Cera-Q® (Silk Fibroin Peptides)

Evidence Level
Limited
1 Clinical Trial
3 Documented Benefits
2/5 Evidence Score

Cera-Q is the trade name for a silk fibroin enzymatic hydrolysate: protein from silkworm (Bombyx mori) cocoons broken into short peptides. It is an animal-derived ingredient and is not vegetarian or vegan. The same material is also called BF-7. Its adult memory evidence is one 3 week randomized trial in 63 healthy Korean volunteers that was designed, run and paid for by the manufacturer, BrainOn Inc. Memory quotient scores rose with dose in that study, but two of its six memory measures showed no difference from placebo, and every human study of this material so far has been done in Korea, most of them by the manufacturer's own researchers.

Studied Dose 280, 400 or 600 mg per day in two divided doses for 3 weeks, the arms tested in the Korean memory trial. The 400 and 600 mg doses performed best.
Active Compound Silk fibroin peptides of roughly 500 to 5,000 daltons, produced by enzyme hydrolysis of silkworm (Bombyx mori) cocoon protein. Fibroin is over 90 percent glycine, alanine, serine and tyrosine. Also sold as BF-7.

Benefits

Memory support

In one manufacturer-funded, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial in 63 healthy Korean adults, memory quotient on the Rey-Kim Memory Test rose 8.9 percent at 280 mg, 17.5 percent at 400 mg and 24.8 percent at 600 mg per day over 3 weeks, against a non-significant 2.5 percent rise on placebo. That single 3 week study is the whole adult evidence base.

Word recall and figure recall

In the same trial the 400 and 600 mg groups remembered significantly more words than placebo and scored higher on redrawing a complex figure from memory. Two other measures were null: the learning gradient (p = 0.7440) and retrieval efficiency (p = 0.3959) did not differ from placebo. The effect was not seen on every memory measure.

Antioxidant activity in animals and cells only

Silk fibroin peptides reduced reactive oxygen species in cultured human neuroblastoma cells and reduced brain injury in rats and gerbils with surgically induced ischemia. That work was done in animals and cell culture, not in people. No antioxidant or brain-protection outcome has been measured in a human trial of this ingredient.

Mechanism of action

1

Antioxidant brain protection

Silk fibroin peptides reduce reactive oxygen species and oxidative stress in brain tissue in laboratory and animal models, a proposed basis for their memory effects.

2

Rodent brain-injury models

In rats and gerbils whose blood flow to the brain was surgically interrupted, oral BF-7 at 10 mg/kg reduced infarct size and cut errors in maze testing. These are animal disease models, published by the peptide supplier's own staff, and nothing comparable has been tested in people. Cera-Q is not a treatment for stroke or any brain disease.

Clinical trials

1
Cera-Q (BF-7) and Memory in Healthy Adults: Manufacturer-Funded Human RCT
PubMed

Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of silk fibroin enzymatic hydrolysate at 280, 400 or 600 mg per day in two divided doses for 3 weeks. 76 volunteers were randomized into four arms of 19; 63 completed. Designed, conducted and funded by the manufacturer, BrainOn Inc. (Kang et al. 2018, Nutrients)

Healthy Korean volunteers aged 28 to 92 (average 55), 76 percent women, recruited at religious meetings, social gatherings and senior centers. Memory complaints were not required for entry.

Memory quotient rose 8.9, 17.5 and 24.8 percent at 280, 400 and 600 mg per day, against a non-significant 2.5 percent rise on placebo. Words remembered, memory retention and complex figure recall also improved at 400 and 600 mg. Two endpoints were null: the learning gradient (p = 0.7440) and retrieval efficiency (p = 0.3959) did not differ from placebo. No adverse effects were reported over the 3 weeks.

Side effects and drug interactions

Common Potential side effects

No adverse effects were reported in the one 3 week trial of 63 adults. That is a single small, short study, not an established safety record.
Anyone allergic to silk should avoid it. This is a precaution, not a reported reaction: the memory trial excluded people with a silk allergy, so there is no safety data in that group.
Discontinue if any unusual reaction occurs.

Important Drug interactions

Anyone allergic to silk should avoid it. This is a precaution, not a reported reaction: the memory trial excluded people with a silk allergy, so there is no safety data in that group.
No drug interaction study of silk fibroin peptides has been published, so interactions are unknown rather than ruled out.
Tell your doctor if pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing a condition.

Frequently asked questions about Cera-Q® (Silk Fibroin Peptides)

What is Cera-Q?

Cera-Q is the trade name for a silk fibroin enzymatic hydrolysate: protein from silkworm (Bombyx mori) cocoons broken into short peptides. It is an animal-derived ingredient and is not vegetarian or vegan. The same material is also called BF-7.

What is Cera-Q used for?

Cera-Q is researched primarily for Cognitive. In one manufacturer-funded, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial in 63 healthy Korean adults, memory quotient on the Rey-Kim Memory Test rose 8.9 percent at 280 mg, 17.5 percent at 400 mg and 24.

