The recovery aisle runs on a quiet sleight of hand. A study finds that a supplement lowered a soreness score by a point, or dropped a blood marker of muscle damage, and the label turns that into "speeds recovery." But feeling slightly less sore, and having tidier bloodwork, are not the same as being able to lift, jump or run as well as you could the day before. That last thing is what recovery actually means, and it is the thing most recovery supplements do not deliver.

Here is what the trials show, graded on the outcome that matters, plus the one catch that can quietly work against you.

The short answer

  • Most "recovery" supplements move a soreness score or a blood marker, not next-day performance. The distinction is the whole story.
  • Soreness fixes itself. It peaks 24 to 72 hours after a hard session and fades in a few days on its own.
  • Beetroot has the most direct evidence for actually recovering strength and jump performance faster.
  • Tart cherry, curcumin and omega-3 are small, situational tools, best around competition rather than everyday training.
  • High-dose vitamin C and E can blunt the gains you train for. Do not megadose antioxidants for soreness.
  • Sleep, enough protein and easy movement beat every pill here.

Soreness, damage and recovery are three different things

Almost every argument about recovery supplements comes from blurring three separate things, so it is worth pulling them apart before we grade anything.

Soreness is the ache you feel a day or two after hard or unfamiliar exercise, delayed-onset muscle soreness, and it is measured by asking people to rate it on a scale. The catch is that a soreness score does not track how much muscle damage actually happened; you can be very sore with little damage, or badly damaged with modest soreness.

Damage markers are substances such as creatine kinase that leak from stressed muscle into the blood. They are convenient to measure, but they are an indirect signal whose validity for reflecting real muscle damage is genuinely debated, and a lower reading does not reliably mean you have recovered.

Function is the one that counts: how much force you can produce, and your range of motion. Researchers who study this consider the loss and return of maximal voluntary strength the best available measure of muscle injury and recovery. When a supplement lets you squat, sprint or jump closer to normal the next day, it has done something real. When it only softens a rating or a blood test, it may not have.

Why this matters for shopping Nearly every "clinically proven to speed recovery" claim rests on tier one or tier two, a softer soreness score or a lower blood marker. Ask of any product: did it help people actually perform better the next day, or did it just make a number on a chart look nicer?

The honest baseline, before any supplement

Soreness is self-limiting. It peaks somewhere between 24 and 72 hours after the session that caused it and then resolves on its own within a few days, with or without intervention. It is a normal part of adapting to a new stimulus, not an injury to be medicated away.

Your body also protects itself for free. After a single bout of an unfamiliar eccentric exercise, the same workout causes dramatically less soreness and damage the next time, an adaptation called the repeated-bout effect. No supplement comes close to that protection, and it is the reason easing into new training beats any pill.

Against that backdrop, the things with the largest effect on how you feel and perform tomorrow are not on any supplement shelf: enough sleep, enough total food and protein, and light movement rather than total rest. Everything below is a small addition on top of those, at best.

The three tiers of evidence

Here is the whole field on one grid, graded by which of the three things each supplement actually moves. Read the fourth column, real performance recovery, as the one that decides whether something is worth buying.

SupplementLowers a soreness score?Lowers blood markers?Speeds real performance recovery?Verdict
Beetroot / nitrateSmallMixedYes, smallWorth trying
Tart cherrySmallYes (inflammation)Only sometimesSituational
Curcumin (bioavailable)SmallYes (CK down)OccasionallySituational
Omega-3 (weeks of use)SmallYesRarelyFor other reasons
CaffeineSmall (perceived)NoSometimes, post-damageOptional
CreatineNoYes (CK down)NoTake it, but not for this
Whey / proteinNoSlightSmallFoundation, not a fix
BCAAsSmall, conditionalYes (CK down)NoSkip if protein is adequate
HMBNoYes (CK/LDH down)NoSkip
Vitamin C and E (high dose)NoYes (oxidative)No, and may blunt gainsDo not use for this
Magnesium, glutamine, taurineNoNoNoSkip

"Yes" means at least one credible meta-analysis or well-controlled trial; "small" means real but minor; "no" means no reliable effect. A GRADE-rated umbrella review of the field reached the same general picture: a short list of supplements reliably move markers and soreness, and almost none reliably speed functional recovery.

