nasal reaction threshold that the registry lists as its primary outcome. NCC2461 reduced self-rated itching of the nose more than the blend did; white cells in nose fluid fell after NCC2461, though that change did not differ significantly from the blend. Some blood cytokine measures and grass pollen IgE rose, the IgE after both products, and the authors described some systemic changes as somewhat unexpected. There was no placebo arm. Seven of the 13 authors listed the Nestlé Research Center, though the paper declares no competing interests.

5
NCC2461 during grass pollen season: 8-week RCT
PubMed

Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled parallel trial of a daily 5 g powder sachet with 5x10^9 CFU NCC 2461 or maltodextrin placebo for 8 weeks during the 2012 Berlin grass pollen season (Nembrini et al. 2015, Clin Transl Allergy).

131 adults with grass pollen allergy confirmed by skin prick test and IgE.

No significant differences from placebo in the daily nasal symptom score (the main outcome), other symptom scores, quality of life or grass pollen IgE. The authors note this contrasts with two earlier allergen challenge studies. All authors were Nestlé researchers, and Nestec funded the work.

6
ST11 in hospitalized young children with acute diarrhea: 5-day RCT
PubMed

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at icddr,b in Dhaka; 1x10^10 CFU lyophilized ST11 or placebo daily for 5 days (Sarker et al. 2005, Pediatrics).

230 boys aged 4 to 24 months admitted with diarrhea of less than 2 days.

No effect was seen in severe rotavirus diarrhea. In children with less severe non-rotavirus diarrhea, cumulative stool output (225 vs 381 mL/kg), stool frequency and oral rehydration solution intake were lower than on placebo, and 76% versus 49% recovered within 6 days. The abstract names no single primary outcome or funder, and lists only the first author's affiliation. This is a disease population.

Side effects and drug interactions

Common Potential side effects

No adverse events were reported in the 56-day scalp trial, no serious adverse event was recorded in the 8-week pollen-season trial, and no formulation-related adverse event occurred in the crossover trial against a two-strain blend.
In the crossover trial against a two-strain blend, grass pollen IgE rose slightly after the strain and also after the blend, a change the authors judged most likely not biologically relevant.
Long-term safety: the published trials lasted 5 days to 8 weeks, so longer use is not well studied.
Two nasal trials gave the strain in milk, as a fermented milk or as powder stirred into cold milk; check the label if you avoid dairy.
The NIH notes that few studies have looked at probiotic safety in detail and that the risk of harmful effects is greater in people with severe illnesses or compromised immune systems; check with a doctor first in these situations.
Nestlé, L'Oréal or both ran every trial described here except the infant study, whose abstract names no funder, so independent confirmation is limited.
Check the strain name on the label; a generic L. paracasei product is not the same as NCC2461.

Important Drug interactions

Antibiotics: this is a live strain, and the trials did not study it taken with antibiotics; the skin and pollen-season trials excluded people taking antibiotics. Ask a pharmacist about timing.
Immunosuppressants: the NIH notes greater risk from probiotics in people with compromised immune systems, so talk with your doctor before taking live probiotics.
Allergy medicines: in the pollen-season trial participants could use allergy medicines as needed, and use did not differ from placebo; no interaction study has been published.

Frequently asked questions about Lactobacillus paracasei NCC2461 (ST11)

What is Lactobacillus paracasei NCC2461?

It is a Nestlé probiotic strain of Lacticaseibacillus paracasei, also called ST11 and deposited as CNCM I-2116. It has been studied mainly for skin comfort and nasal comfort, in trials run by Nestlé and L'Oréal. Results for other L. paracasei strains do not apply to it.

Does NCC2461 help skin and scalp comfort?

Two placebo-controlled trials run by L'Oréal and Nestlé reported less skin sensitivity and faster barrier recovery in 64 women with reactive skin over two months, and less scalp flaking and redness than placebo in 60 men over 56 days. The skin trial abstract gives no comparison with placebo, the scalp trial named no main outcome, and neither has been repeated by independent researchers.