What is the recommended dosage of Cera-Q?

The clinically studied dose is 280, 400 or 600 mg per day in two divided doses for 3 weeks, the arms tested in the Korean memory trial. The 400 and 600 mg doses performed best. Always follow the product label and check with a healthcare provider for personal advice.

Is Cera-Q safe, and does it have side effects?

Side effects and cautions reported for Cera-Q include: No adverse effects were reported in the one 3 week trial of 63 adults. That is a single small, short study, not an established safety record. Anyone allergic to silk should avoid it. It may also interact with some medications. Cera-Q is not right for everyone, so check with a healthcare provider first if you are pregnant or breastfeeding, have a medical condition, or take prescription medication.

Does Cera-Q interact with any medications?

Possible interactions include: Anyone allergic to silk should avoid it. This is a precaution, not a reported reaction: the memory trial excluded people with a silk allergy, so there is no safety data in that group. If you take prescription medication, check with a pharmacist or doctor before using it.

How strong is the scientific evidence for Cera-Q?

NutraSmarts rates the evidence for Cera-Q as Limited (2 out of 5). It is backed by 1 study summary and 5 cited references summarized on this page. A higher rating reflects more, larger, and better-designed human studies.

References(5 citations)

Evidence ratings on NutraSmarts are based on the totality of human clinical research, with emphasis on randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews. The references below directly support claims made throughout this page.

  1. Kang YK, Lee BY, Bucci LR, Stohs SJ. Effect of a Fibroin Enzymatic Hydrolysate on Memory Improvement: A Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study. Nutrients. 2018;10(2):233. doi: 10.3390/nu10020233..PubMedUsed to support: Randomized, double-blind trial in 63 healthy Korean adults (76 randomized, average age 55, range 28 to 92): memory quotient on the Rey-Kim Memory Test rose 8.9, 17.5 and 24.8 percent at 280, 400 and 600 mg per day over 3 weeks, against a non-significant 2.5 percent rise on placebo, while the learning gradient and retrieval efficiency did not differ from placebo. Funded and conducted by the manufacturer, BrainOn Inc., using the material sold as Cera-Q.
  2. Noh Y, Ahn JH, Lee JW, et al. Brain Factor-7 improves learning and memory deficits and attenuates ischemic brain damage by reduction of ROS generation in stroke in vivo and in vitro. Lab Anim Res. 2020;36:24. doi: 10.1186/s42826-020-00057-x..PubMedUsed to support: Animal and cell study, not a human trial: oral BF-7 at 10 mg/kg reduced infarct size and maze errors in rats and gerbils with surgically induced brain ischemia, and reduced reactive oxygen species in cultured SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells. Four of the authors are employed by Famenity Co., Ltd., which sells BF-7, and the paper declares no competing interests.
  3. Kim K, Park S, Yoo HK, Lee JY, Jung HY, Kim DH, Lee HJ, Kim JY, Youn YC, Marshall MR, Kim SS, Jeong Y. Brain factor-7 extracted from Bombyx mori enhances cognition and attention in normal children. Journal of Medicinal Food. 2009;12(3):643-8. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2008.1236..PubMedUsed to support: The second human study of BF-7: 46 healthy children in Korea, about 10 years old, were divided into a BF-7 group and a placebo group, and the BF-7 group cut response time on the Color Trails Making Test by an average of 23 percent and roughly doubled accuracy. It measured attention and cognitive flexibility in children, not memory in adults, so it does not extend the adult memory finding.
  4. Kang YK, Lee W, Kang B, Kang H. Retraction to: Memory-Enhancing Effects of Silk Fibroin-Derived Peptides in Scopolamine-Treated Mice. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2016;26(12):2228. doi: 10.4014/jmb.2016.26.12.2228. Retraction of J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;23(12):1779-84..PubMedUsed to support: The journal withdrew a 2013 mouse study of silk fibroin peptides and memory, stating that it was retracted for misconduct of the authors, specifically data fabrication and falsification. Its first author, from BrainOn Inc., is also the first author of the 2018 human memory trial of this ingredient.
  5. Stohs SJ, Bucci LR. Effects of Silk Fibroin Enzyme Hydrolysates on Memory and Learning: A Review. Molecules. 2022;27(17):5407. doi: 10.3390/molecules27175407..PubMedUsed to support: Narrative review, not a trial. It gathers eight human studies of silk fibroin hydrolysate at 200 to 600 mg per day for 3 to 16 weeks in people aged 7 to 92, all conducted in Korea and seven of them published in Korean domestic journals that PubMed does not index, most with the manufacturer's own researchers as co-authors, and one 99-person group reported in two separate papers. Both of the review's authors served as paid consultants on the 2018 memory trial, and the review describes that trial's learning gradient result as statistically significant when the trial itself reports it as not significant (p = 0.7440).