Tart cherry and the polyphenols

Tart cherry is the poster child of the recovery aisle, and a good illustration of the soreness-versus- function gap. The anchor meta-analysis found that its effect on soreness was only small, while its effect on recovering strength was moderate, which is actually the more useful finding. A network meta-analysis of eight supplement classes found tart cherry and pomegranate were the only ones that significantly reduced soreness at 48 hours.

But the enthusiasm outruns the data. A 2026 review funded by the cherry industry itself still found that soreness was significantly reduced in only 6 of 22 trials, strength recovery in 7 of 14, and athletic performance in just 4 of 10. And in well-controlled studies using actual next-day performance, tart cherry often does nothing: in trained water-polo players it changed no performance or recovery measure at all. Where it looks best is endurance events, where it reliably calms the inflammation and oxidative stress of something like a marathon and speeds the return of strength.

The honest read: tart cherry is a real but modest tool, and its best use is loading for several days around a competition you have to perform in, not everyday gym soreness. We cover the products in our tart cherry buyer's guide and the trial detail in tart cherry for exercise recovery. One caveat comes later: because tart cherry works partly as an antioxidant, hammering it around every training session may not be wise.

Curcumin and turmeric

Curcumin, the active compound in turmeric, has a similar profile: meta-analyses find a small reduction in soreness scores and a clear drop in creatine kinase, with the better-designed trials occasionally showing faster strength recovery too. One crossover trial of a bioavailable form found strength loss after damaging exercise was roughly halved at day four, and an elite-athlete study found it preserved next-day sprint power. But other meta-analyses find no significant benefit on soreness or damage markers once trials are pooled, so the effect is inconsistent.

The one thing that clearly matters is absorption. Plain curcumin is barely absorbed, so the trials that work use enhanced forms, with piperine, a phospholipid or nanoparticle delivery. We cover which forms are worth it in our turmeric and curcumin evidence review. As with tart cherry, its anti-inflammatory action is also the reason not to take it around every session during a muscle-building block.

Omega-3 and fish oil

Omega-3 fatty acids follow the familiar pattern with one twist. Recent meta-analyses find a moderate reduction in soreness scores and lower damage markers such as creatine kinase; a 2026 pooled analysis put the soreness effect at a standardized mean difference of about -0.75. But a dedicated eccentric-exercise meta-analysis found the real-world soreness reduction was statistically significant yet clinically trivial, and a systematic review concluded omega-3 adds nothing to hypertrophy or strength beyond training itself. In the one clean dose-response trial, only a high 6 grams a day reduced soreness; 2 and 4 grams did nothing.

Two practical points. Omega-3 is not an acute fix: it has to be taken for several weeks to build up in the muscle, so grabbing a capsule after a hard session does nothing. And unlike the antioxidant vitamins below, omega-3 does not appear to blunt training adaptations, and one 10-week resistance-training trial even found it improved strength gains. It is a reasonable thing to take for general health, with recovery as a minor bonus. Our fish oil guide covers dose and quality.

Beetroot: the one that moves performance

If the theme of this article is that supplements move soreness scores more than performance, beetroot is the exception worth knowing. The nitrate in beetroot is best known as an endurance aid, but a meta-analysis found it also accelerated the recovery of isometric strength at 72 hours (standardized mean difference 0.54) and of jump performance across 24 to 72 hours, the actual-function outcome almost everything else misses. A separate analysis confirmed a small ergogenic effect on muscular endurance and strength.

The effects are modest, and beetroot is not usually marketed for recovery at all, which is part of why it is underrated here. Doses in trials run around 400 to 800 mg of nitrate, roughly 250 to 500 mL of juice, taken for a few days around hard training. It is a more defensible recovery buy than most of the products actually sold for the job.