Does NCC2461 help with nasal comfort during pollen season?

In the only trial run during the pollen season, 131 adults taking it for 8 weeks had the same symptom scores as those taking placebo. Two smaller studies outside the season found less congestion or itching after a nasal allergen challenge. Discuss ongoing allergy symptoms with your clinician.

How much NCC2461 was used in studies?

Adults took 1 billion CFU a day for the scalp, 10 billion CFU a day for the skin, and 5 to 10 billion CFU a day for nasal comfort, for 4 to 8 weeks. Follow the label of a product that names the strain.

What is Lactobacillus paracasei NCC2461 used for?

NutraSmarts does not list Lactobacillus paracasei NCC2461 under a health category. What the research covers: In a two-month placebo-controlled trial in 64 women with reactive skin, the authors report that the strain taken by mouth lowered sensitivity on a capsaicin test and sped skin barrier recovery after tape stripping, the main outcomes in a re…

Is Lactobacillus paracasei NCC2461 safe, and does it have side effects?

Side effects and cautions reported for Lactobacillus paracasei NCC2461 include: No adverse events were reported in the 56-day scalp trial, no serious adverse event was recorded in the 8-week pollen-season trial, and no formulation-related adverse event occurred in the crossover trial against a two-strain blend. It may also interact with some medications. Lactobacillus paracasei NCC2461 is not right for everyone, so check with a healthcare provider first if you are pregnant or breastfeeding, have a medical condition, or take prescription medication.

Does Lactobacillus paracasei NCC2461 interact with any medications?

Possible interactions include: Antibiotics: this is a live strain, and the trials did not study it taken with antibiotics; the skin and pollen-season trials excluded people taking antibiotics. Ask a pharmacist about timing. If you take prescription medication, check with a pharmacist or doctor before using it.

How strong is the scientific evidence for Lactobacillus paracasei NCC2461?

NutraSmarts rates the evidence for Lactobacillus paracasei NCC2461 as Limited (2 out of 5). It is backed by 6 study summaries and 13 cited references summarized on this page. A higher rating reflects more, larger, and better-designed human studies.

References(13 citations)

Evidence ratings on NutraSmarts are based on the totality of human clinical research, with emphasis on randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews. The references below directly support claims made throughout this page.

