Benefits
Traditional use to increase urine flow
The European Medicines Agency accepts couch grass rhizome as a traditional herbal medicine to increase the amount of urine and flush the urinary tract as an add-on in minor urinary complaints, provided enough fluid is drunk. That acceptance rests only on long-standing use of at least 30 years; its reviewers found no well-controlled clinical trial of any couch grass product.
Urinary comfort reports from open studies without a control group
In a post-marketing study of 313 people with irritable bladder or inflammatory urinary complaints, 32% to 53% were free of symptoms after 12 days of a couch grass liquid extract, depending on the complaint, and an earlier open study in 99 people reported fewer urination complaints. Neither had a comparison group, so the EMA judged both unsuitable for showing that it works.
Urine output in animal studies
In rats, a cold water extract raised urine output modestly compared with water, but rats drinking a couch grass infusion showed no diuretic effect and no favorable change in urine factors linked to crystal formation. The EMA concluded that no plausible animal data confirm a diuretic effect of the tea, and it found no clinical data on urine output in people.
Bacterial attachment to bladder cells in lab tests
An acetone extract of the rhizome, and a p-coumaric acid ester isolated from it, reduced attachment of urinary E. coli to human bladder cells in a dish without harming the bacteria or cells, while more water-soluble extracts had no effect. The compound is fat-soluble and present in small amounts, so it may be largely absent from tea, and whether it reaches the urine is unknown.
Blood sugar and blood fats in rat studies
In rats, a freeze-dried water extract of the rhizome at 20 mg/kg lowered blood sugar after a single dose and over 2 weeks in both normal and diabetic animals, without changing insulin, and lowered triglycerides, cholesterol and body weight in diabetic rats. These are animal results only; couch grass has not been tested for blood sugar or blood fats in people.
Mechanism of action
Fructan-rich rhizome without a recognized active marker
About 12% of the dried rhizome is triticin, a fructan built from roughly 30 fructose units that breaks down in hot or boiling water, alongside free sugars and sugar alcohols such as mannitol. European regulators could not identify any constituent with known therapeutic activity, so there is no marker to standardize products or to track in the body.
Flushing depends on the fluid drunk with it
The traditional effect is a flushing of the urinary tract, and the EU monograph states that adequate fluid intake is required for urine volume to increase. Animal tests of the tea did not confirm a direct diuretic action. No pharmacokinetic data exist for any constituent.
Phenolic compounds differ between teas and alcohol extracts
Analysis of the rhizome tea found at least 20 phenolic compounds, mainly caffeoyl and feruloyl quinic esters with coumaric, caffeic and ferulic acids, the flavonoid hesperidin, and the amino acid tryptophan. The fat-soluble coumaric acid esters active in lab adhesion tests were found in acetone and other low-polarity solvent extracts, and the EMA notes they may be present in alcohol extracts but not in water teas.
Clinical trials
Prospective randomized, unblinded trial of a supplement (CalcoMEV) combining 100 mg dry couch grass extract with 24 mEq potassium citrate twice daily, versus potassium citrate 20 mEq three times daily, each with the same diet advice and other medicines chosen by metabolic testing, for 5 months (Brardi et al. 2012, Arch Ital Urol Androl)
50 patients in Italy with kidney stones and one or more metabolic abnormalities that call for potassium citrate, 25 per group; some also took allopurinol, amiloride with hydrochlorothiazide, or pyridoxine.
Stone number (minus 1.0 vs 0.0 stones) and the diameter of the largest stone (minus 3.6 vs 0.0 mm) fell more with the combination, as did urinary uric acid (minus 164.7 vs minus 38 mg/24 h); urinary citrate, oxalate, calcium and pH did not differ. There was no placebo or couch-grass-only arm, the arms got different potassium citrate doses, and the EMA concluded that no conclusion on couch grass itself can be drawn and described the extract as not of pharmaceutical quality. The EMA notes that no adverse events were recorded.
Multicenter post-marketing surveillance study of 50 to 60 drops of a 20% ethanol couch grass liquid extract for 12 days, known only from the summary in the EMA assessment report (Hautmann and Scheithe 2000, Z Phytother; summarized by the EMA)
313 patients with irritable bladder, urethritis, cystitis or prostatitis.
At the end, the share free of symptoms was 32% with irritable bladder, 44% with urethritis, 53% with cystitis and 42% with prostatitis. No side effects were reported. With no control group, the EMA judged that the study met the criteria for a surveillance study but not for assessing efficacy.
Open clinical observation of a 20% ethanol couch grass liquid extract, 60 drops 3 times daily for 28 to 31 days, known only from the summary in the EMA assessment report (Barsom 1981, Erfahrungsheilkunde; summarized by the EMA)
99 patients (87 men, 12 women) with urination complaints linked to prostate enlargement, prostatitis or cystitis.
Urge incontinence, painful or difficult urination, night-time urination and straining were reported as significantly reduced in 44.4% to 100% of patients, urine markers of inflammation normalized, and 96% rated the results good or very good; no adverse effects were recorded. The EMA called it a pilot observation, not a well-controlled study.
Two-arm comparative study, described as randomized without stated methods, with no placebo or blinding, of an Agropyron repens extract in capsules dissolved in water at 5 mg/kg versus usual care for 60 days, with ultrasound every 14 days, known only from the summary in the EMA assessment report (Alosy et al. 2019, Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol; summarized by the EMA)
50 children aged 5 to 14 with kidney stones in Iraq, 25 per group; both groups were encouraged to drink water.
Stone number fell in 88% of treated children and in 3 control children, and stone size fell in 23 treated children; colic, blood in the urine and urinary infections were reported as reduced more often with the extract. The EMA noted undefined inclusion criteria, an undescribed control treatment, small size, no blinding and unavailable biochemical data, and judged it not enough to support efficacy.