Creatine, protein, BCAAs and HMB

The supplements sold for building muscle get repurposed for recovery, with mixed honesty.

Creatine is the best-supported supplement for strength, and close to useless for soreness. Trials measuring strength, soreness and range of motion after damaging exercise generally find no benefit, even though creatine does lower the creatine kinase marker. Its one recovery-relevant trick is helping refill muscle glycogen faster when taken with carbohydrate, which matters if you train hard twice a day. Take it, but take it for strength, not for soreness. Our creatine guide covers the rest.

Protein is the real recovery foundation, within limits. Whey has the best evidence for restoring muscle function after hard training, though the effect is only small to medium, and one controlled trial found extra protein did not improve strength recovery or soreness at all. The win is hitting your total daily protein target, which our protein guide lays out, not buying a special recovery blend.

BCAAs reduce a soreness score in pooled analyses and lower damage markers, but the benefit is conditional, mainly in trained people, at higher doses, after mild-to-moderate damage, and it does not become faster functional recovery. Since BCAAs are three of the amino acids already in any complete protein, they are close to redundant once your protein intake is adequate, which is the case we make in do BCAAs work.

HMB is the clearest example of the marker-versus-function gap: it reliably lowers creatine kinase and LDH, and the official position stand endorses it for recovery only in hedged language, but it does not deliver faster real recovery in healthy people. The full case is in our HMB review.

The antioxidant trap

This is the part no supplement label mentions, and the single most important thing on this page. Many recovery supplements work by fighting the oxidative stress and inflammation that exercise produces, and up to a point that eases soreness. But that same oxidative stress is part of the signal that tells your muscles to adapt and get stronger. Blunt the signal too hard and you may blunt the adaptation.

The clearest evidence is for high-dose vitamin C and vitamin E. In a controlled trial, 1,000 mg of vitamin C and 235 mg of vitamin E daily blunted the mitochondrial adaptations to 11 weeks of endurance training. In older men, the same kind of high-dose vitamin C and E cut the lean-mass gain from 12 weeks of strength training roughly in half, from 3.9 percent in the placebo group to 1.4 percent, though their strength gains were not affected. And in a landmark study, high-dose antioxidants blocked some of exercise's metabolic benefits, including its improvement in insulin sensitivity. Vitamin C reliably lowers oxidative markers after exercise, but it does not speed functional recovery, so you get the possible downside without the upside.

The honest counterweight This is not fully settled. When the vitamin C and E training studies are pooled, the average blunting effect does not reach statistical significance, so some researchers think the risk is overstated. The safe reading is not to panic about the vitamin C in your food or a normal fish-oil dose, but to avoid deliberately megadosing antioxidant vitamins for soreness, because the downside is real and the upside for recovery is close to zero.

The practical upshot is a use-case rule. Antioxidant-based recovery aids, including tart cherry and curcumin, are most defensible when performing well tomorrow matters more than adapting from today's session, the days around a race or a competition. During a training block whose whole point is to get stronger or fitter, dosing them around every session may work against you in theory, but this is a precaution rather than a proven effect: the clear blunting evidence is for high-dose vitamin C and E, and a pooled analysis of polyphenol supplements found no significant effect on strength or lean-mass gains.

What to skip

Some staples of the recovery shelf have little behind them for this purpose.

Magnesium is sold for "sore muscles" and cramps, but the evidence is about neither DOMS nor exercise cramps: a review found magnesium does not meaningfully prevent cramps, with no trials at all in exercise-associated cramping. It is worth taking if you are deficient, not as a recovery aid. Glutamine and taurine have thin, inconclusive evidence for recovery and no dedicated meta-analysis supporting them. And high-dose antioxidant "recovery" formulas built around vitamin C and E belong in the previous section: actively worth avoiding around training you are trying to adapt from.

A reasonable rule for the whole aisle: if a product's evidence is a lower creatine kinase reading or a point off a soreness scale, treat that as interesting, not as a reason to buy.