  1. Gueniche A, Philippe D, Bastien P, Reuteler G, Blum S, Castiel-Higounenc I, Breton L, Benyacoub J. Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study of the effect of Lactobacillus paracasei NCC 2461 on skin reactivity. Benef Microbes. 2014;5(2):137-45. doi: 10.3920/BM2013.0001.PubMedUsed to support: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in women with reactive skin, two groups of 32, taking NCC 2461 (ST11) by mouth for two months. A capsaicin test tracked skin sensitivity and water loss after tape stripping tracked barrier recovery; the authors report that the probiotic decreased skin sensitivity and sped barrier recovery, but the abstract gives no between-group statistics. Authors from L'Oréal Research and Innovation and the Nestlé Research Center.
  2. L'Oréal (sponsor), Société des Produits Nestlé (collaborator); ClinicalTrials.gov. Placebo-Controlled Study of the Effect of Two Food Supplements on Skin Reactivity (NCT01368224) ClinicalTrials.gov. 2011;NCT01368224; first posted June 2011, run June 2004 to March 2006; accessed 2026..SourceUsed to support: Not PubMed-indexed; read through the ClinicalTrials.gov API. Registered after completion by L'Oréal with Nestlé as collaborator: 96 women aged 18 to 35 with reactive skin randomized to maltodextrin placebo, 1x10^10 CFU NCC 2461 (ST11) alone, or NCC 2461 plus B. longum NCC3001, one powder sachet in water daily for 8 weeks. Primary outcome: skin sensitivity and barrier reconstruction after repeated tape stripping. It refers to a scientific dossier on ST11 for Innéov. Its design matches the 2014 paper, which reports only the placebo and NCC 2461 groups; no results are posted.
  3. Reygagne P, Bastien P, Couavoux MP, Philippe D, Renouf M, Castiel-Higounenc I, Gueniche A. The positive benefit of Lactobacillus paracasei NCC2461 ST11 in healthy volunteers with moderate to severe dandruff. Benef Microbes. 2017;8(5):671-680. doi: 10.3920/BM2016.0144.PubMedUsed to support: Randomized, placebo-controlled trial in 60 healthy men aged 18 to 60 with moderate to severe dandruff: a daily sachet of 1x10^9 CFU ST11 or placebo for 56 days. Free and adherent dandruff, redness and the global clinical score improved more than with placebo from day 1 to day 57 (all P < 0.05), and scalp microbiota shifted; the abstract does not name a primary outcome. No adverse events were reported. Authors from L'Oréal, the Nestlé Research Center, a Paris hospital and a Monaco laboratory.
  4. Wassenberg J, Nutten S, Audran R, Barbier N, Aubert V, Moulin J, Mercenier A, Spertini F. Effect of Lactobacillus paracasei ST11 on a nasal provocation test with grass pollen in allergic rhinitis. Clin Exp Allergy. 2011;41(4):565-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03695.x.PubMedUsed to support: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study in 31 adults with grass pollen allergic rhinitis: ST11-fermented milk or placebo for two 4-week periods with a 6 to 8 week washout, then a nasal provocation test. Subjective nasal congestion was lower than on placebo (P < 0.05), nasal itching trended the same way, and the combined nasal reaction threshold did not change; IL-5 from blood cells and allergen-specific IgG4 were lower. The abstract does not name a primary outcome or the dose. Registered NCT01150253.
  5. Société des Produits Nestlé (sponsor); ClinicalTrials.gov. Effect of a Probiotic on Grass Pollen Allergic Rhinitis Subjects (NCT01150253) ClinicalTrials.gov. 2010;NCT01150253; first posted June 2010, run August 2006 to March 2007; accessed 2026..SourceUsed to support: Not PubMed-indexed; read through the ClinicalTrials.gov API. Registry record for the fermented milk crossover trial: Nestlé is the sponsor, the comparison is a preparation without probiotics (placebo), it was registered after the trial ended, and no outcome measures are listed.
  6. Perrin Y, Nutten S, Audran R, Berger B, Bibiloni R, Wassenberg J, Barbier N, Aubert V, Moulin J, Singh A, Magliola C, Mercenier A, Spertini F. Comparison of two oral probiotic preparations in a randomized crossover trial highlights a potentially beneficial effect of Lactobacillus paracasei NCC2461 in patients with allergic rhinitis. Clin Transl Allergy. 2014;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2045-7022-4-1.PubMedUsed to support: Double-blind crossover study in 31 adults with grass pollen allergy (28 completed), comparing NCC2461 with a two-strain blend for 4 weeks each before a nasal challenge. No effect on nasal congestion (primary outcome); NCC2461 reduced nasal itching more than the blend and lowered nasal fluid white cells from before to after intake (a change not significantly different from the blend) and changed some blood immune markers. No placebo arm; seven of the 13 authors were at the Nestlé Research Center.
