Benefits
Respiratory symptoms: no benefit shown
In the only trial that tracked respiratory symptoms, 50 healthy adults took the blend or a placebo for 56 days and logged cold and flu symptoms every day. There was no difference between groups in symptom severity, duration or frequency, sick days, or use of cold and flu medicine. Few participants got sick during this pandemic-era study, so it could not rule an effect in or out. No study shows that it prevents or treats any respiratory infection.
Antibody levels after a flu shot (one small trial)
In a Unigen-funded trial of 50 healthy adults aged 40 to 80, total IgA and IgG antibody levels rose more with the blend than with placebo in the 28 days after a flu vaccine. Antibodies against the flu strains themselves did not differ from placebo, and neither did T cells, NK cells, CRP or other inflammation markers. Total antibody levels are a lab marker, not proof of fewer or milder infections. Effects on cytokines and NF-kB come from mouse and cell studies only.
Antioxidant enzyme: not different from placebo in people
Glutathione peroxidase, an antioxidant enzyme, rose in mice given the blend. In the human trial it rose 13.6% to 15.7% from baseline in the blend group, but levels were not significantly different from the placebo group at any point, so the rise cannot be credited to the blend.
Mechanism of action
COX and LOX enzyme inhibition (laboratory and animal data)
In laboratory and animal studies, the baicalin and catechin blend inhibited the COX and LOX enzymes that make inflammatory signaling molecules. This has not been shown to change inflammation markers in people taking the blend: CRP and ESR did not differ from placebo in the flu-vaccine trial.
Antioxidant enzymes (animal data)
The blend raised glutathione peroxidase activity in mice. In the one human trial that measured it, the change was not different from placebo.