How to actually recover faster

If you do want to use one of the few supplements with a real case, here is what the trials actually used and what to honestly expect from it.

If you use oneWhat the trials usedHonest expectation
Beetroot / nitrateAbout 400 to 800 mg nitrate (roughly 250 to 500 mL beetroot juice) daily for a few days around a hard eventThe one with the most direct evidence for faster strength and jump recovery
Tart cherryAbout 30 mL concentrate twice daily, or the juice equivalent, for 4 to 5 days before and 2 to 3 days afterBest case is a competition you cannot train through, not everyday lifting
CurcuminA bioavailable form (phytosome, nanoparticle or with piperine); plain curcumin is barely absorbed. Taken before and for a day or two afterModest, and formulation matters more than dose
Omega-3About 2 to 3 g combined EPA and DHA a day, for at least several weeks; it is not an acute fixReasonable to take for heart and general health anyway

These are the four with the least-bad evidence for something beyond a soreness score. None is a substitute for the basics below.

Frequently asked questions

What actually reduces muscle soreness after a workout?

A little, from several things, but less than the marketing suggests. Across the whole field, the supplements with the best evidence, such as tart cherry, omega-3, curcumin and BCAAs, mostly lower a soreness score by a small amount or reduce a blood marker of muscle damage. Very few of them speed up your actual performance the next day, which is the thing that matters. The unglamorous basics beat most pills: soreness resolves on its own in three to seven days, and sleep, enough protein and easy movement do more than any single supplement. The one supplement with reasonably direct evidence for faster strength and jump recovery is beetroot.

Does tart cherry juice really work for soreness?

Modestly, and mostly for inflammation and strength recovery rather than for how sore you feel. The anchor meta-analysis found only a small effect on soreness and a larger one on recovering strength. But a 2026 review funded by the cherry industry still found soreness was significantly reduced in only 6 of 22 trials, and well-controlled studies in trained athletes often show no benefit to next-day performance at all. If you use it, the realistic case is loading for several days around a competition you cannot train through, not everyday gym soreness.

Do BCAAs help with muscle soreness?

A little, conditionally, and probably not if you already eat enough protein. Meta-analyses do find BCAAs reduce a soreness score and lower blood markers of muscle damage, but the benefit shows up mainly in trained people, at higher doses, after mild-to-moderate damage, and it does not translate into faster functional recovery. Because BCAAs are just three of the amino acids already in any complete protein, hitting your daily protein target makes a separate BCAA supplement close to redundant. We go deeper in our guide to whether BCAAs work.

Can supplements slow down my gains?

High-dose antioxidants can, which is the most important and least-known catch in this whole category. Vitamin C and vitamin E taken daily in large doses can blunt the very signals that make your muscles adapt: in trials they reduced the mitochondrial response to endurance training, cut the lean-mass gain from strength training roughly in half in older men, and blocked some of exercise's metabolic benefits. A meta-analysis found the pooled effect did not reach significance, so the risk is not settled, but there is no upside to megadosing antioxidants for soreness and a real possible downside. This is different from the small food-level amounts in tart cherry or a normal fish-oil dose.

Does creatine help with recovery?

Not with soreness or next-day function, despite being the best supplement for building strength. Trials that measured what a trainee cares about, strength, soreness and range of motion after damaging exercise, generally found no benefit from creatine, even though it does lower the blood marker creatine kinase. Its one genuinely recovery-relevant use is helping refill muscle glycogen faster when it is taken with carbohydrate, which matters for athletes training twice a day. Take creatine, but take it for strength, not soreness.

Does protein reduce soreness, and is it enough on its own?

Enough total protein is the real foundation of recovery, but a single serving is not a soreness eraser. Whey protein has the best evidence for restoring muscle function after hard training, though the effect is only small to medium, and at least one controlled trial found added protein did not improve strength recovery or soreness at all. The win is hitting your daily protein target, not chasing a special recovery formula. Our protein guide has the numbers.