  7. Nembrini C, Singh A, De Castro CA, Mercenier A, Nutten S. Oral administration of Lactobacillus paracasei NCC 2461 for the modulation of grass pollen allergic rhinitis: a randomized, placebo-controlled study during the pollen season. Clin Transl Allergy. 2015;5:41. doi: 10.1186/s13601-015-0085-4.PubMedUsed to support: Double-blind placebo-controlled trial in 131 adults with grass pollen allergic rhinitis taking 5x10^9 CFU NCC 2461 or maltodextrin placebo daily for 8 weeks during the pollen season. No significant differences in symptom scores, quality of life or specific IgE.
  8. Sarker SA, Sultana S, Fuchs GJ, Alam NH, Azim T, Brüssow H, Hammarström L. Lactobacillus paracasei strain ST11 has no effect on rotavirus but ameliorates the outcome of nonrotavirus diarrhea in children from Bangladesh. Pediatrics. 2005;116(2):e221-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2334.PubMedUsed to support: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at icddr,b in Dhaka: 230 boys aged 4 to 24 months admitted with acute diarrhea took 1x10^10 CFU lyophilized ST11 or placebo daily for 5 days. No effect in severe rotavirus diarrhea. In the less severe non-rotavirus cases, stool output, stool frequency and oral rehydration solution intake were lower than on placebo and more children recovered within 6 days (76% vs 49%). Disease population; the abstract does not state the funder.
  9. Gueniche A, Benyacoub J, Philippe D, Bastien P, Kusy N, Breton L, Blum S, Castiel-Higounenc I. Lactobacillus paracasei CNCM I-2116 (ST11) inhibits substance P-induced skin inflammation and accelerates skin barrier function recovery in vitro. Eur J Dermatol. 2010;20(6):731-7. doi: 10.1684/ejd.2010.1108.PubMedUsed to support: Laboratory study: medium from gut cells co-cultured with immune cells and exposed to ST11 (CNCM I-2116) reduced substance P-induced swelling, vessel widening, mast cell degranulation and TNF-alpha release in human skin explants and sped barrier recovery after detergent damage. No living person took the strain; background for the proposed skin mechanism only.
  10. Benyacoub J, Bosco N, Blanchard C, Demont A, Philippe D, Castiel-Higounenc I, Guéniche A. Immune modulation property of Lactobacillus paracasei NCC2461 (ST11) strain and impact on skin defences. Benef Microbes. 2014;5(2):129-36. doi: 10.3920/BM2013.0014.PubMedUsed to support: Review by Nestlé Research Center and L'Oréal authors: identifies NCC2461 as ST11 and CNCM I-2116 and summarizes the companies' laboratory and clinical work on the strain's immune and skin effects. Background on identity, not independent evidence.
  11. Schabussova I, Hufnagl K, Tang ML, Hoflehner E, Wagner A, Loupal G, Nutten S, Zuercher A, Mercenier A, Wiedermann U. Perinatal maternal administration of Lactobacillus paracasei NCC 2461 prevents allergic inflammation in a mouse model of birch pollen allergy. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40271. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040271.PubMedUsed to support: Mouse study: L. paracasei NCC 2461 given to mothers in drinking water in late pregnancy and lactation reduced lung eosinophils, IL-5 and airway inflammation in offspring later sensitized to birch pollen; allergen-specific IgE and IgG did not change. Funded by Nestlé; two authors were Nestlé Research Center employees and a third had been when the work was done. Animal data only.
  12. Société des Produits Nestlé (sponsor); ClinicalTrials.gov. Effect of Probiotic Lactobacillus Paracasei NCC2461 on House Dust Mite Allergy (NCT01779895) ClinicalTrials.gov. 2013;NCT01779895; first posted January 2013, last updated April 2014; accessed 2026..SourceUsed to support: Not PubMed-indexed; read through the ClinicalTrials.gov API. Nestlé-sponsored randomized, placebo-controlled trial of NCC2461 in maltodextrin powder versus maltodextrin for 8 weeks in adults with dust mite nasal allergy; primary outcome a mini rhinoconjunctivitis quality-of-life questionnaire. Listed as completed in 2013 with no results posted; a PubMed search for the registry number found no paper.
  13. National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. Probiotics: Usefulness and Safety NCCIH (National Institutes of Health). 2019;Last updated August 2019; accessed 2026..SourceUsed to support: Not PubMed-indexed. NIH consumer and clinician page on probiotics: few studies have looked at probiotic safety in detail, so information on the frequency and severity of side effects is lacking; the risk of harmful effects is greater in people with severe illnesses or compromised immune systems.