How long does muscle soreness (DOMS) last, and should I train through it?

Delayed-onset muscle soreness usually peaks 24 to 72 hours after an unfamiliar or hard session and resolves on its own within a few days. It is a normal part of adapting, not an injury, and your muscles protect themselves: after one bout of a new exercise, the same workout causes far less soreness next time, an effect no supplement can match. Light movement and easy activity generally feel better than complete rest. Sharp or one-sided pain, swelling, or soreness that keeps worsening past a few days is different and worth a doctor's look.

What is the single best supplement for muscle recovery?

There is no single best one, and any page that names one is selling something. If forced to pick, beetroot or nitrate has the most direct evidence for actually recovering strength and jump performance faster, and enough protein plus creatine covers the foundations for anyone who trains. Tart cherry, curcumin and omega-3 are reasonable situational tools, mainly around competition. But the biggest levers are not supplements at all: sleep, adequate food, and not increasing your training load faster than your body can adapt.

The bottom line

Recovery supplements are not useless, but they are oversold, and the reason is a measurement trick: lowering a soreness score or a blood marker gets sold as speeding recovery, when the two are not the same. Most of the popular options, tart cherry, curcumin, omega-3, BCAAs, HMB, do the first and rarely the second. Beetroot is the quiet exception with the most direct evidence for recovering actual performance, and creatine and protein earn their place for other reasons.

The biggest levers were never supplements: sleep, enough food and protein, easy movement, and sensible progression. And the one thing to actively avoid is megadosing antioxidant vitamins for soreness, which can cost you the adaptations you are training for. Spend on the basics first, and treat the pills as a small, situational finish.

VS
Reviewed for accuracy by
Vladimir Salamakha

B.S. in Chemistry, University of South Florida · a formulation scientist with 15 years developing compliant, evidence-based products across nutritional supplements and personal care. More about the author →

A quick note This guide is general information and an evidence-based review, not medical advice or a diagnosis. Ordinary muscle soreness resolves on its own, but sharp or one-sided pain, significant swelling, soreness that keeps worsening past a few days, or dark urine after very hard exercise can signal an injury or a more serious problem and deserve a doctor's attention. If you are pregnant or breastfeeding, take prescription medications, or have a medical condition, talk to your doctor or a registered dietitian before starting a supplement. Dietary supplements are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.
Sources
Warren GL, Lowe DA, Armstrong RB. Measurement tools used in the study of eccentric contraction-induced injury. Sports Med, 1999;27(1):43-59. PMID 10028132. · Nosaka K, Newton M, Sacco P. Delayed-onset muscle soreness does not reflect the magnitude of eccentric exercise-induced muscle damage. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 2002;12(6):337-46. PMID 12453160. · Baird MF, Graham SM, Baker JS, et al. Creatine-kinase- and exercise-related muscle damage implications for muscle performance and recovery. J Nutr Metab, 2012;2012:960363. PMID 22288008. · Hotfiel T, Freiwald J, Hoppe MW, et al. Advances in Delayed-Onset Muscle Soreness (DOMS): Part I: Pathogenesis and Diagnostics. Sportverletz Sportschaden, 2018;32(4):243-250. PMID 30537791. · McHugh MP. Recent advances in the understanding of the repeated bout effect: the protective effect against muscle damage from a single bout of eccentric exercise. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 2003;13(2):88-97. PMID 12641640. · Owens DJ, Twist C, Cobley JN, et al. Exercise-induced muscle damage: What is it, what causes it and what are the nutritional solutions? Eur J Sport Sci, 2019;19(1):71-85. PMID 30110239. · Hill JA, Keane KM, Quinlan R, et al. Tart Cherry Supplementation and Recovery From Strenuous Exercise: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab, 2021;31(2):154-167. PMID 33440334. · Xu KX, Chang J, Wu YJ, et al. Comparative effects of plant-derived anthocyanin- and flavanol-rich supplements on recovery outcomes after exercise-induced muscle damage: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Front Nutr, 2026;13:1857527. PMID 42666369. · Zhu Y, Smith J, Cohn A. The effect of Montmorency tart cherry consumption on athletic performance and post-exercise recovery in healthy adults: a scoping review. Front Nutr, 2026;13:1794292. PMID 42146083. · McCormick R, Peeling P, Binnie M, et al. Effect of tart cherry juice on recovery and next day performance in well-trained Water Polo players. J Int Soc Sports Nutr, 2016;13:41. PMID 27895542. · Howatson G, McHugh MP, Hill JA, et al. Influence of tart cherry juice on indices of recovery following marathon running. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 2010;20(6):843-52. PMID 19883392. · Beba M, Mohammadi H, Clark CCT, et al. The effect of curcumin supplementation on delayed-onset muscle soreness, inflammation, muscle strength, and joint flexibility: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Phytother Res, 2022;36(7):2767-2778. PMID 35574627. · Oxley RA, Peart DJ. The effect of curcumin supplementation on functional strength outcomes and markers of exercise-induced muscle damage: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr Health, 2024;30(1):77-92. PMID 37408367. · Tanabe Y, Maeda S, Akazawa N, et al. Attenuation of indirect markers of eccentric exercise-induced muscle damage by curcumin. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2015;115(9):1949-57. PMID 25921600. · McFarlin BK, Venable AS, Henning AL, et al. Reduced inflammatory and muscle damage biomarkers following oral supplementation with bioavailable curcumin. BBA Clin, 2016;5:72-8. PMID 27051592. · Yaghoobi E, Pashaei F, Allsopp GL, et al. Effects of LC n-3 PUFA Supplementation on Muscle Pain, Function, and Damage Markers in Healthy Young to Middle-Aged Adults Following Acute or Chronic Exercise: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Nutrients, 2026;18(9). PMID 42124047. · Lv ZT, Zhang JM, Zhu WT. Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid Supplementation for Reducing Muscle Soreness after Eccentric Exercise: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Biomed Res Int, 2020;2020:8062017. PMID 32382573. · López-Seoane J, Martinez-Ferran M, Romero-Morales C, et al. N-3 PUFA as an ergogenic supplement modulating muscle hypertrophy and strength: a systematic review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 2022;62(32):9000-9020. PMID 34128440. · VanDusseldorp TA, Escobar KA, Johnson KE, et al. Impact of Varying Dosages of Fish Oil on Recovery and Soreness Following Eccentric Exercise. Nutrients, 2020;12(8). PMID 32727162. · Heileson JL, Machek SB, Harris DR, et al. The effect of fish oil supplementation on resistance training-induced adaptations. J Int Soc Sports Nutr, 2023;20(1):2174704. PMID 36822153. · Jones L, Bailey SJ, Rowland SN, et al. The Effect of Nitrate-Rich Beetroot Juice on Markers of Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Intervention Trials. J Diet Suppl, 2022;19(6):749-771. PMID 34151694. · Evangelista JF, Meirelles CM, Aguiar GS, et al. Effects of Beetroot-Based Supplements on Muscular Endurance and Strength in Healthy Male Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Am Nutr Assoc, 2024;43(1):77-91. PMID 37167368. · Caldas LC, Salgueiro RB, Clarke ND, et al. Effect of Caffeine Ingestion on Indirect Markers of Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage: A Systematic Review of Human Trials. Nutrients, 2022;14(9). PMID 35565741. · Matsumura T, Nonoyama S, Endo K, et al. Pre-Exercise Caffeine Ingestion Leads to Greater Exercise-Induced Torque Reduction by Increasing Eccentric Load During Resistance Exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2026. PMID 42704769. · Black CD, Herring MP, Hurley DJ, et al. Ginger (Zingiber officinale) reduces muscle pain caused by eccentric exercise. J Pain, 2010;11(9):894-903. PMID 20418184. · Doma K, Devantier-Thomas B, Gahreman D, et al. Selected root plant supplementation reduces indices of exercise-induced muscle damage: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Vitam Nutr Res, 2022;92(5-6):448-468. PMID 33196371. · Northeast B, Clifford T. The Effect of Creatine Supplementation on Markers of Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Intervention Trials. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab, 2021;31(3):276-291. PMID 33631721. · Jiaming Y, Rahimi MH. Creatine supplementation effect on recovery following exercise-induced muscle damage: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Food Biochem, 2021;45(10):e13916. PMID 34472118. · Rawson ES, Conti MP, Miles MP. Creatine supplementation does not reduce muscle damage or enhance recovery from resistance exercise. J Strength Cond Res, 2007;21(4):1208-13. PMID 18076246. · Roberts PA, Fox J, Peirce N, et al. Creatine ingestion augments dietary carbohydrate mediated muscle glycogen supercompensation during the initial 24 h of recovery following prolonged exhaustive exercise in humans. Amino Acids, 2016;48(8):1831-42. PMID 27193231. · Davies RW, Carson BP, Jakeman PM. The Effect of Whey Protein Supplementation on the Temporal Recovery of Muscle Function Following Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients, 2018;10(2). PMID 29462923. · Pearson AG, Macnaughton LS, Hind K. Milk protein ingestion does not enhance recovery from muscle-damaging resistance exercise in untrained males and females: a randomized controlled trial. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab, 2023;48(6):455-468. PMID 36827652. · Fedewa MV, Spencer SO, Williams TD, et al. Effect of branched-Chain Amino Acid Supplementation on Muscle Soreness following Exercise: A Meta-Analysis. Int J Vitam Nutr Res, 2019;89(5-6):348-356. PMID 30938579. · Doma K, Singh U, Boullosa D, et al. The effect of branched-chain amino acid on muscle damage markers and performance following strenuous exercise: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab, 2021;46(11):1303-1313. PMID 34612716. · Weber MG, Dias SS, de Angelis TR, et al. The use of BCAA to decrease delayed-onset muscle soreness after a single bout of exercise: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Amino Acids, 2021;53(11):1663-1678. PMID 34669012. · Rahimi MH, Mohammadi H, Eshaghi H, et al. The Effects of Beta-Hydroxy-Beta-Methylbutyrate Supplementation on Recovery Following Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Am Coll Nutr, 2018;37(7):640-649. PMID 29676656. · Paulsen G, Cumming KT, Holden G, et al. Vitamin C and E supplementation hampers cellular adaptation to endurance training in humans: a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. J Physiol, 2014;592(8):1887-901. PMID 24492839. · Ristow M, Zarse K, Oberbach A, et al. Antioxidants prevent health-promoting effects of physical exercise in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2009;106(21):8665-70. PMID 19433800. · Bjørnsen T, Salvesen S, Berntsen S, et al. Vitamin C and E supplementation blunts increases in total lean body mass in elderly men after strength training. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 2016;26(7):755-63. PMID 26129928. · Clifford T, Jeffries O, Stevenson EJ, et al. The effects of vitamin C and E on exercise-induced physiological adaptations: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 2020;60(21):3669-3679. PMID 31851538. · Righi NC, Schuch FB, De Nardi AT, et al. Effects of vitamin C on oxidative stress, inflammation, muscle soreness, and strength following acute exercise: meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials. Eur J Nutr, 2020;59(7):2827-2839. PMID 32162041. · Martinez-Negrin G, Acton JP, Cocksedge SP, et al. The effect of dietary (poly)phenols on exercise-induced physiological adaptations: A systematic review and meta-analysis of human intervention trials. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 2022;62(11):2872-2887. PMID 33356471. · Talebi S, Mohammadi H, Zeraattalab-Motlagh S, et al. Nutritional interventions for exercise-induced muscle damage: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized trials. Nutr Rev, 2024;82(5):639-653. PMID 37460208. · Garrison SR, Korownyk CS, Kolber MR, et al. Magnesium for skeletal muscle cramps. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2020;9(9):CD009402. PMID 32956536.